Newsletter Subject

In a ‘Cage Match’ Between Tesla and Meta, We Just Handicapped the Winner

From

tradestops.com

Email Address

Daily@exct.tradesmith.com

Sent On

Fri, Jul 7, 2023 12:17 PM

Email Preheader Text

In a ‘Cage Match’ Between Tesla and Meta, We Just Handicapped the Winner Prior to the ?G

[TradeSmith Daily]( In a ‘Cage Match’ Between Tesla and Meta, We Just Handicapped the Winner Prior to the “Go-Go ‘80s,” corporate CEOs were business icons and even legends. But they weren’t yet true “celebrities” — at least, not in the way we view “celebrity” today. CEOs made headlines for their business moves, for the deals they made, and for the successes they delivered. But (with a few exceptions) their personalities, private lives, and colorful traits weren’t headline fodder. That all changed with General Electric Co. (GE) CEO John F. “Jack” Welch. Welch earned the nickname “Neutron Jack” from a weapon of the time — the “neutron bomb,” which killed people, but left buildings and infrastructure standing. During a needed makeover of GE, Welch cut thousands of jobs but left businesses standing. Welch’s graduation into the celebrity ranks was certainly helped by the fact that, during his two-decade (1981 to 2001) tenure at GE’s helm, he boosted the company’s market value by leaps and bounds. But his brash attitude, managerial strategies, headline-generating quotes, and ability to command the spotlight turned him into what many consider the first “celebrity CEO,” creating a culture of “CEO worship.” RECOMMENDED LINK [How to Tap into Wall Street’s “Secret Weapon”]( For years, Wall Street’s been using A.I. to gain an edge. Now, a top tech company is “leveling the playing field.” For over six years now, they’ve been developing a cutting edge A.I. algorithm that can predict future stock prices with astonishing accuracy. [Get the full story here]( Today’s corporate chieftains are often celebrities first and CEOs second. Great ones like Warren Buffett. Suspect ones like Elizabeth Holmes. Controversial ones like Travis Kalanick. And colorful ones like Marc Benioff. It feels like media coverage today devotes as much time to who is running a company as how the company is performing, creating “fanboys” and “fangirls” who follow and defend their CEOs with a zealous never seen before. But even within the realm of “celebrity CEOs” that Welch ushered in, we’re getting to watch something truly unprecedented unfolding between Tesla Inc. (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk (also the owner of Twitter) and Meta Platforms Inc. (META) CEO Mark Zuckerberg. The two have been exchanging verbal jabs online, as Zuckerberg ramped up the launch of a Twitter (estimated 237 million daily active users) competitor called “Threads.” And that led to a playground-style “callout” — which everyone is watching. On June 20, Musk said he was “up for a cage match if he is,” and Zuckerberg screenshot the message and replied on his Instagram platform with three words — “Send Me Location.” On Wednesday, Threads was officially launched, with 10 million sign-ups within seven hours of the launch. Posting his first Tweet in over a decade, Zuckerberg shared a popular meme of two Spidermen confronting each other. The post didn’t have any text or explanation, but it’s seemingly a reference that Threads is Twitter… but better… as Zuckerberg said in an Instagram post that the “world needs this kind of friendly community.” It took less than two hours for Musk to diss his rival: Dana White, the President of the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), wants to turn these digital punches into an IRL real cage match, with Vegas odds placing Zuckerberg as the hypothetical favorite at -160. As someone who knows wrestler Diamond Dallas Page, I have to admit that I’m really entertained by this. But as a successful entrepreneur, what I really want to see is who “wins” the business battle between Tesla and Meta — since that’s the cage match that can put money in your pocket. To get that answer, I knew where to turn… since investors are already “voting” on the outcome of that “Tesla vs. Meta” matchup. The Tesla vs. Meta Battle Royale To drill down into hard data that can project the eventual winner, I turned to Jason Bodner, the inventor of the [Quantum Edge investing system](. Because of his decades on Wall Street, Jason knows that if you follow the smartest and wealthiest “Big Money” players — and see where they’re putting their own cash — you can piggyback off their trades and create your own successful results. And that’s why his Quantum Edge system can provide such an “edge” in moments like this — it shows how Big Money is “voting” through their dollars on whether Tesla or Meta is a better buy. Let’s start with Tesla. In addition to [tracking the signals of Big Money buys and sells]( Jason’s system also has three scores for each stock: a MAP Score, a Technical Score, and a Fundamental Score. I won’t go under the hood and get into the nitty-gritty of how those work, but all you really need to know is that the higher the score, the better the investment opportunity. ☑️ MAP Score: 81 ☑️ Technical Score: 82.35 ☑️ Fundamental Score: 79.18 Those are all very solid scores. RECOMMENDED LINK [Fintech Experts Who Predicted NVIDIA Breakthrough Make Next Big AI Prediction...]( May be your ticket to becoming independently wealthy. Compelling new evidence shows why it may be the #1 Tech Sensation of the Decade! [Click here for urgent details]( Next, we can turn to those Big Money signals mentioned earlier. Over the last 30 days, there have been eight Buy Signals on Tesla, and over the last 90 days, there have been 11 Buy Signals. Now, let’s turn to Meta and see how it stacks up. ☑️ MAP Score: 81 ☑️ Technical Score: 91.18 ☑️ Fundamental Score: 66.68 Each is tied for the MAP Score, with Meta winning the Technical Score category and Tesla winning the Fundamental Score category. For a tiebreaker, we can turn to Big Money. Over the last 30 days, there have been three Buy Signals for META, and over the last 90 days, there have been 12 Buy Signals. Meta won the 90-day contest, but Tesla has trounced Meta over the last 30 days with eight buy signals to Meta’s three. In handicapping a winner, the data over the last 30 days tells us that it’s Tesla. Jason also shared that betting against Tesla right now is like standing in front of a moving bus and trying to get it to slow down all on your own. It won’t end well. We’ll wait to see if the real-life cage match happens, but we didn’t have to wait to see which company is winning as a [better investment opportunity](. Enjoy your Friday, [Keith Kaplan]Keith Kaplan CEO, TradeSmith [Download now on the Apple Store]( [Get It On Google Play]( [Customer Support: 866.385.2076](tel:+866-385-2076) | support@tradesmith.com [Request Customer Service](mailto:support@tradesmith.com) ©TradeSmith, LLC. All Rights Reserved. You may not reproduce, modify, copy, sell, publish, distribute, display or otherwise use any portion of the content without the prior written consent of TradeSmith. TradeSmith is not registered as an investment adviser and operates under the publishers’ exemption of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The investments and strategies discussed in TradeSmith’s content do not constitute personalized investment advice. Any trading or investment decisions you take are in reliance on your own analysis and judgment and not in reliance on TradeSmith. There are risks inherent in investing and past investment performance is not indicative of future results. TradeSmith P.O. Box 340087 Tampa, FL 33694 [Terms of Use]( [Privacy Policy]( To unsubscribe or change your email preferences, please [click here](. [tradesmith logo]

Marketing emails from tradestops.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.