Newsletter Subject

Two Potential Roadmaps for 2022 and Beyond

From

tradestops.com

Email Address

Daily@exct.tradesmith.com

Sent On

Fri, Jan 14, 2022 01:32 PM

Email Preheader Text

Two Potential Roadmaps for 2022 and Beyond Take a look at this chart of the S&P 500 Index . TradeSmi

[TradeSmith Daily]( Two Potential Roadmaps for 2022 and Beyond Take a look at this chart of the S&P 500 Index (SPX). TradeSmith Finance Does it look familiar to you? If you answered “yes,” you’re probably not alone. As you can see in the chart below, it looks a lot like the price action of the SPX since early 2020. TradeSmith Finance However, it’s actually a chart of the SPX during the early to mid-1960s. Now I’ll ask you if the following chart of the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 Index (NDX) looks familiar. TradeSmith Finance Again, you’d be forgiven if you said “yes.” This chart also shares some similarities with the price action of the NDX since the beginning of 2020. TradeSmith Finance But this chart isn’t from the 1960s, like the first one I shared. (The NDX didn’t even begin trading until the 1980s.) Rather, this one is from the late 1990s dot-com boom. RECOMMENDED LINK [When $3.4 Trillion in Retirement Savings… Just Disappeared]( Remember the 2008 global housing crisis? When the stock market crashed nearly 55%… and $3.4 trillion in retirement savings just disappeared — like so much smoke from a blown-out candle. Then there was the COVID crash of 2020… This man knew to sell his stocks right before it hit. Now he says the next crash is about to happen — and he’s got the exact day inside the envelope in his hand! [Click here to learn how he knows…]( Why do I mention this? Well, as you might’ve guessed, I believe these two periods could offer clues to the market’s performance in the year (or years) ahead. Let me explain… We’ll begin with the 1960s. I suspect few TradeSmith Daily readers were actively investing at that time. However, that period had a couple of striking similarities to today’s market environment that extended beyond the price action of the major indexes. The first was inflation. At that time, inflation started to rise sharply higher for the first time in the post-World War II era. Today, inflation is once again surging higher for the first time in decades. The second is the rise of [“one-decision” stocks]( — stocks that you can buy and never have to worry about selling. Back then, the investing public was in love with the “Nifty Fifty.” As the name implies, this was a group of roughly 50 blue-chip growth stocks. They were generally high-quality businesses. In fact, many of these companies — like American Express, Coca-Cola, and Disney — are still doing well today. However, their popularity at the time pushed many of their valuations to absurd extremes. Price to earnings (P/E) ratios of 50 or higher were common. Today, we’re seeing a similar phenomenon in an even smaller group of high-growth, blue-chip stocks known by names like “FANG,” “FANGMAN,” or “FANG+.” It includes stocks like Meta (FB), Apple (AAPL), Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), Netflix (NFLX), Nvidia (NVDA), Microsoft (MSFT), and Tesla (TSLA), among others. And many of them are currently just as expensive — or even more so — than the Nifty Fifty were at that time. As you can see in the updated chart below, this combination of rising inflation and extreme valuations led to a major sideways bear market where many stocks ultimately went nowhere for years. In fact, after accounting for inflation, most investors averaged negative returns for more than a decade. While I certainly hope I’m wrong, I believe we could be approaching a similar period today. TradeSmith Finance However, as I alluded to earlier, the late 1990s had some interesting parallels to today’s market environment as well. First, speculation was running rampant in the markets. Back then, folks were quitting their jobs to trade anything related to the up-and-coming internet, or “World Wide Web.” Investors tossed traditional valuation metrics out the window as they embraced the “new economy.” Many tech companies with no profits — and sometimes no sales — soared hundreds and even thousands of percent. Today, it’s arguably even worse, as investors will seemingly trade almost anything. “Meme stocks” with failing businesses? Sure, why not? SPACs (special purpose acquisition companies) with no real business to speak of? You bet. Humorous cryptocurrencies or digital pictures of rocks and apes with no actual use or value? Sounds great! RECOMMENDED LINK [You might already be using the Metaverse (and it could make you rich)]( For months, Whitney Tilson has been investigating a controversial new technology… one that you (or your kids) are probably already using. He also reveals a surprising way this tech could make you rich in the coming months. [Click Here]( The late ’90s were also a time of relatively easy money. Now, it’s true that interest rates were significantly higher than they are today. However, the Federal Reserve had slashed rates from nearly 10% to below 4% in response to the recession of the early ’90s. And it kept them relatively low throughout the decade even as clear signs of a bubble emerged. Today, rates remain at historic lows, as they have for most of the last decade. More importantly, the Fed has unleashed a virtual tsunami of stimulus over the previous two years in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. And again, like then, it has maintained these policies even as markets have detached from reality. While the central bank is now promising to begin withdrawing this stimulus, it has not yet started to do so. And it may already be a case of “too little, too late” if it does. If the markets follow this path, we could see a huge blow-off top where the investing public goes all-in on stocks, followed by a violent reversal as the speculative bubble unwinds. TradeSmith Finance Now, let me be clear. I’m not predicting that the market will follow either of these paths exactly. However, as the popular adage goes, “history doesn’t repeat, but it often rhymes.” And I think these two eras may be useful roadmaps for investors in 2022 and beyond. So which path am I favoring? Well, given the massive amount of stimulus we’ve seen in recent years — and the fact that we’ve yet to see extreme signs of investor euphoria rivaling the dot-com peak — I believe the latter scenario is more likely. But as a TradeSmith subscriber, there’s no need for us to guess. We can simply stick to our plan and let our powerful tools and indicators keep us on the right side of the market. Until next time, [Justin Brill]Justin Brill Baltimore, Maryland P.S. According to Andy Snyder, founder of Manward Press, the transition to a cashless economy has been a long time coming. The existence of physical cash acts as a natural check on the power of banks and governments. But they’re quietly implementing new rules to change that. If you want to shield your savings from the plots of these powerful entities, [you’ll want to hear what Andy has to say](. Best of TradeSmith The chart below represents the best-performing open positions over the last two years, as recommended by our software. [Download now on the Apple Store]( [Get It On Google Play]( [866.385.2076](tel:+866-385-2076) | support@tradesmith.com ©TradeSmith, LLC. All Rights Reserved. You may not reproduce, modify, copy, sell, publish, distribute, display or otherwise use any portion of the content without the prior written consent of TradeSmith. TradeSmith is not registered as an investment adviser and operates under the publishers’ exemption of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The investments and strategies discussed in TradeSmith’s content do not constitute personalized investment advice. Any trading or investment decisions you take are in reliance on your own analysis and judgment and not in reliance on TradeSmith. There are risks inherent in investing and past investment performance is not indicative of future results. TradeSmith P.O. Box 3039 Spring Hill, FL 34611 [Terms of Use]( [Privacy Policy]( To unsubscribe or change your email preferences, please [click here](. [tradesmith logo]

Marketing emails from tradestops.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.