Newsletter Subject

It’s not enough to be right.

From

tonystubblebine.com

Email Address

subscriptions@medium.com

Sent On

Thu, Oct 20, 2022 02:15 AM

Email Preheader Text

Issue #281 of the Better Humans Newsletter. Subscribe here for inspiration and knowledge. in

Issue #281 of the Better Humans Newsletter. Subscribe here for inspiration and knowledge. [Tony Stubblebine](coachtony?source=email-c7f27b30bfea-1666232051364-newsletter.subscribeToProfile-7038e003d060------------------------ab7b0b27_4413_4bb9_adf2_1b1d2a2412b6--------de6e5ad096a9)[Tony Stubblebine](coachtony?source=email-c7f27b30bfea-1666232051364-newsletter.subscribeToProfile-7038e003d060------------------------ab7b0b27_4413_4bb9_adf2_1b1d2a2412b6--------de6e5ad096a9) in [Better Humans](   ∙  3 min read   ∙  [View on Medium]( It’s not enough to be right. Issue #281 of the Better Humans Newsletter. [Subscribe here]( for inspiration and knowledge. ··· There’s some writing advice that I heard from Tim Ferriss but I think is attributed to Neil Strauss. It is roughly: “Write the first draft for yourself. The second for your fans. The third for the haters.” That’s just a catchy way of saying that you need to do separate edit passes for each persona in your audience. Not everyone is so lucky to have haters. For my third draft, I think instead, “how will this be misinterpreted?” That audience isn’t haters, but they are the ones with potential for interpreting things that conflict with your goals as a writer. But I don’t ask myself this question until I’ve gotten through the first two drafts. So for example, when I write these newsletters I write a first draft, by hook or by crook, trying to take the nugget of an idea and make it coherent to myself. It’s not quite “sit down at a typewriter and bleed,” but it’s close. Then I do an edit pass trying to make it read well to my core audience. This is a newsletter that’s more than a year old and so there’s some shared history and understanding. I’m aiming for clarity. Only then do I think about who is going to misunderstand me. I think first of my coworkers. Do you see now how “hater” is a hyperbolic word? I like using work examples but I don’t want my coworkers thinking I’m doing the Medium equivalent of subtweeting. Then, more recently, I started taking into account authors on Medium. For example, here I am giving writing advice. Do I intend that to be the official Medium policy on how every single writer here should edit their work? No. No. No. I think that by volume, most writing on Medium is self expression. It’s enough to do zero edit passes. If you are writing as art, then do art. Screw the haters and just write what feels honest to you. But then there are other times when you are writing to convince, persuade or teach. My first thought is the divisiveness of politics. But it’s really more common that you are talking to coworkers or other people that are theoretically on your team. In those moments, you want them to understand you correctly. In those moments, it’s not enough to be right. You also have to be effective. This, btw, is one of those points where I’m worried about subtweeting my coworkers. I honestly can’t remember if I’ve said this “it’s not enough to be right” to any of them, but I have said this at other companies. I’ve run into so many situations where a person was frustrated that their “good idea” hadn’t been accepted. Well, it’s not enough to have a good idea. You also have to convince other people that it’s a good idea. This phrase is the connection between this writing advice and all sorts of situations. How do you communicate with your family, a clerk, your doctor, etc? You have to start thinking beyond just being right. ··· There is a grey area here. How much responsibility do your readers have? I like to think they have a fair amount. Communication is a two way street and readers have a lot of leeway to choose how they will interpret something. But then again, if you as a writer know you have the skill to take more responsibility, why wouldn’t you? [Reply to this story](mailto:tony+newsletter@tonystubblebine.com?subject=Re%3A%20It%E2%80%99s%20not%20enough%20to%20be%20right.)[View story]( Sent to {EMAIL} by Tony Stubblebine on Medium [Unsubscribe]( from this writer’s Medium emails [Unsubscribe from all]( newsletters sent using Medium Medium, 548 Market St, PMB 42061, San Francisco, CA 94104[Careers]( Center]( Policy]( of service](

Marketing emails from tonystubblebine.com

View More
Sent On

12/01/2023

Sent On

13/10/2022

Sent On

05/10/2022

Sent On

28/09/2022

Sent On

21/09/2022

Sent On

14/09/2022

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.