Newsletter Subject

Lemonade Wisdom: The Tide is Turning

From

tinaswithin.com

Email Address

tina@tinaswithin.com

Sent On

Fri, Mar 31, 2023 11:47 PM

Email Preheader Text

The kids are aging out, they will be the change As I write this, my heart is breaking. I was loope

The kids are aging out, they will be the change As I write this, my heart is breaking. I was looped in to yet another situation where children in Phoenix, Arizona, are being sent to a reunification camp in Texas, Turning Points for Families. As a type, there are ten police officers and CPS at the home - and they've entered. This comes on the heels of reading a horrific declaration, written by a 16-year old boy who had attended this same camp. Because I don't want to trigger anyone, I am not going to share the excerpt of his declaration but if you want to read it, it was posted today at our Facebook page, [Alienation Industry](. We MUST get these camps shut down. As long as I've been doing this work, it's still difficult to grasp what is happening in our country, specifically what is happening in the family court system to our children. I reflect back to August 2009, when I naïvely believed I was the only one in the world going through such a difficult situation. I can emphatically state that the tide is turning. There are several journalists working on huge stories, class action lawsuits underway ([click to join one such lawsuit if your children were sent into a reunification camp]( and even a documentary in the works. Yesterday when a journalist called to speak to the owner of a reunification camp, the assistant who answered the phone stated, "these alienator's are causing problems!" If her definition of an "alienator," is someone who fights to protect their children from a toxic, abusive individual… I will claim that title with honor. We are working hard to shine a spotlight on the [alienation industry](. The tide is truly going to turn now that we have children aging out of the system. They are feeling empowered and, they are using their experiences to ensure that the spotlight is increased to the point that the light is blinding. They will not give up until every dark corner is lit up and there is no place to hide injustice, corruption, collusion. One such survivor is 18-year-old Maya who is currently in Mexico. I am humbled by her story, and dedicated to amplifying her voice. Here is her story: 18-year-old Maya who is currently residing in Mexico with her mother and siblings as they await a decision from the Hague Convention. Maya reached out to share her story and has commitment to being part of the change that we are so desperately working towards. She stands with us united in advocacy, envisioning a family court system that prioritizes child safety over parental rights. She is brave, articulate and a fierce protector of her youngest sibling who is in hiding from a court order that would have sent him into Turning Points for Families, owned by the notorious Linda Gottlieb. While there are very few smoking guns in the family court system, Maya happens to be holding one. The state of Texas is a one-party consent state meaning, it is legal to record conversations. On June 26, 2020, Maya recorded her final reunification therapy session with [Loretta Maase]( partner to Linda Gottlieb in the Texas branch of Turning Points for Families. The entire recording is an hour and a half in length and it’s chilling from start to finish. Prior to the final reunification session, Maya prepared a speech to bravely confront her father, detailing years of abuse at his hands. At the time, Maya was only 16-years old, and her delivery was composed, powerful and articulate. Very few adults who could have held their composure while detailing memories and abuse in such a clear and precise way. After addressing her father and confronting him with her memories, the dialogue between Loretta and Maya was disturbing: Loretta Maase: Your mom sent me a note and said, "Maya no longer trusts you, but she's going to come talk to her dad." Is that the situation? And so why is that? Maya: I know my mom had, you had asked a question to my mom, "If it had to do with sexual abuse what I wanted to talk about?" And I asked her because I had received an email from my dad saying, "You are better than this. Be honest, Maya." And he wouldn't have sent me an email if he didn't know what I wanted to talk about. Loretta Maase: Of course. So, the exact conversation was your mom had told me, "Have you talked with Maya's therapist?" I said, "No." She said, "She's been having a lot of memories and a lot of things come up in therapy, so you need to talk with her therapist." And I said, "Are they going to tell me that Maya's having memories of sexual abuse?" And she said, "Yes." And so, I didn't have questions about sexual abuse. She positioned it that she said, "I don't want to tell you what they are because I want Maya to tell you." And I said, "Okay." But then she mentioned it a couple more times, "Maya's having these things come up," and I said, "Okay, then you don't have to give me details, but is she going to tell me that she's been sexually molested?" And she said, "Yes." And so, I did call your dad and I said, "I can't see your face right now, but I need to know something. You're probably going to be accused and I need to know what you're going to say about that." So, it's not like I went to him and sided with him. I basically called him out and said, "What the heck is going on?" And so, he and I had a brief conversation. It's like, "This is going to be an issue and I need to know from you before Maya comes in this room, what is up with this?" And he denied it. So, it wasn't as if I asked your mom if you were sexually abused and I went to your dad and all that. I called him and said, "What the heck is going on?" So that's the intention of my conversation. Maya: But still, that's breaking confidentiality within something my mom told you and you- Loretta Maase: In family therapy, we don't have confidentiality. Maya: ... But still. If I haven't shared it with you, I don't feel that is something you should feel you can share when you haven't even heard this story from me. The conversation goes on for another 10 minutes before Loretta Maase states the following: “You have feelings that are associated with sexual molestation, not rape, but sexual molestation, the sexual nature, they bring up some PTSD kinds of bad feelings for you. But you don't have any kind of memories of where they originated from. So, my question for you, I know you processed this in here, if you've processed alternative hypotheses, just processed alternatives because I'm always thinking what are the range of possibilities and options and what are the range of where things originated? Because as you conclude this, I'm not saying your dad did or did not, I wasn't there, I don't know. As you move through this, you're giving yourself a lifelong sentence. If you assume that feeling, memories you don't have are about something you just experienced but you can't remember, it's a lifelong identity and sentence that you're giving yourself that you don't have any memories to substantiate it or support it. That concerns me whenever I hear that happen because it is an identity and a self-imposed harm for you to have that identity without any valid justification for it. I'm not saying your dad didn't. I'm just saying you don't have anything to validate or substantiate it, but yet you're going to give yourself a lifelong identity and sentence because of it. And it becomes a lifelong thing. I was somebody who was molested. It becomes an identity. It becomes something that festers, and it has an impact on our self-esteem and our identity and our issues that we have to work through. So, I'm just going to caution you, before you accept that for yourself, understand the lifelong implications because you don't have a tangible reason to believe that.” Towards the end of the conversation on this topic, Lorretta concludes with: “What I can tell you, if you would look up Dr. Stephen Ceci, and there are many others that do it steady memory and he works on capital murder cases, he works on kidnappings and sexual rape of babies, and I mean everything. And he talks a lot about research and just profound wealth of experience about memory. I would watch some of his videos about memory because memory is the number one most unreliable, one of our senses and one of our capabilities. He's like, "Don't listen to me, listen to the scientists about that." Memory is our number one most unreliable characteristic and that is profound to me that he is able to show as is Dr. Loflin, L-O-F-L-I-N, Dr. Loflin, is able to show that memories can be implanted.” In the session, Maya goes on to describe her diary dating back to when she was only eight-years old. At this young age, she journaled about wanting to die because of the various types of abuse that she, her mother and her siblings were experiencing. In response. To this confrontation, her dad continues to deflect, make excuses and dismiss the vivid, articulate memories that she eloquently shared. At several junctures, Loretta Maase chimed in to validate that what Maya and her family experienced, was in fact, abuse. Loretta Maase: “Okay. So, there was verbal abuse. There was emotional. Trying to get the children to see things from your point of view against their mom. I don't know if your mom has done that, but if both parents have done that from both parents, it's emotional abuse, psychological abuse. So, you said something interesting is that you acknowledge that you verbally abused them and let's just say that goes with emotional abuse and she added an addendum to it, but there was also physical. And so you're making a distinction that you didn't physically abuse them. When you expose them to throwing bottles and breaking windows that is domestic violence, which is physical abuse and emotional abuse and verbal abuse. It's abuse. So I think is that what you're referring to, that your dad is saying here that he abused but then he qualifies it and says, "Well this part here but not this part"? Maya: Yeah, and then he invalidates that I say, "Actually, you did abuse me." And I recount again if I feel safe in that time to say it again mentally and then he says, "No, that's not true." Or, "No, that doesn't count because it wasn't directly toward you." Because I'm saying, "You physically abused me sometimes." He's like, "The severity." You said, "Severity, it's different because you weren't your sister." Loretta Maase: So domestic violence to children, to all of us, to children, domestic violence is absolutely the same thing as physically abusing somebody. So if you're breaking windows, if you're throwing things, that's it. Doesn't matter if you're throwing something or you're punching a kid. It's domestic violence and it's still physical abuse, emotional abuse. So, I think once and for all, did you abuse these kids? (Maya’s dad): Yes. Loretta Maase: Physically, emotionally, or both? (Maya’s dad): Yes. I have a hard time with the physical part is what- Loretta Maase: [inaudible]. (Maya’s dad): Yes. I have a hard time with the physical part because when I hear physical, I'm thinking of a kid with broken nose and black eyes and being physically beating their body. Loretta Maase: Domestic violence- (Maya’s dad): You're going to tell me if I slam the door and the glass falls out and shocks everybody even myself, I've never intended to do, that that's physical abuse? Loretta Maase: Yes. Maya: And then- (Maya’s dad): Okay, then yes. Loretta Maase: Domestic violence is the same thing as physical abuse to her and to (younger sibling) and your older daughter to be involved in an environment where there's domestic violence, it doesn't matter if it's a broken cup or a broken nose, it's domestic violence. Maya: But then also seeing you invalidating my own experiences of physical violence because you say it wasn't directly toward me, like seeing you hurt my sister physically hurts me just ... maybe not even as much as her but it still hurts me to see. So, when you're pushing her down the stairs, when you're pulling her to the floor, when you're slapping her on the back, it's not like that doesn't affect me. That is still physical abuse. So, if I'm seeing that, it's not like I think I have a difference, and this isn't going to happen to me. Why do you think that never happened to me as much as her? It's because I got in your head and got to be your friend. If I didn't, I would've been facing the same level of physical hatred that you were inflicting on her. I'm not going to invalidate my own experiences of emotional abuse because I didn't face as much physical abuse as my sister. So, I'm not going to hear you saying, "I never abused you," because that is not true. Loretta Maase: Okay. So, it's like learning to befriend your enemy in order to stay safe, is what you're saying. Maya: Yeah. Loretta Maase: So, I think that the critical message here is that those years ago and again I think that's years ago, you did physically abuse these kids. You did emotionally and verbally, all of that is physical abuse. A bit further into the session, this disturbing narrative continues: (Maya’s dad): Maya, you're right. I did abuse you. It was a constant environment of stress and anxiety because of my abuse and behavior. I can see it. I have been hung up with this term of physical abuse in my mind where the first thing I think of about abuse is like punching kids or broken bones, broken arms or calling the CPS, Child Protective Service and take them away because they've been physically beat up to that degree. I didn't do that, but I did abuse you the way that you've mentioned, verbal. It is physical, slamming doors, throwing things, grabbing (sibling) by the arm, pushing her outside and tell her to sweep the porch, doing chores, trying to get her to her appointments, her sensory processing disorder and then ... Do you remember when I took her to Yogapeutics? Maya: I don't know why you're bringing that up at all. (Maya’s dad): Oh, you see that's why when I get so frustrated. I'm trying to get her ... I mean, I'm doing it wrong. I mean the doctor's saying she needs to do exercise and move and so I'm taking her outside to run and I'm physically pushing her to get her to run and that's like the worst thing to do, looking back, I mean that's stupid. Yes, physically was abusive also. I agree with you. That is physical abuse. If I grabbed her or coming down the stairs I pushed her, I didn't want her to fall and break her neck but yes, I pushed her, and it was dangerous. You're right. Maya: Oh, so now you're admitting it? (Maya’s dad): I admit that I pushed her, yes. I pushed her and I saw her stumble on the stairs. Maya: Thanks, took you long enough. Finally admit that. Loretta Maase: I'd like to add something here that you may not know about, Maya. Maya: Yeah. Loretta Maase: Your dad has been in very intensive treatment with a really well-known anger management specialist in [inaudible 00:55:55]. So they've been working for six months now on a very intensive program. So, I think you're seeing the change in your dad, being able to acknowledge the things I'm sure that he's covering in counseling. Is that correct? (Maya’s dad): That's right. Maya left this traumatizing reunification therapy session on June 26, 2020, and one month later, Loretta Maase recommended (through a series of emails), that the children enter an intensive inpatient program at the reunification camp, [Turning Points for Families](. Loretta claimed that the children were “resistant to any meaningful conversation about moving forward.” Lorretta recommended that the children resume aftercare with her and that the father should resume his parenting time following the four-day reunification camp. Six months later, on January 15, 2021, the case was heard in front of Judge James Arth in Austin, Texas. Judge Arth stated in his ruling; “I am going to grant the relief asked by (Maya’s father). I’m going to order the kids attend Turning Points Program: however, it’s not going to be with Ms. Maase because I think she’s been by the tainted the process, and if I want this… I am not saying that it’s her fault, but I want this to be successful, and I fear if she was involved in it at this point, (Maya’s mom) will further torpedo the issue, and it will be money wasted so there to do it with Miss Gottlieb in New York.” Maya’s mother, along with Maya and her siblings, fled to Mexico and currently await a Hauge decision which will determine if Maya’s younger brother will be forced to return to the United States and attend Turning Points for Families. Once children enter into a reunification camp, it is rare that they return to their preferred, safe parent. Turning Points for Families is promoted as ‘the ultimate four-day therapeutic vacation (for $15,000),” but it is never just four-days. There is a 90-day black out period where are the children are prohibited from contacting their safe parent. The aftercare portion of the program gives full control to Linda Gottlieb (or her colleagues) and several parents who were interviewed describe losing their children for several years, with little hope of being reunited. It is critical that we start listening to children, the most vulnerable members of our society. While Maya is no longer a child, her voice has been silenced for far too long by those who were tasked with protecting her. These individuals failed miserably in their duty to protect her, and her siblings. They did not act in her best interest. “My experience with family court and reunification therapy has been completely dehumanizing and traumatizing. I finally felt brave enough to stand up for myself and my family, to face our abuser. I was told that I was a liar. I am not a liar, I pride myself on honesty and transparency. I trusted Loretta because she told me that she had my safety and best interest at heart yet later, she tried to throw me right back into the cycle of abuse that I had mustered up so much courage to get out of. I hope to see other survivors of family court speaking up for themselves, being believed, and feeling supported. That has not been my experience. I hope to be an asset in reforming family courts so that children do not have to be continually victimized by a system that is meant to protect them. Everyone is deserving of a life without violence and our current laws do not ensure this basic human right for children. I hope that children’s claims of violence will be taken seriously and that their human rights will be preserved, no matter what “parental rights” are in place. I also hope that publicizing my story will help to protect my younger sibling. I know my voice has power and I’m ready to be heard.” Not only should we be listening, we should be collectively amplifying the voices of the brave survivors like Maya. These children now have a voice - and there will be accountability for those who failed to protect them. I want to leave you with a positive update on her case, we were just notified that the Hague Convention has ruled in their favor -- and they will be protected. I cannot emphasize what a crisis we have on our hands when citizens are fleeing to Mexico for protection because the United States is failing them. The time is now [to pass Kayden's Law in all 50 states]( as it will have a significant impact on those who are participating in designer human trafficking, also known as reunification camps. I want to emphasize to all of you, my heart is with you. I would not wish this type of journey on anyone and I know it feels heavy to continue reading stories of family court failures. I know it's even heavier, when you are living a family court failure. I do my best to read all of the messages that come through, I am not able to respond to all but, please know that I care, I see you, and I hear you. I am dedicated to continuing to expose this crisis. Please take care of yourself, and please keep your oxygen mask on tight. Sending love and light, Tina - [One Mom's Battle by Annie Kenny: Welcome to America, the Land of the Free - Unless you are the Child of An Abuser]( - [ProPublica: Barricaded Siblings Turn to TikTok While Defying Court Order to Return to Father They Say Abused Them]( - [Page Six: Lala Kent Protesting Family Court Abuse]( - [San Francisco Public Press: Family Courts Rely on Dubious Theory to Dismiss Child Abuse Claims]( - [San Francisco Public Press: Children’s Violent Removal From Santa Cruz Home Raises Calls to End Reunification Camps]( - [Good Times Santa Cruz: Teens and Lawmakers Work to Outlaw Reunification Therapy]( We have eight spaces remaining for the April session, we invite you to apply today at [➡][hcdivorcecoach.com/apply]( [Click here to learn ALL about becoming a High Conflict Divorce Coach.]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Link]( [Website]( [Pinterest]( [LinkedIn]( [YouTube]( Our mailing address is: One Mom's Battle/Tina Swithin P.O. Box 123 San Luis Obispo, California 93406 Want to change how you receive these emails? You can [update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe from this list](. Copyright © 2021 One Mom's Battle, LLC, All rights reserved

EDM Keywords (424)

yet yes wrong write would works working work wish whenever went way wanting wanted want voices voice violence view videos verbally validate using us update unsubscribe understand type turning turn trying true tried traumatizing transparency towards torpedo took told title time tiktok tide throw thinking think things thing therapy therapist texas term tell tasked talks talked talk taking take tainted system sweep survivors survivor sure support successful substantiate stumble stress story still state start stands stand stairs spotlight speech speak sometimes something someone somebody society slapping slam situation sister silenced sided siblings show shine shared share severity session series sentence sent senses seeing see scientists says saying say saw said safety run ruling ruled room right reunited return resume response respond resistant research remember referring recount received receive ready reading read rare rape range questions question qualifies pushing pushed punching pulling publicizing protection protecting protected protect promoted prohibited profound processed process pride preserved preferences power possibilities positioned porch point place period participating part parents owner outside originated order options one notified note never needs need neck mustered much move mother mom molested mind mexico messages mentioned mentally memory memories meant mean maybe maya may matter making lot loretta looped longer long living lit listening listen like light liar level let length legal leave learn lawsuit law land know kind kids kidnappings kid journey journaled issues issue involved invite invalidating invalidates invalidate intention inflicting increased implanted impact identity hurt hung humbled hour hope honor honesty home hiding help held heels heck heart heard hear head happening happen hands half grasp grant grabbed got going goes giving give get frustrated front friend forced following floor fleeing fights festers feelings feel fear favor fault father far family families fall failing failed facing face expose experiencing experiences experienced experience exercise excerpt everyone even environment entered ensure enemy end emphasize emotionally emails email duty door done documentary doctor distinction dismiss different difference die dialogue determine details deserving describe denied delivery degree definition dedicated declaration decision dangerous dad cycle currently critical crisis cps covering course couple count counseling could conversation continuing contacting confronting confrontation conclude concerns composure commitment coming comes come colleagues clear claims claim citizens chilling children child change caution case care capabilities camp calling called call bringing bring breaking break blinding bit better best believed believe behavior befriend becoming becomes battle back babies away await attended assume associated assistant asset asked articulate appointments anything anyone anxiety answered amplifying america alienator agree aging affect adults admitting admit addressing addendum added act acknowledge accused accountability accept abuser abused abuse absolutely able

Marketing emails from tinaswithin.com

View More
Sent On

17/08/2024

Sent On

28/07/2024

Sent On

12/07/2024

Sent On

25/06/2024

Sent On

19/06/2024

Sent On

14/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.