Newsletter Subject

Life After Moab

From

threefounderspublishing.com

Email Address

gildersdailyprophecy@email.threefounderspublishing.com

Sent On

Mon, Mar 15, 2021 07:27 PM

Email Preheader Text

Lessons from the novel Fall | **STREAMING NOW** The world?s first-ever TechX Talk is now LIVE Watc

Lessons from the novel Fall [Gilder's Daily Prophecy] March 15, 2021 [UNSUBSCRIBE]( | [ARCHIVES]( **STREAMING NOW** [Audience]( world’s first-ever TechX Talk is now LIVE Watch George Gilder, the man dubbed “The Tech Prophet” reveal where he thinks America’s next tech fortunes will be made. [View the whole presentation here.]( [Warning] Do you enjoy receiving Gilder's Daily Prophecy? Please [Click Here Now]( so we know to continue sending you Gilder's Daily Prophecy for free! Life After Moab [George Gilder]Dear Daily Prophecy Reader, Today, I am introducing a British colleague named Nick O’Connor, who wrote this provocative Daily Prophecy. [Weird Federal rule could turn America on its head]( If a nuclear bomb exploded in the United States today, how would you know? Let’s assume — for the purposes of this thought experiment — that it doesn’t detonate close enough to your home for you to be able to see or hear it. Lucky you. But now you have a problem: if you weren’t there to witness it, how do you know that it happened? Most people would turn to the media, either old or new: they’d put the TV on, go on the internet, maybe even turn on the radio. There’d be a million ways to verify what was going on. But that’s where our thought experiment turns strange. Imagine parts of the media – in particular social media – report that there’d been a nuclear explosion in the USA… and then change their mind, correct the story and claim there wasn’t. What then? You know there must be some faulty reporting somewhere in the mix. But where? Was there really a nuke – and it was covered up? Or did it never happen to begin with? In which case – why did the media report it has having happened? It might be a thought experiment. But it cuts to the core of one of the biggest challenges we all face. How do we know what is true in a world where the media is hackable and much of the population believes what it wants to believe, rather than what’s true? As in so many things, this idea was pre-empted by the work of the novelist and futurist Neal Stephenson in his most recent novel, Fall. In Life After Google, George refers to Stephenson as “the twenty-first century’s greatest writer and demiurge”. I agree. In fact I wonder if even that could be downplaying it a little. Though works of fiction, Stephenson’s work prophesizes everything from the emergence of electronic cryptocurrencies to gene engineering. Parts of his 1994 novel Snow Crash take place in what’s called the “multiverse” – a kind of three dimensional, virtual-reality internet. In Silicon Valley VR circles, the book is incredibly influential. But back to our fictional nuclear blast. (Note: I’m about to give away one very small part of the plot of Fall. Nothing that’ll ruin your enjoyment when you read it. But consider this a polite spoiler alert nonetheless.) Eccentric Multi-Millionaire Announces Income Challenge Open To All Americans [Millionaire]( you’d like to see how to make $500 in instant income, with a simple options trade most investors have never heard of… Then you need to see [this]( now. You don’t need a major investment either ($7,500 is enough to get started) … [Click here]( get more details on the challenge before it’s too late. COVID is the World’s Moab At one point in the novel Moab, Utah, is destroyed by a nuclear blast. Or it appears to be destroyed. It is reported as having been destroyed. And the hoax fools even parts of the government and military. It’s what you might call a real-world-deepfake. But the real damage is done on social media, which goes into overdrive. Within the life of the novel, the event becomes a kind of cultural touchstone. Though it becomes clear that no nuclear blast ever occurred, millions of people go on believing it happened. Moab “truthers” hold rallies protesting against the government cover up. T-Shirts branded “Remember Moab” become common. In real life Moab exists. But in the nightmarish world of weaponised misinformation and precision deep faking… it has been destroyed in a nuclear blast. People believe what they want to believe. Stephenson doesn’t offer a solution to the problem. This is unfortunate. Why? Because the fictional world he imagines and the real world we’re living day today are on a collision course. Perhaps that collision has already happened. Or perhaps we’re living through that very collision as we speak. Don’t scoff. The parallels are closer than you might think. Take three major issues of we hear about a lot: COVID, climate change and the 2020 election. All come perilously close to “going Moab.” They’re all highly politicised issues. People’s views on them tend to align with their political persuasion. There is little consensus or agreement on what’s happening (or in the case of the election, what happened). And yet all three issues are characterised by the fact the authorities — the digital-industrial-state — attempt to present an unchallenged narrative about them. (The irony is that in silencing debate and competing narratives, the authorities actually make each issue more fertile for disinformation and deepfakes. I would suggest this is because on some fundamental level, people hate being told what to think, and therefore seek out alternative ideas, whether rightly or wrongly. But that subject is beyond the scope of this essay.) Let me give you an example. As an Englishman who has — sadly — been unable to visit the USA for more than a year, I won’t comment on the election. So, let me take a subject that has likely affected us both in similar ways: COVID. I’d suggest COVID is the world’s Moab. Not in the sense that it’s a hoax — which it clearly isn’t. But in the way that no one can quite agree what it is: how dangerous it is, what the correct response is or what should be done about it. I predict that in twenty years’ time, people still won’t quite be able to agree on what happened. It’ll divide people forever. “Oh dad, don’t mention COVID, it’s Christmas Day…” And a big part of that is because of the way the authorities attempted to silence competing narratives around it. Here’s a great example. Have you ever heard of The Great Barrington Declaration? I hope you have. But I fear many people haven’t. [More important than your Social Security number?]( A Battle Royale Filled with Hypocrisy It is a worldwide petition against the way the COVID-19 pandemic has been dealt with. It was created by scientists at Oxford, Harvard and Stanford. In other words: highly credibly experts. And it’s been signed — as I write — by nearly 55,000 public health scientists and medical practitioners globally. That doesn’t mean it’s right. But it does suggest it’s an idea that was worth hearing about. And yet, that was surprisingly hard to do. As The Spectator put it back in October: Since its launch, the declaration been signed by tens of thousands of epidemiologists and public health scientists, including a Nobel Prize winner. So why haven’t you heard of it? The short answer is there’s been a well-orchestrated attempt to suppress and discredit it. I searched for it on Google last Saturday and the top link was to an article in an obscure left-wing magazine claiming the petition was the work of a ‘climate science denial network’ funded by a right-wing billionaire. We’re told to listen to “the” science and “the” experts. But that sort of finger-wagging use of the definite article — “the” — is rank with hypocrisy. What it really means is, listen to “some” science, and listen to “some” experts. That science and those experts being the ones that happen to agree with the authorities. Anything else is heresy. It’s a dangerous situation. It creates fertile ground for disinformation and deepfakes and that don’t just unfold virtually but in real life too. It is no longer the means of production that are most valuable — but the means of information. It’s a battle for the soul of the Information Age. There are answers. The trend away from a centralised, siloed internet and towards a decentralised network built on the blockchain is one. As a Gilder’s Daily Prophecy reader you’re in the right place to hear more about that. On that front… have you seen George’s first ever TechX Talk? It’s a fascinating insight into a massive change taking place in the tech world right now — one you might not hear much about elsewhere. The ‘Spatial Web’ is emerging – check out George’s talk and more for free by [clicking here](. But there’s a more personal solution, too. It goes back to the question I asked you at the start of this essay. How do we know if something is true? According to Nietzsche, there’s one important distinction to understand when valuing knowledge. There’s “Erfahrung” — what we know based on experience — and “Wissen,” what we know based on secondary information, such as books, the internet, and television. We know the oven is hot based on experience. We know the Earth revolves around the Sun based on secondary information. That’s one way of assigning a value to what we know. Erfahrung or Wissen. Primary and secondary. Where did we learn it? Is it based on direct experience or is it reported via someone else? And if the latter, do we trust the source? That’s just one way of looking at things. And since directly experiencing everything is all but impossible (not without incredible contacts and infinite time), we can’t purely rely on direct information. But we can use this informational hierarchy to figure out who to listen to. Listening to people with direct experience on a subject — like 55,000 medical practitioners for instance — might be more valuable than relying on a journalist or a news-aggregating algorithm, both of which are likely to be part of the centralised legacy media. Put another way: don’t let Google do your thinking for you. And remember Moab. Until next time, Nick O’Connor Contributor, Gilder’s Daily Prophecy $10 billion bet... this is a real winner [Big bet]( world’s second-richest man is ALL IN on his biggest bet yet. He’s already committed $10 billion to it. The way I see it... this is 1997 and the dawn of Amazon all over again. Back then, the retail industry was completely disrupted. This time around it’s another major $2 trillion industry that’s in the line of fire. Missed taking Advantage of Amazon? Don’t miss again. The stakes are huge. The Government has approved it. The timing is right. [It’s a Win Win Win situation. Click Here.]( [Three founders Publishing]( To end your Gilder's Daily Prophecy e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Gilder's Daily Prophecy, feel free to [click here](. If you are having trouble receiving your Gilder's Daily Prophecy subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting Gilder's Daily Prophecy](. Gilder's Daily Prophecy is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. Please read [our Privacy Statement.]( For any further comments or concerns please email us at GildersDailyProphecy@threefounderspublishing.com. Three Founders Publishing, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. Nothing in this e-mail should be considered personalized financial advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after online publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. © 2021 Three Founders Publishing, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This newsletter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Three Founders Publishing, LLC. EMAIL REFERENCE ID: 401GDPED01

EDM Keywords (251)

yet year wrote wrongly writers write would world work wonder witness wissen whole way warning wants want visit views verify value valuable use usa unfortunate understand unable tv trust true towards told timing thousands thinking think things tens tend television talk take suppress suggest subject story stephenson start stanford stakes speak source soul sort something solution signed sense see secondary searched scope scoff scientists science sadly ruin right reviewing respecting reported relying really readers read rank radio quite question put purposes protecting prospectus production problem printed present predict plot petition perhaps people part parallels oven ones one offer nuke novelist novel nietzsche new need must multiverse much moab mix miss military might media means mean mailing mailbox made lucky looking longer living listening listen line likely like life licensed letter let learn launch latter know kind journalist issue irony investors introducing internet information impossible important imagines idea hypocrisy huge hope home hoax heresy heard hear head happening happened happen hackable government going goes go give gilder get george front free following figure fertile fact face experts experience example even essay erfahrung epidemiologists ensure enough enjoyment englishman end employees emergence elsewhere election downplaying done disinformation discredit details destroyed demiurge deepfakes deemed declaration dealt dawn dangerous cuts created covered could core consulting consider connor communication committed comments comment collision closer clicking click clearly claim characterised change challenge case called books book blockchain beyond believing begin battle based back authorities assume assigning asked article arrival approved appears answers amazon align agreement agree address able 1997

Marketing emails from threefounderspublishing.com

View More
Sent On

17/10/2022

Sent On

16/10/2022

Sent On

16/10/2022

Sent On

15/10/2022

Sent On

15/10/2022

Sent On

14/10/2022

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.