Newsletter Subject

Poisoning the well

From

thinkprogress.org

Email Address

email@thinkprogress.org

Sent On

Sat, Mar 9, 2019 01:45 PM

Email Preheader Text

A big hello and thank you to our Care2 friends for joining our email list. This week, we reported on

A big hello and thank you to our Care2 friends for joining our email list. This week, we reported on topics ranging from debunking false talking points about the Green New Deal to elevating the frustration and anger that communities impacted by toxic chemicals feel towards the Trump administration. Thank you for your readership and your support. Toxic chemicals are poisoning communities, and those affected say EPA isn’t doing enough to stop it WASHINGTON, D.C. — When Hope Grosse was growing up in Warminster, Pennsylvania, she rarely thought about her home’s proximity to the Naval Air Warfare Center nearby, and how that might impact the safety of the water she drank and bathed in daily. Now 53 years old, Grosse was diagnosed with stage four cancer at age 25, shortly after her father died from brain cancer. The cause, she is certain, was the presence of chemicals found in the water, known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a group of man-made chemicals that are toxic to humans and can increase the risk of cancer, among other health risks. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been under mounting pressure to regulate and restrict the use of PFAS, but impacted communities say the government hasn’t done enough. And the Trump administration's close ties to the chemical industry is only adding further concern. [READ MORE]( [The Bloomberg bombshell the media missed]( [READ MORE]( [Trump’s rollbacks would increase CO2 emissions by more than 200 million tons annually, report finds]( [READ MORE]( [Republicans get history wrong by naming anti-Green New Deal caucus after Teddy Roosevelt]( [READ MORE]( [Coastal states mount bipartisan resistance as Trump forges ahead with offshore drilling plans]( [READ MORE]( [U.S.’s wettest winter on record is a ‘glimpse of the future under climate change’]( [READ MORE]( CAPAF | ThinkProgress Center for American Progress Action Fund 1333 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 United States This email was sent to{EMAIL}. [unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from thinkprogress.org

View More
Sent On

05/09/2019

Sent On

04/09/2019

Sent On

03/09/2019

Sent On

31/08/2019

Sent On

30/08/2019

Sent On

29/08/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.