Newsletter Subject

Do This Year's Oscars Represent History's Most Inclusive Lineup of Best Picture Nominees?

From

thewrap.com

Email Address

newsletter@thewrap.com

Sent On

Wed, Feb 21, 2024 12:06 AM

Email Preheader Text

Despite the much-discussed "Barbie" snubs, there appears to be an awful lot to celebrate By Jason Cl

Despite the much-discussed "Barbie" snubs, there appears to be an awful lot to celebrate [poor-things-oppenheimer-killers-of-the-flower-moon-barbie]( [Do This Year's Oscars Represent History’s Most Inclusive Lineup of Best Picture Nominees?]( By Jason Clark, Guest Awards Beat Columnist On Oscar nomination day in January, the narrative that grabbed all the attention had to do with “Barbie,” the year’s top-grossing film and a cultural phenomenon for the ages. It received eight nominations, including one for Margot Robbie for producing and a screenwriting nod for Greta Gerwig and her spouse, Noah Baumbach. But Robbie wasn’t nominated for Best Actress and Gerwig was passed over for Best Director, categories in which they were thought to be shoo-ins. Were the Robbie/Gerwig slights a bummer? Sure they were. But for anyone unfamiliar with the Oscar nominating process, it’s a matter of [numbers and ranked placement]( that often breaks a few hearts in the process. And it is possible that this story overshadowed a possibly larger, more significant one: that this could be the most inclusive, exciting, unconventional, big-and-small-budgeted Best Picture lineup in the Oscars’ 96-year history. A quick survey of this year’s Best Picture lineup unveils stories about the Black experience (“American Fiction”), the Native American experience (“Killers of the Flower Moon”) and the Asian and Asian-American experience (“Past Lives”). It includes movies in which [a character’s LGBTQ+ status]( is not an immediate reason for tragedy (“American Fiction,” “Anatomy of a Fall,” “Maestro,” “Poor Things”). And it contains stories of women exploring autonomy and self-worth in worlds — that can be interpreted as both real and unreal — dominated by men (“Barbie” and “Poor Things”). And even the more traditional Oscar-sounding films in the mix are not wholly conventional: “[The Holdovers](” dares its audiences to luxuriate in a 1970s-mood character drama and contains a sympathetic portrayal of a grieving, working-class Black woman as well as an adult and teen struggling with depression. “[The Zone of Interest](” deviates wildly from its source material to create an even more demanding, purposefully distanced look at the seemingly idyllic life of a Nazi family that lives just outside the wall of the Auschwitz concentration camp, where the father oversees the camp’s atrocities. (If that’s not timely in 2024, nothing is.) And even though “Oppenheimer” is a biopic by no less a powerhouse than Christopher Nolan, it was a massive gamble that could have backfired spectacularly if it didn’t connect with audiences. It illustrates thorny, unheroic human weakness, while its techniques and visuals are not presented for easy digestibility. A quick survey of Twitter will tell you that opinions differ wildly on all of these films. The gnarly discourse sometimes yields a few salient points, chiefly that cinema still needs to tell all of these stories from even more uniquely personal and diverse points of view. But since the 2009 expansion of the Best Picture nominees, which — ironically enough — was sparked by the sting of Nolan’s “The Dark Knight” not making the Best Picture cut that year, one would be hard-pressed to find a lineup so diverse and so illustrative of the filmmakers’ passions. Even the snob factor is greatly reduced for the second year in a row: After 2022’s two top international grossers, “Avatar: The Way of Water” and “Top Gun: Maverick,” made the Best Picture cut, both “Barbie” (2023’s champ) and “Oppenheimer” (its third-place grosser) are there. And history will show that there were definitely not as many cosplay Mavericks and Na’vi in attendance at theaters in 2022 as there were Oppys and Barbies (and Kens) in 2023. Oscar debates and gripes are all part of the fun and why everyone always comes back for more. But as “Steel Magnolias”’ Truvy Jones once said, why don’t we just focus on the joy of the situation? One need only refer to Dua Lipa’s “Barbie” anthem “[Dance the Night](” (which the Academy overlooked despite it being perhaps the most ubiquitous pop song of 2023) for the right frame of mind before everyone gets back to the hard work of stomping out injustices. This resonance will read loud and clear on that red carpet on March 10: “Even when the tears are flowin’ like diamonds on my face/I’ll still keep the party goin’, not one hair out of place.” This story first appeared in the Down to the Wire issue of TheWrap’s awards magazine.  [Read more of the Down to the Wire issue here](. [Read More]( --------------------------------------------------------------- [Wrap Pro logo] Discover why entertainment executives and professionals rely on the WrapPRO platform daily for exclusive coverage, analysis, deeper reporting, and access to VIP events & screenings throughout the year. [Subscribe Today]( --------------------------------------------------------------- [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Instagram]( [YouTube]( TheWrap | 2034 Armacost Ave Los Angeles, CA 90025 [Preferences]( | [Unsubscribe]( [LiveIntent Logo]( [AdChoices Logo](

Marketing emails from thewrap.com

View More
Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.