Newsletter Subject

Steve Pond: Emmy Voters Face the Usual Dilemma of Too Many Nominations for Too Few Shows

From

thewrap.com

Email Address

newsletter@thewrap.com

Sent On

Fri, Aug 9, 2024 05:35 PM

Email Preheader Text

More than 35% of this year's acting nominations went to only four shows When final voting for the 76

More than 35% of this year's acting nominations went to only four shows [Emmy Voters Face the Usual Dilemma: Too Many Nominations for Too Few Shows]( [Emmy Award statuettes]( When final voting for the 76th Primetime Emmy Awards begins next Thursday, the 20,000-plus voting members of the Television Academy will be put in the position of essentially deciding a bunch of family squabbles. Two lead actors from “Only Murders in the Building,” Steve Martin and Martin Short, will be competing against each other in one category. Two actresses from “The Morning Show,” Jennifer Aniston and Reese Witherspoon, will face off in another. Two from “The Bear” in two different categories, three from that show in another. Two from “Shogun” here, two from “Abbott Elementary” there. Three from “The Morning Show” in the supporting actor in a drama series category, and four (out of seven) from that show in supporting actress. Those last stats led to an email that hit my inbox a few hours after the Emmy nominations were announced on July 17. It came from a voting lobbyist I’d met years ago when his support for ranked-choice voting in political elections dovetailed with my interest in the way the Oscars uses that voting system for its nominations. The subject line of his email read “Emmys nominations and approval voting again at work! Morning Show has 7 of 14 supporting actor/actress nominations,” and the email itself started this way: “And so it continues!” And so it did. For years, Emmy voters have had the habit of showering a handful of programs with lots of acting nominations, culminating in 2022 and 2023, when “Succession” set a new record for a series with 14 acting noms and then equaled that record the following year. This year wasn’t quite as blatant, with the top two shows, “The Bear” and “The Morning Show,” landing 10 acting nominations each — but it still had some jaw-dropping consequences, such as the latter show’s dominance in the supporting categories. It led to an email chain between the ranked-choice advocate, me and a former voting coordinator for the Oscars. I pointed out that the “Morning Show” stats were far from the only examples at this year’s Emmys: “Mr. & Mrs. Smith” grabbed five of the 10 nomination slots in the guest acting categories in drama, while “The Bear” took five of the 12 in guest comedy acting. Overall, 27 different programs received acting nominations, but the top four of those shows got more than 35% of all the nominations, and the top seven shows had more nominations than the next 20. “Remarkable numbers!” replied the voting maven. “I assume some decision makers are taking notice.” But to quote a melancholy Dane: “Ay, there’s the rub.” The decision-makers at the Television Academy have taken notice — a couple of years ago, when the category-hogging seemed to be aided by Emmy rules that allowed voters to cast their ballots for an unlimited number of contenders. So the Emmys changed the rules: Beginning last year, if a category qualified for five nominees, an Academy member could only click on five names on his or her ballot; if it had seven nominees, you could pick seven. On paper, that might have encouraged voters to spread the love a little more, and to be less inclined to dump all their votes on the same shows. In practice, though, it didn’t seem to change anything. “Succession” got 14 acting noms before the rule changed and it got 14 after the rule changed.  [Read the rest of Steve Pond’s Awards Beat column here.]( [Read More]( --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- [WrapPRO logo] Discover why entertainment executives and professionals rely on the WrapPRO platform daily for exclusive coverage, analysis, deeper reporting, and access to VIP events & screenings throughout the year. [Subscribe Today]( --------------------------------------------------------------- [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Instagram]( [YouTube]( TheWrap | 2034 Armacost Ave Los Angeles, CA 90025 [Preferences]( | [Unsubscribe]( [LiveIntent Logo]( [AdChoices Logo](

Marketing emails from thewrap.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.