[📚Thursday Recharge] The “Monster” Study (Medical Experimentation) ➕ Scientific Malpractice

Also Inside: Lockdown Files + Crimes in Guatemala If you are having trouble viewing this email, [click here.]( Thursday, August 17, 2023  Happy Thursday, {NAME}.  On this day in 2007, six surviving subjects of the infamous "Monster Study" received a collective settlement of $925,000 from the state of Iowa as compensation for the emotional and psychological trauma they experienced during the study. The "Monster Study" was an experiment on stuttering conducted in 1939 by speech pathologist Wendell Johnson and his graduate student, Mary Tudor, at the University of Iowa. The study was dubbed the "Monster Study" due to the monstrous nature of the experiments, which involved conducting unethical psychological manipulation on orphaned children.  The study involved 22 children, 10 of whom were already diagnosed with stuttering, and 12 of whom were considered to be non-stuttering. The children were divided into four groups, with two groups being subjected to negative speech therapy, where they were criticized for every minor speech imperfection, and two groups receiving positive speech therapy, where they were praised for their speech fluency. The results of the study were tragic, as several of the children in the negative speech therapy groups developed speech problems that persisted throughout their lives, even though they had no prior history of stuttering. The study was never published and was only publicly disclosed in 2001.  The "Monster Study" violated multiple ethical principles, particularly the principle of informed consent. The Nuremberg Code, established in 1947 after the Nuremberg Trials, stipulates that human subjects must provide voluntary, informed consent before participating in any research study. In the case of the "Monster Study," the children were orphans, and it is doubtful that they provided informed consent, or even understood the potential risks involved. Additionally, the experiments inflicted psychological harm on the children, violating the ethical principle of avoiding harm to research subjects.  Unfortunately, the "Monster Study" is just one example of unethical human experiments that have been conducted in the US in the name of science. Throughout history, there have been numerous instances where researchers have disregarded ethical principles in pursuit of scientific knowledge. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, the experiments on unwitting subjects with LSD by the CIA, and the radiation experiments conducted on humans during the Cold War era are some of the many examples of unethical research practices. These incidents highlight the importance of adhering to ethical standards in scientific research to protect the rights and well-being of human subjects.  As the fallout of COVID-19 shots becomes more clear, we can see that the government, scientific communities, and medical mafia have continued using unwitting Americans as veritable “guinea pigs” to test new drugs, vaccines, and therapies. Today, we’re bringing you a few of those stories.  Let’s dive in!  How Unethical Experiments Have Defined Modern Medicine  Medicine is a modern marvel. The creation and discovery of numerous drugs, therapies, and surgical interventions has undoubtedly saved the lives of millions of Americans. Where would we be without penicillin or appendectomies? Even our ability to sterilize wounds and prevent infection has drastically increased the average lifespan.  But not all treatments are created equal. For every breakthrough, lifesaving discovery, dozens more turn out to be harmful, ineffective, or even deadly. Perhaps more important than the discoveries themselves is the way in which they were discovered.   For nearly as long as modern medicine has existed, so have egregious ethical violations. When you hear the term “medical experimentation,” your mind may recall the horrendous experiments conducted in Nazi Germany on Jews, communists, homosexuals, and an assortment of other “undesirables” under the Third Reich. While these experiments were undoubtedly appalling, they were neither the first nor the last of their kind.  In fact, the history of unethical experiments in the United States is long and harrowing. Children, soldiers, minorities, prisoners, and even entire cities have been forcibly or unknowingly subjected to dangerous, cruel, and often lethal experiments… all in the name of science.  >> [The Scientific Crime Syndicate]( <<   Profits Over Patients: Money, Medicine, and the Guatemala Experiment  During World War II, the military was losing the equivalent of two divisions a year due to venereal disease – roughly 350,000 soldiers – at a cost of $34 million. This led to a major push for research into ways to treat and prevent sexually transmitted diseases like gonorrhea and syphilis. The recent discovery of penicillin was a major focus of these studies.  In 1943, the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) conducted studies on inmates at Terre Haute penitentiary in Indiana. Dr. Thomas Parran Jr., the Surgeon General at the time, was a major contributor to the campaign researching effects and treatments of sexually transmitted diseases. The study included 241 inmates, who were paid $100 and received a commendation letter submitted to the parole board. These inmates were injected with several strains of gonorrhea and used to study the effects and potential treatments associated with the disease.  It is said to be the first U.S. study to infect human subjects with a dangerous contagion. Among others, Dr. John Charles Cutler helped lead the experiments. The study is now considered a violation of medical and human rights ethics.   Fast-forward to 1946, when U.S. researchers began perhaps one of the greatest ethical violations in American history in a study in Guatemala. Funded by a grant from the NIH, the study included 1,308 human subjects and sought to learn more about STD treatment and prevention.  But unlike Terre Haute, where subjects gave informed consent, or Tuskegee, where patients were already infected, the Guatemala experiment deliberately infected thousands of human subjects with syphilis either against their will or without their knowledge.  Led by chief PHS physician John Cutler and funded by the NIH (both of which are departments of HHS), the Guatemala experiment was undoubtedly a U.S. endeavor. And the lack of ethics was not lost on those involved. In fact, Dr. Parran, still Surgeon General at the time, acknowledged that the study could never take place on U.S. soil.  The subjects were among the most vulnerable populations, including prison inmates, orphans, soldiers, prostitutes, and patients at a nearby mental hospital. These subjects included children as young as 10 years old.  >> [Torture & Terror in Guatemala]( <<   Lockdown Files Reveal Psychological Warfare Waged by UK Health Officials  The Lockdown Files are a series of WhatsApp messages between Matt Hancock and various other government officials, MPs, and advisors. They were leaked to The Daily Telegraph and they paint a pretty damning picture of Hancock and his approach to dealing with the pandemic.  From what we can gather from these messages, Hancock was more interested in manipulating the public than he was in actually keeping them safe. He wanted to use fear to keep people in line and to make them more compliant with lockdown measures.  One of the most shocking revelations to come out of the Lockdown Files is that Hancock apparently wanted to use a new variant of COVID-19 to frighten people into complying with lockdown measures. In one message, he wrote, “The new variant is a potential game-changer, but we need to make sure everyone is scared enough to do what we say.”   One of the key takeaways from “The Lockdown Files” is that the government was more concerned with maintaining its grip on power than with the welfare of the people it was supposed to serve. This kind of behavior only reinforces the public’s worst suspicions about politicians and government officials. It also undermines confidence in the government’s handling of the pandemic, which could make it more difficult for officials to implement public health measures in the future.  Mike Adams summed it up well when he said:  “What Hancock and his staffers did is an admission that the entire covid plandemic was, in fact, contrived from the very start. From its inception, the plandemic has always been a weaponized conspiracy against the people.”  >> [Scared Into Submission]( <<  “We frighten the pants off everyone with the new strain… When do we deploy the new variant?” ― Matt Hancock   To Your Health & Liberty,  © Copyright 2022, TTAC Publishing LLC, All Rights Reserved. This email was sent to {EMAIL} by info@thetruthaboutcancer.com PO Box 530, Portland, TN 37148 [Edit Profile]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Report Spam](