[📚Thursday Recharge] Nobel Prize Summit Mentions TTAC & TTAV ➕ Pesticides & Pregnancy

Also Inside: How the Law Protects Big Pharma Thursday, July 6, 2023  Happy Thursday, {NAME}!  115 years ago today, on July 6th, 1908, American explorer Robert E. Peary embarked on a daring journey that would etch his name into the annals of history. His expedition, known today as the Peary Arctic Expedition, was the culmination of his lifelong pursuit and a testament to human courage, curiosity, and the insatiable urge to explore the unknown. Set on a mission to reach the North Pole, a feat that had eluded humankind for centuries, Peary and his team dared to venture where no one had trod before.  Peary's expedition to the North Pole represents a quintessential example of humanity's relentless drive to push the boundaries of our known world. Throughout history, mankind has demonstrated a proclivity for exploration, continually seeking new horizons and boldly stepping into uncharted territories. From early migration to modern space travel, this ceaseless quest for discovery is a defining trait of our human identity.  This insatiable curiosity about our surroundings has played a vital role in our survival and growth. It's through exploration that we've discovered new lands, resources, and technologies that have not only ensured our survival but also enabled us to flourish. Exploration has broadened our understanding of the world, nurtured our creativity, and driven us to innovate, all of which has catalyzed the progress of human civilization.  Furthermore, exploration encourages independence. When venturing into the unknown, we must rely on our skills, courage, and resourcefulness. Just as Peary and his team had to depend on their survival instincts, navigational skills, and adaptability in the harsh Arctic environment, we too foster our independence when we navigate unfamiliar territories, whether literal or metaphorical.  As we celebrate the 115th anniversary of Peary's daring expedition, it reminds us of the importance of exploration, curiosity, and the courage to ask questions. Each of us is, in a sense, an explorer, charting our unique course through life. As we journey forward, let us continue to be curious, to question, and to explore, for it is this spirit of inquiry and discovery that propels us forward. Just as Peary's expedition was pivotal in our understanding of the world, our own explorations contribute to our personal growth, survival, and independence. As we stand on the brink of new frontiers, from the depths of our oceans to the far reaches of outer space, may we never cease to ask questions and seek answers. After all, this is not merely a human characteristic; it is the essence of our humanity.  Let’s dive in…  Recurring Pregnancy Loss Linked to Pesticide Exposure  A recent study published in Scientific Reports has established a disturbing connection between exposure to pesticides and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). RPL, defined as the loss of three or more consecutive pregnancies before 24 weeks of gestation, points to an underlying reproductive health issue. According to the research, the endocrine-disrupting (ED) properties of pesticides can negatively impact several biological processes, including reproduction.   Pesticides are nearly ubiquitous in our environment. Previous studies indicate that dietary exposure is the main source of these chemicals in our bodies, though humans are likely to encounter hundreds to thousands of other chemicals. Even though many countries have banned organochlorine compounds, these substances linger in our soils, water, and air, often exceeding safety standards set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These chemicals have a profound impact on both environmental and biological health, including triggering endocrine disruption, reproductive/birth problems, and neurotoxicity.  Pregnancy is a particularly susceptible stage for pesticide exposure. Compounds found in a mother’s blood can transfer to the fetus via the umbilical cord. A 2021 study discovered over 100 different chemicals in the blood and umbilical cord samples of pregnant women, some of which were from unidentified sources or previously undetectable in humans. Early exposure during pregnancy can have severe, long-term implications, including increased risk of rare fetal disorders like holoprosencephaly, abnormalities, and increased risk of diseases such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).  >> [Pesticides & Pregnancy]( <<   Nobel Prize Summit Mentions TTAC & TTAV!  Charlene recently did an interview with Brannon Howse on LindellTV. Apparently, Melissa Fleming recently gave a speech at the Nobel Prize Summit where she accused us of “infecting the minds of millions” with “disinformation” about vaccines. Heck, they even put our picture up on the big screen. [surprise]   The United Nations Development Programme had significant participation this year at the Nobel Prize Summit, which gathered Nobel laureates, policymakers, members of the public, and global leaders in the arts and sciences from 24-26 May in Washington DC.  The summit, co-hosted by the Nobel Foundation and National Academy of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, allegedly addressed “Truth, Trust and Hope” and “tackling misinformation” - which is quite ironic since they were spreading falsehoods and misinformation and slandering us and other members of the “disinformation dozen.”  >> [Check out the interview]( <   Medicinal Justice: How the Law Protects Big Pharma & Harms Victims (Part 2)  In the [first part of our series](, we explored the legal framework that protects pharmaceutical companies from lawsuits when their drugs cause adverse side effects. The principles of preemption, court rulings such as Wyeth v. Levine, and the Hatch-Waxman Act all contribute to an environment where it can be difficult for patients to seek legal recourse. As we saw in the case of Singulair, a popular asthma medication, these laws and regulations can even discourage pharmaceutical companies from conducting further safety research on their drugs. In Part 2, we’ll continue our examination by delving deeper into the complex relationship between the FDA and the pharmaceutical industry and the implications this relationship has for legal battles involving drug safety.  The legal and regulatory landscape surrounding drug safety has, in many ways, favored pharmaceutical companies. The interplay of court precedents, laws such as the Hatch-Waxman Act, and regulatory decisions by the FDA provides a protective shield to these companies, even when questions about the safety of their drugs emerge. The implications are profound for patients who suffer adverse effects from drugs. They face significant hurdles in seeking legal recourse, while pharmaceutical companies can often evade responsibility, especially if the drug in question is a generic version. >> [FDA Interactions and their Role in Legal Precedents]( <<   “Find a way or make one.” —Robert Peary  To Your Health & Liberty,  © Copyright 2022, TTAC Publishing LLC, All Rights Reserved. This email was sent to {EMAIL} by info@thetruthaboutcancer.com PO Box 530, Portland, TN 37148 [Edit Profile]( | [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Report Spam](