Newsletter Subject

Eastern Promises

From

thesgnl.email

Email Address

newsletters@thesgnl.email

Sent On

Sun, Mar 26, 2023 11:03 PM

Email Preheader Text

What does it mean that former enemies Iran and Saudi Arabia are now cooperating—thanks to China

What does it mean that former enemies Iran and Saudi Arabia are now cooperating—thanks to China? Steven Cook on appearances and reality in a changing Middle East. Eastern Promises What does it mean that former enemies Iran and Saudi Arabia are now cooperating—thanks to China? Steven Cook on appearances and reality in a changing Middle East. Ivy Gould / The Signal After decades of insults, threats, and proxy conflicts around the Middle East, Iran and Saudi Arabia announced an agreement on March 10 to restore diplomatic relations. The announcement was surprising, not least because the agreement was brokered by China—and with no involvement from the United States, the pre-eminent power in the region since the end of the Cold War. Saudi Arabia and Iran themselves have been enemies since 1979, when Iran’s Islamic Revolution toppled the shah—a staunch U.S. ally—and the Revolution’s supporters started chanting Death to America and threatening Washington’s partners in the region, including the Saudis. Meanwhile, China has been developing its ties in the Middle East for years now. But openly mediating a new diplomatic pact between two of the region’s biggest powers—a pact that will see them reopen embassies, revive a security agreement, and reestablish economic and cultural ties—would seem a major turning point. What’s going on here? Steven Cook is a senior fellow for Middle East and Africa Studies based in Washington with the Council on Foreign Relations. To Cook, the new agreement isn’t as surprising, or shocking to the constellation of power in the Middle East, as it might seem. Behind all their conflict, the Iranians and the Saudis have been finding gradually more and stronger incentives to put their differences aside; they needed help settling them; and China was at hand and happy to give it. The development shows how radically the position of the United States in the Middle East has changed over the past 30 years—but, Cook says, the Chinese aren’t simply replacing the Americans in the region; something altogether new is taking shape. Sean Nangle: What’s just happened in the Middle East? Steven Cook: The global perception of what’s happened is interesting to start with. There’s been a tendency to see the Iranian-Saudi deal as the mark of a sudden and dramatic shift in the region. After all, Washington has been highly focused on the global challenge from China; the media—U.S. and international—has been highly focused on Washington being highly focused on the global challenge from China; and then, all of a sudden, it comes out that China has brokered a grand bargain between, of all countries, Iran and Saudi Arabia. Yet if you look at the substance of the deal, it’s an agreement to reestablish diplomatic relations between Tehran and Riyadh. The substance isn’t unprecedented. In the current environment, it may have been a little too easy for commentators in the media to lose sight of the fact that Iran and Saudi Arabia have maintained diplomatic relations before—through some very frosty and tension-filled years, at that. Okay, not in the last six years, so something important has happened here. And okay, the deal was brokered by the Chinese. That’s new—and undoubtedly something important too, because it shows that Beijing is now a real factor in the Middle East. But we have to remember, if anyone was going to broker this deal, it wasn’t going to be the United States—because the United States doesn’t talk to Iran. Advertisement So I’m not sure we can say any of this reflects a sudden change in the Middle East. What it does reflect, though, is a striking moment in an ongoing evolution of the region’s geopolitics. Which is to say, in a waning of the time when America was truly predominant, when it had no real peer competitor—no near-peer competitor—in more or less the 20-years between 1991 and 2011. What the new deal reflects is that this time is well over. And now there are options for countries in the region looking for diplomatic brokers other than Washington. Nangle: Iran and Saudi Arabia have had, as you say, a frosty and tension-filled relationship, going back more than 40 years—to Iran’s Islamic Revolution in 1979. Iran has since staked a lot of its regional and international reputation on resistance to the U.S. and its allies, with the Saudis being one of the most prominent among them. Why would Iran want to reestablish diplomatic relations now? Cook: In the days after the deal, the Iranian media was very chirpy about the whole thing—making a lot of the meetings that would now take place on the road to reestablishing diplomatic relations, the Iranian delegations that would now be going to the United Arab Emirates, and so on. It was clear to me, listening, that this wasn’t just propaganda or posturing. You could see an emerging sense that establishing diplomatic relations with the Saudis now is a powerful way to drive a wedge between them and the Americans—Saudi Arabia being the big dog in the Gulf; being such close allies with the U.S. over the years; and now being closer than ever to Israel, as Israel continues to [normalize relations with its Arab neighbors]( all around. Of course, the Iranians know there were already divisions between the Saudis and the Americans, but you can see in the Iranian response a view that the deal could help them exploit these divisions—in ways that will redound to Iran’s benefit. At the same time, the Iranians have been long on the ropes economically and with their population domestically—and the potential for Saudi and Emirati investment is very alluring. It also creates the opportunity to explore new deals with the Chinese, who’ve been bailing the Iranians out with investment, supporting China’s further prominence in the region—to the further disadvantage of the United States. Ivy Gould / The Signal More from Steven Cook at The Signal: “More than anything, the Saudis really, really want to get themselves out of the civil war in Yemen, where they and the Iranians have been supporting opposing sides as proxies since 2014. If relations with the Iranians improve, and there’s dialogue, it raises the chances of being able to withdraw. The Saudis know now what a mistake it was to get involved in Yemen; they know the Iranians and the Houthis—the ethnic group leading one side of the civil war, backed by the Iranians—have shared an interest in keeping them pinned down there; and they know the United States hasn’t been able to extricate them. The Saudis don’t know, yet, if the Iranians are going to cooperate on account of the new deal. But they do know the odds have now gone up.” “The Chinese have their own incentives. What’s really in it for them is that they’re very serious about their neutrality in the Middle East, and they very much want the region to be stable, so they can pursue their mercantilist policies—meaning state support for Chinese firms, Chinese exports, and China’s currency. They don’t want two of their biggest oil suppliers to be at odds, undermining the stability of the region, and potentially disrupting the flow of oil to China. If all of this comes at the expense of the United States, that may be an added benefit for Beijing. But they’re much more interested in ensuring that the region remains stable and that they continue to get oil they want from it.” “It seems to me, the picture taking shape here isn’t going to be so much about the ups and downs of the United States and the Chinese. It’s going to be about how the partners of the U.S. and the Chinese in the region are becoming more adept at playing both sides. I’ve heard representatives of Middle Eastern countries say as much in the region, myself: This isn’t our grandfather’s Middle East. We have agency. We’re going to order this region on our own. And we’re going to pursue our interests as we see fit; we’re not going to let outsiders do it for us.” [Continue reading ...]( [The Signal]( explores urgent questions in current events around the world—to support it and for full access: [Subscribe now]( The Signal | 1717 N St. NW, Washington, DC 20011 [Unsubscribe {EMAIL}]( [Constant Contact Data Notice]( Sent by newsletters@thesgnl.email

Marketing emails from thesgnl.email

View More
Sent On

25/01/2024

Sent On

18/01/2024

Sent On

11/01/2024

Sent On

04/01/2024

Sent On

21/12/2023

Sent On

07/12/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.