What does it mean that former enemies Iran and Saudi Arabia are now cooperatingâthanks to China? Steven Cook on appearances and reality in a changing Middle East. Eastern Promises What does it mean that former enemies Iran and Saudi Arabia are now cooperatingâthanks to China? Steven Cook on appearances and reality in a changing Middle East. Ivy Gould / The Signal After decades of insults, threats, and proxy conflicts around the Middle East, Iran and Saudi Arabia announced an agreement on March 10 to restore diplomatic relations. The announcement was surprising, not least because the agreement was brokered by Chinaâand with no involvement from the United States, the pre-eminent power in the region since the end of the Cold War. Saudi Arabia and Iran themselves have been enemies since 1979, when Iranâs Islamic Revolution toppled the shahâa staunch U.S. allyâand the Revolutionâs supporters started chanting Death to America and threatening Washingtonâs partners in the region, including the Saudis. Meanwhile, China has been developing its ties in the Middle East for years now. But openly mediating a new diplomatic pact between two of the regionâs biggest powersâa pact that will see them reopen embassies, revive a security agreement, and reestablish economic and cultural tiesâwould seem a major turning point. Whatâs going on here? Steven Cook is a senior fellow for Middle East and Africa Studies based in Washington with the Council on Foreign Relations. To Cook, the new agreement isnât as surprising, or shocking to the constellation of power in the Middle East, as it might seem. Behind all their conflict, the Iranians and the Saudis have been finding gradually more and stronger incentives to put their differences aside; they needed help settling them; and China was at hand and happy to give it. The development shows how radically the position of the United States in the Middle East has changed over the past 30 yearsâbut, Cook says, the Chinese arenât simply replacing the Americans in the region; something altogether new is taking shape. Sean Nangle: Whatâs just happened in the Middle East? Steven Cook: The global perception of whatâs happened is interesting to start with. Thereâs been a tendency to see the Iranian-Saudi deal as the mark of a sudden and dramatic shift in the region. After all, Washington has been highly focused on the global challenge from China; the mediaâU.S. and internationalâhas been highly focused on Washington being highly focused on the global challenge from China; and then, all of a sudden, it comes out that China has brokered a grand bargain between, of all countries, Iran and Saudi Arabia. Yet if you look at the substance of the deal, itâs an agreement to reestablish diplomatic relations between Tehran and Riyadh. The substance isnât unprecedented. In the current environment, it may have been a little too easy for commentators in the media to lose sight of the fact that Iran and Saudi Arabia have maintained diplomatic relations beforeâthrough some very frosty and tension-filled years, at that. Okay, not in the last six years, so something important has happened here. And okay, the deal was brokered by the Chinese. Thatâs newâand undoubtedly something important too, because it shows that Beijing is now a real factor in the Middle East. But we have to remember, if anyone was going to broker this deal, it wasnât going to be the United Statesâbecause the United States doesnât talk to Iran. Advertisement So Iâm not sure we can say any of this reflects a sudden change in the Middle East. What it does reflect, though, is a striking moment in an ongoing evolution of the regionâs geopolitics. Which is to say, in a waning of the time when America was truly predominant, when it had no real peer competitorâno near-peer competitorâin more or less the 20-years between 1991 and 2011. What the new deal reflects is that this time is well over. And now there are options for countries in the region looking for diplomatic brokers other than Washington. Nangle: Iran and Saudi Arabia have had, as you say, a frosty and tension-filled relationship, going back more than 40 yearsâto Iranâs Islamic Revolution in 1979. Iran has since staked a lot of its regional and international reputation on resistance to the U.S. and its allies, with the Saudis being one of the most prominent among them. Why would Iran want to reestablish diplomatic relations now? Cook: In the days after the deal, the Iranian media was very chirpy about the whole thingâmaking a lot of the meetings that would now take place on the road to reestablishing diplomatic relations, the Iranian delegations that would now be going to the United Arab Emirates, and so on. It was clear to me, listening, that this wasnât just propaganda or posturing. You could see an emerging sense that establishing diplomatic relations with the Saudis now is a powerful way to drive a wedge between them and the AmericansâSaudi Arabia being the big dog in the Gulf; being such close allies with the U.S. over the years; and now being closer than ever to Israel, as Israel continues to [normalize relations with its Arab neighbors]( all around. Of course, the Iranians know there were already divisions between the Saudis and the Americans, but you can see in the Iranian response a view that the deal could help them exploit these divisionsâin ways that will redound to Iranâs benefit. At the same time, the Iranians have been long on the ropes economically and with their population domesticallyâand the potential for Saudi and Emirati investment is very alluring. It also creates the opportunity to explore new deals with the Chinese, whoâve been bailing the Iranians out with investment, supporting Chinaâs further prominence in the regionâto the further disadvantage of the United States. Ivy Gould / The Signal More from Steven Cook at The Signal: âMore than anything, the Saudis really, really want to get themselves out of the civil war in Yemen, where they and the Iranians have been supporting opposing sides as proxies since 2014. If relations with the Iranians improve, and thereâs dialogue, it raises the chances of being able to withdraw. The Saudis know now what a mistake it was to get involved in Yemen; they know the Iranians and the Houthisâthe ethnic group leading one side of the civil war, backed by the Iraniansâhave shared an interest in keeping them pinned down there; and they know the United States hasnât been able to extricate them. The Saudis donât know, yet, if the Iranians are going to cooperate on account of the new deal. But they do know the odds have now gone up.â âThe Chinese have their own incentives. Whatâs really in it for them is that theyâre very serious about their neutrality in the Middle East, and they very much want the region to be stable, so they can pursue their mercantilist policiesâmeaning state support for Chinese firms, Chinese exports, and Chinaâs currency. They donât want two of their biggest oil suppliers to be at odds, undermining the stability of the region, and potentially disrupting the flow of oil to China. If all of this comes at the expense of the United States, that may be an added benefit for Beijing. But theyâre much more interested in ensuring that the region remains stable and that they continue to get oil they want from it.â âIt seems to me, the picture taking shape here isnât going to be so much about the ups and downs of the United States and the Chinese. Itâs going to be about how the partners of the U.S. and the Chinese in the region are becoming more adept at playing both sides. Iâve heard representatives of Middle Eastern countries say as much in the region, myself: This isnât our grandfatherâs Middle East. We have agency. Weâre going to order this region on our own. And weâre going to pursue our interests as we see fit; weâre not going to let outsiders do it for us.â [Continue reading ...]( [The Signal]( explores urgent questions in current events around the worldâto support it and for full access: [Subscribe now]( The Signal | 1717 N St. NW, Washington, DC 20011 [Unsubscribe {EMAIL}](
[Constant Contact Data Notice](
Sent by newsletters@thesgnl.email