Newsletter Subject

Storms in the Old World

From

thesgnl.email

Email Address

newsletters@thesgnl.email

Sent On

Mon, Mar 7, 2022 12:37 AM

Email Preheader Text

How did Vladimir Putin get away with it for so long? Garry Kasparov on one former Soviet intelligenc

How did Vladimir Putin get away with it for so long? Garry Kasparov on one former Soviet intelligence officer’s domination of the world’s largest country. Publishing in public beta since 2021, The Signal has looked at the challenges to democracy in the world as a central theme—and the evolution of the Putin regime in Russia as a key aspect of it. Recently, we spoke with Garry Kasparov about how this regime has worked, and what’s enabled it, for a generation. Under Control Why did no one seem to care when Vladimir Putin stole Russia’s election last year? Garry Kasparov on how one former Soviet intelligence officer has dominated the world’s largest country. (Originally published 2021 | 09.24) As soon as Russia’s parliamentary election results were announced on September 20, 2021, opposition parties, independent observers, and Western countries decried blatant ballot-stuffing to favor President Vladimir Putin’s party, United Russia. Election authorities credited the party with about 50 percent of the national vote, despite preliminary results and pre-election polling projecting a far lower tally. The distribution of votes allowed United Russia to maintain a constitutional majority in the Duma, Russia’s legislature. Protests against the vote-rigging were nearly nonexistent, as the only party to organize a demonstration defending free and fair elections was, in a historical irony, the Communist Party. And despite criticism of the tainted vote from the United States and the European Union, democratic countries spared Putin any repercussions from stealing the election. Why didn’t he face any international consequences—or even any significant opposition in Russia—for falsifying election results? Garry Kasparov, one of the greatest chess players in history, is a longtime Putin critic who fled Russia in 2013 and now serves as the chairman of the Human Rights Foundation. In Kasparov’s view, Putin’s power in Russia has been almost untouchable, regardless of the level of public support he might have. He controls an enormous financial arsenal, including the country’s entire budget, filled with revenue from gas and oil exports, and he has the obedience of the country’s oligarchs. Western European democracies have shied away from confronting Putin, Kasparov explains, because they depend on Russia for natural gas, a dependence reinforced by the recently completed Nord Stream 2 pipelines—which were set to transport gas directly from Russia to Germany under the Baltic Sea, until Germany froze the project two weeks ago. As Kasparov sees it, the years leading up to the invasion of Ukraine were a phase of retreat from U.S. global engagement, which has helped leave autocrats like Putin secure. ——— Michael Bluhm: What happened in the elections? Garry Kasparov: When you use the word elections in Russia, you have to put it in quotation marks, because it’s not elections. It’s a charade. It’s a decoration. Fifteen years ago, the organization I founded there—the United Civil Front—declared that the regime would never change through the ballot. People pointed at us and said, Radicals! They want revolution. We were pragmatists. We knew that, once KGB, always KGB. With the worsening economic situation, growing dissatisfaction and apathy, and a rejection of the regime’s policies, they have to add more and more fraudulent votes to their tally. The latest report I saw from experts said that United Russia got an extra 14 million votes. That’s 50 percent of what they got overall. It shows that there’s no bottom. As Joseph Stalin used to say, It doesn’t matter how you vote. What’s important is who counts. It’s very important for the free world to understand that it’s a charade, and it has nothing to do with the will of the Russian people. Russia is a one-man dictatorship, and the dictator finds it convenient to use this procedure to keep some democratic decorations to cover his dictatorial powers. [Advertisement]( Advertisement More from Garry Kasparov at The Signal: “The main source of his power is the money he controls. We can say with certainty that Putin controls more money than any other individual in human history. The funds that he could move probably reach over $1 trillion. When you start looking at the Russian budget, and all the funds that are under the control of the Russian government, and some of the oligarchs’ fortunes that naturally will follow Putin’s orders, it’s an insane amount of money.” “Putin knows that he can buy almost anyone. He is not shy to use this enormous financial power to buy favors, politicians, and businesspeople. Look at the influence that Putin exercises outside of Russia—if you told me 20 years ago that the KGB would be able to control so many layers of political, economic, and social life in the free world, I would have laughed in your face.” “The regime is getting more repressive. Anyone expressing his or her opinion about it, even with a tweet—or a retweet—can be prosecuted. You can spend two years in jail for a tweet if a local party boss or local KGB chief decides that it hurts him.” ——— Meanwhile [Under Pressure]( How did a gas pipeline from Russia to Germany become central to the fate of Ukraine? Anatol Lieven on the intense game of diplomacy going on with Moscow, Berlin, Washington, and Kyiv. [Same as the Old Boss]( Why are elected authoritarians losing public support? Steven Levitsky on how voter frustration is turning against them. [Bridges to Nowhere]( Is China in danger of financial collapse? Victor Shih on the huge structural risks underlying the economy of the People’s Republic. To support The Signal—and for full access: This Week [Chaos and Consequences]( Anders Åslund on the shock of global isolation and the escalating risk of economic ruin for Russia [Sources of Power]( David L. Goldwyn on what Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is doing to the world’s energy supplies [Whole World Watching]( Angeli Datt on how the war on Ukraine looks in China ——— This email address is unmonitored; please send questions or comments [here](mailto:mail@thesgnl.com) To advertise with The Signal: advertise@thesgnl.com Add us to your [address book](mailto:newsletters@thesgnl.email) © 2022 The Signal The Signal | 717 N St. NW, Ste. One, Washington, DC 20011 [Unsubscribe {EMAIL}]( [Constant Contact Data Notice]( Sent by newsletters@thesgnl.email

Marketing emails from thesgnl.email

View More
Sent On

25/01/2024

Sent On

18/01/2024

Sent On

11/01/2024

Sent On

04/01/2024

Sent On

21/12/2023

Sent On

07/12/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.