Newsletter Subject

Christians & the Vaccine

From

thesgnl.email

Email Address

newsletters@thesgnl.email

Sent On

Fri, Dec 24, 2021 01:09 AM

Email Preheader Text

What drives recurring U.S. cultural conflicts like the ?War on Christmas?? Dan Cassino on the lo

What drives recurring U.S. cultural conflicts like the “War on Christmas”? Dan Cassino on the logic of identity politics in everyday life. Called Apart Why are America’s white evangelicals so resistant to getting vaccinated against the coronavirus? Curtis Chang on the public-health challenges of political polarization and institutional distrust. As winter falls on the Northern hemisphere and Covid’s Omicron variant drives a new surge in morbidity and mortality globally, vaccination rates in the United States remain uncommonly low among white evangelical Protestants. With white evangelicals making up [14 percent]( of the U.S. population, [32 percent]( affirmed in recent polling that they hadn’t been vaccinated, and [nearly a quarter]( that they wouldn’t be. Among the secular, or even adherents of other religious faiths, there may be a temptation to draw straight lines between these numbers and evangelical beliefs. But as recently as 2017, [more than three-quarters]( of white evangelicals supported vaccine mandates in schools, for measles, mumps, and rubella. What’s happened here? Curtis Chang is the founder of the evangelical organization [Redeeming Babel]( a senior fellow at Fuller Theological Seminary, and on the consulting faculty of the Duke Divinity School. According to Chang, there’s nothing intrinsic to the evangelical mind that’s caused widespread vaccine skepticism: Evangelicals are prone by their faith to question secular authority, not to reject it irrationally. What’s formed the correlation between anti-vaccine convictions and white evangelicals, Chang says, are a set of factors that have combined to break down their trust in U.S. pro-vaccine advocates and secular public-health authorities. The key to engaging white evangelicals on the pandemic effectively, as Chang sees it, is understanding that breakdown and how to create networks of trust capable of overcoming it. ——— Eve Olivette: How do you understand the factors driving such a high rate of aversion to the vaccine among white evangelicals in America? Curtis Chang: There are two main factors driving that rate—and they’re factors that are important for understanding vaccine skepticism among many Americans, whether they’re evangelical or not. One is polarization, unsurprisingly, and the second is a distrust of institutions. More than religion, or even religion versus science, this is what’s going on. On polarization, we’ve gotten into this situation in the U.S. where almost anything can become what I would call elements of the uniform for the two teams, and it can have nothing to do with a person’s core beliefs. The car that you drive, what you read, the TV shows you watch—they’ve now all essentially become, for complex reasons, markers of left and right, red and blue. For unfortunate reasons, the vaccine was enlisted into the [culture war]( American life is now locked into, such that to be on one side of it this war to be on one side of the vaccine—which, when you step back, is nonsensical. It’s absurd that a public-health measure like this, which benefits everyone, would somehow get recruited into polarized political conflict. But here we are, now in 2022, when everything is sucked into that dynamic, including the vaccine. On the distrust of institutions, this is where it’s important to realize that any of us who’s taken the vaccine has done so to the extent that we trust the institutions behind it. With a very small exception of high-end scientists, none of us can tell you exactly, Here’s the full range of studies that show the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. Here’s the chemical composition of the vaccine. Almost all of us are taking the vaccine because we trust the FDA, the CDC, Big Pharma, local public-health authorities—or we’re not taking the vaccine, because we distrust those institutions. And this is where understanding the white evangelical resistance to the vaccine in America means understanding the history of, and the reasons for, this pattern of distrust, especially in secular institutions. More from Curtis Chang at The Signal: “Evangelicalism has a special sense of critical thinking built into it. But what’s happened is that this has been weaponized by forces external to the evangelical faith, which have effectively hijacked this built-in religious disposition—forces like politicians, media sources, or anti-vax advocates, or others who’ve figured out how to get our votes or our clicks or our purchase dollars for medical products or whatever else they might want.” “There’s a set of false ideas that shares a lot in common with what generally circulates in the conservative information ecosystem. So you’ll see ideas about, for example, Ivermectin being the real treatment or vaccines being a government plot to control you. There’s a lot of overlap. But then there can be a religious veneer over this in the evangelical community that gives it a special potency.” “White evangelicals don’t want to hear about the vaccine from political leaders—even the political leaders of their tribe. They want to hear about it from doctors they trust, people they trust, their own community. Even though the issue has become so politicized, there’s something white evangelicals recognize in saying, I don’t want this to be a political issue. They’re looking for information that they can feel isn’t being tainted by political dynamics.” ——— ——— Happy Holidays [The Signal]( is a digital publication exploring key questions in democratic life and the human world, sustained entirely by readers like you. During the month of December, when you support The Signal with a new annual subscription, you’ll get full access to all articles—along with a second subscription, free of charge, to send to anyone you’d like. Simply select a Yearly subscription via the link below and follow the steps; at your convenience, send the name and email address for the recipient of your gift subscription to [mail@thesgnl.com](mailto:mail@thesgnl.com?utm_campaign=The%20Signal&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Revue%20newsletter); and they’ll get The Signal, with full access for a year, starting on January 4, 2022. Want to download a digital card to send along with news of your gift? [Here you go.]( © 2021 The Signal The Signal | 717 N St. NW, Ste. One, Washington, DC 20011 [Unsubscribe {EMAIL}]( [Constant Contact Data Notice]( Sent by newsletters@thesgnl.email

Marketing emails from thesgnl.email

View More
Sent On

25/01/2024

Sent On

18/01/2024

Sent On

11/01/2024

Sent On

04/01/2024

Sent On

21/12/2023

Sent On

07/12/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.