Newsletter Subject

Ford stole his patent. He fought them for 30 years — and won.

From

thehustle.co

Email Address

news@thehustle.co

Sent On

Sun, Nov 28, 2021 12:22 PM

Email Preheader Text

Issue #186 Sunday, November 28, 2021 The epic, decades-long battle between Ford and a small-time inv

[The Hustle]( Issue #186 [The Hustle, Sunday, November 28, 2021]( Sunday, November 28, 2021 The epic, decades-long battle between Ford and a small-time inventor 50 years ago, Ford stole a patented design for a new type of windshield wiper. But they picked the wrong inventor to screw with. BY [Zachary Crockett]( On a rainy day in 1962, Robert Kearns had one of those meandering thoughts that separate great inventors from mere mortals: What if a windshield wiper paused between each wipe, like a blinking eye? He constructed prototypes in his basement, filed a patent, and began to dream up a plan: He’d set up a pretty little factory in Detroit, become a major supplier of windshield wipers, and go down in history as one of the automobile industry’s great innovators. Then, Ford stole his idea. For nearly 30 years, Kearns waged an impossible legal battle against one of America’s most powerful companies. In the end, he won millions of dollars — but it cost him his sanity, his marriage, and the remaining years of his life. Kearns’ story is remembered as one of history’s great David vs. Goliath lawsuits. But it’s also a reminder of the shortcomings of the US patent system for independent inventors. An inventor is born Born in 1927, Kearns spent his youth in Detroit, Michigan, ground zero for the flourishing American automobile industry. As a kid, he toured Ford Motor Company’s [River Rouge Complex]( (then the largest integrated factory in the world) and marveled at the auto giant’s innovations. “The automotive — that’s all there was,” he later [told]( the New Yorker’s John Seabrook. “If you were an inventor, and you really wanted to reach people, you invented for the automotive.” [Kearns family picture] Robert Kearns (second from left) with his family (via Facebook’s public figure page) Determined to make his mark in this industry, Kearns earned a master’s degree in mechanical engineering and began working toward his Ph.D. He toyed around with various non-automotive inventions — a grease-dispensing hair comb, a voice amplifier, a weather balloon, a navigation system — but nothing stuck. Then, in 1962, the 35-year-old had a stroke of genius. A windshield wiper that mimics the human eye A decade earlier, on his wedding night, Kearns had popped open a bottle of champagne in his face and permanently blinded his left eye. His impaired vision caused many hardships, one of which was operating windshield wipers in the rain. In the early 1960s, wipers only had two settings (one for light rain and one for heavy rain) and were controlled by a [vacuum-powered system]( that ran continuously and didn’t allow for any variance in frequency. For Kearns, this didn’t suffice — and driving in the rain one day, he figured that a windshield wiper ought to function as a human eye, allowing the driver to control the pauses between, and speed of, the swipes. At the time, the auto industry made the bulk of its profits by selling add-ons and upgrades; something like a technologically-advanced windshield wiper meant big bucks. [Kearns' prototype] Kearns, years later, holding a prototype of his device (via The Washington Post/Getty Images) Kearns holed himself up in a corner of his basement with a pile of off-the-shelf electronics — transistors, capacitors, and variable resistors — and built his first [intermittent wiper]( prototype. He housed the device in a red box marked “DO NOT OPEN” and installed it in his Ford Galaxie. And in early 1963, he drove to the Ford factory to make his sales pitch. A fateful meeting with Ford Through a mutual connection, Kearns was able to set up a 45-minute meeting with Ford’s engineering team. His plan was simple: He’d blow them away with his intermittent wiper, sign a deal to license his technology, open a wiper factory of his own, and become the automobile industry’s go-to supplier. On the big day, Kearns was greeted by 10 engineers in the parking lot, who peppered him with questions about his invention. They expressed interest but told him the wipers had to run for 3m cycles to meet their standards. So, Kearns bought an aquarium, filled it with a mixture of oil and sawdust, installed a pair of his wipers inside, and let them run for 6 months straight. Upon passing the test, Kearns filed the [first patent]( for his intermittent wipers and returned to Ford. The inventor made a series of presentations to Ford’s engineers and executives — and this time they offered him a contract. But it came with one condition: Ford claimed that, because wipers were a “[safety item](,” all of Kearns’ engineering had to be disclosed before the contract was signed. [image of Kearns’ patent] An image from Kearns’ patent, filed in 1964 and approved in 1967 (via Google Patents) Sensing that he was close to fulfilling his dream, Kearns showed Ford exactly how his device worked and was welcomed aboard the team. But the celebration didn’t last long: 5 months later, he was dismissed. Ford, he was told, had come up with its own intermittent wiper totally on its own and no longer needed his services. When corporations steal In 1969, Ford debuted a fancy, first-of-its-kind intermittent windshield wiper on its line of Mercury cars. The wipers, which cost Ford $10 to make and sold for $37, were a hot commodity and were soon adopted by others in the auto industry: By the mid-1970s, Chrysler, General Motors, Saab, Honda, Volvo, Rolls-Royce, Mercedes and dozens of other big-name brands had a version of intermittent wipers on their cars. All mimicked the exact configuration of Kearns’ device. Kearns was so aghast when he found out about the infringement that he had a [mental breakdown]( and had to spend two weeks in a psychiatric ward. His hair, once red, turned snow white. [Ford intermittent wiper component] An early Ford intermittent wiper component (via eBay) Once recuperated, he hired a lawyer and wrote to Ford to inform the company of the infringement. The company’s response: They had not stolen Kearns’ idea and his [patent was invalid]( on the grounds that it wasn’t “sufficiently inventive.” In 1978, Kearns filed a patent infringement suit against Ford, seeking $350m — $50 for every intermittent-wiper-equipped car Ford sold. Ford then pulled the big corporation card: It stalled, hoping Kearns [would]( “lose heart or run out of money.” Kearns v. Goliath In the corporate world, there is a concept called “[efficient infringement](.” Big companies like Ford have found that it’s cheaper to steal a patented product and face any legal repercussions later than is it to license it. Most small-time inventors simply can’t afford to spend millions of dollars dragging a case through district courts. “Multinational companies know that screwing over suppliers is easy money,” says Mike Collins, an author who has studied manufacturing for 30 years. “You see it time and time again.” But as Ford would soon find out, Kearns wasn’t going to give up. The sexagenarian inventor hired (and fired) 5 different legal firms, and eventually decided to defend himself. He slept on the floor of his office, surrounded by boxes of evidence. He recruited his children to pore over documents. And he became so unilaterally obsessed with the case that his wife filed for divorce. [Kearns' court evidence] Kearns presenting evidence in court (via Dennis-Kearns.com) As Kearns waged this slow, agonizing war, his case became less about financial compensation and more about calling out big corporations for stealing intellectual property from inventors. At one point, he turned down a $30m settlement offer that would’ve cleared Ford from any wrongdoing. “This case isn’t about money,” he told the [Detroit Free Press](. “If I walk out of there with nothing more than a check then I’m nothing more than an employee of Ford.” In January of 1990 — 12 years after the filing — the case finally went to trial. And when it did, Kearns vanished. “I had to go,” he later told [People](. “If I had stayed, it would have legitimized what was happening.” He was deep in the Maryland woods, cooking knockwurst over a portable stove when a verdict was finally reached. Despite selling 20.6m cars (worth $575m in profit) equipped with intermittent wipers, Ford was to pay Kearns a settlement of [$10.2m](. Kearns was not pleased. “My intent was to have a small shop in Detroit, have nice shrubbery around the plant, hire people — that’s been my dream all my life,” he [said](. “When they offer you a settlement, they’re really sending you to a park bench.” The aftermath Though Robert Kearns was a newly-minted millionaire, he continued to live an ascetic life, sleeping on the floor of an unfurnished apartment stocked with documents, notes, and witness statements. The following year, he was back in court filing a similar patent infringement suit against Chrysler. [news headlines Kearns' victory] Headlines harped on Kearns’ victory (via assorted newspapers, 1980s-1990) Once again, he represented himself — a lone inventor up against the giant auto industry — and this time, he was awarded [$18.7m](. Kearns called the sum a “booby prize” (a prize typically given to a last-place finisher as a joke) and left the money uncollected for years in protest. He filed suit against 18 other automakers, but they were [dismissed]( for various reasons. (In one instance his son, Dennis, was found to have wrongly obtained documents by sparking a romantic affair with a paralegal at the firm representing Porsche). Eventually, Kearns bought himself an estate in Maryland [and]( “entered an uneasy retirement.” But even in his waning years, he still couldn’t let the patent cases go. By the time he died in 2005, the intermittent windshield wiper was an industry standard, built into millions of automobiles around the world. Today, he is regarded by many inventors as a personal hero for waging a war against the corporate world’s “steal now, pay later” ethos — even though he fell short of his ultimate dream. “Kearns gained some vindication in the form of $30m in settlements from Ford and Chrysler,” read his Washington Post [obituary](. “But he never got what he had sought from the beginning:” control over his own [invention](. Note: For more on Kearns, check out John Seabrook’s excellent [1993 New Yorker article]( on the inventor’s saga, and the 2005 feature film, [Flash of Genius](. Share & discuss this story on: [FACEBOOK]( [OUR WEBSITE]( [TWITTER]( [POCKET]( How did you like today’s story? Today's email was brought to you by Zachary Crockett and Brad Wolverton. [PODCAST]( [JOBS]( [CONTACT US](mailto:news@thehustle.co) [Facebook]( [Youtube]( [Instagram]( [Trends]( 25 FIRST ST. 2ND FLOOR, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02141, UNITED STATES • 888.482.7768 Never want to hear from us again? Break our hearts and [unsubscribe](list=thehustle). [The Hustle](

EDM Keywords (216)

youth years wrote wrongdoing would world wipers war walk waging vindication version verdict variance us turned trial told time team swipes suppliers supplier sum suffice stroke story still steal stayed standards speed sparking sought sold slept simple shortcomings settlements settlement set services series see screwing screw sanity said saga run returned response represented reminder remembered regarded recuperated recruited rain questions pulled prototype protest profits presentations pore pleased plan pile picked ph peppered pauses patent paralegal pair others open one oil offered offer nothing money mixture mimics mimicked millions meet master maryland marveled marriage mark make live line life license let legitimized left lawyer kid kearns joke january inventors inventor invention invented invalid intent installed innovations infringement inform image idea hustle housed history hired hearts hear happening hair grounds greeted going go give genius function fulfilling frequency found fought form ford floor filing figured facebook face executives evidence even estate entered engineers end employee email drove driving driver dream dozens dollars documents dismissed disclosed died device detroit degree defend deep deal cost corner controlled control contract continued company come close children check cheaper champagne celebration case cars came calling bulk built brought break boxes bottle blow began become became basement back away automotive automakers author approved america also allow aghast afford able 37 30m 2005 1964 1962 18

Marketing emails from thehustle.co

View More
Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

23/06/2023

Sent On

22/06/2023

Sent On

21/06/2023

Sent On

20/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.