Newsletter Subject

The bathroom stall of social

From

thehustle.co

Email Address

news@thehustle.co

Sent On

Mon, Dec 12, 2016 05:12 PM

Email Preheader Text

Yik Yak is down from 50 employees to 20 and they still don?t have a business model. are much less

Yik Yak is down from 50 employees to 20 and they still don’t have a business model. [The Hustle] Mon, Dec 12 The rise and demise of Yik Yak Last week, the anonymous chat platform Yik Yak announced that it will lay off [60% of its employees] as it attempts to revive its struggling user base. How did the app voted “most likely to succeed” by investors like Sequoia become social media’s latest burnout? Well, there are a few theories: First, the decline of the “field of dreams” If you build a large enough user base, the belief is that someone will come and buy it -- especially if it’s cheaper than doing it themselves. However, for companies without a clear path to monetization, [user acquisition deals] (like Google buying YouTube for $1.65B) are much less common today than they were 10 years ago. Doesn’t look like anyone told that to Yik Yak’s investors, who have yet to see returns on their $73.5M investment. Oops... Second, the challenge of complete anonymity Turns out the thing that drew users to Yik Yak in the first place also makes it [difficult to create a loyal community] of users. Think about it: Even anonymous platforms like Reddit have power users with recognizable handles and huge fan bases. These return readers can then be monetized through sponsored posts or native advertising. How the heck do you make any money off unidentifiable accounts? There’s not a ton of return on anonymous posts about how awesome Chipotle burritos are. It’s basically the equivalent writing your ad on a bathroom stall. (Wait we just gave ourselves an idea…) And then there’s the icing on the cake… Yik Yak’s public battle with cyber-bullying has plagued the platform since it’s inception. Racial slurs and physical threats have resulted in not only PR nightmares, but a petition with over 83,000 signatures to shut it down for good. All of this means that the Yak, which was once one of the top 10 most downloaded apps, now has less [than 100k downloads] per month. New year, new Yak? Not so much. The company is trying so hard to reinvent itself that it feels like they don’t even know who they are anymore. Back in March, they started encouraging usernames. Then in September, they mandated them. But once November arrived, they pulled a big ole’ 180 back to anonymous posting. Now that’s the kind of identity crisis a college kid can relate to. [It’s not a phase, mom] Where the heck are my AirPods, Apple? Three months after debuting AirPods and sending the entire internet into a frenzy about our wireless future, Apple still hasn’t made them available. And with the holiday season just around the corner, the timing couldn’t be worse. What’s the hold up? It’s all speculation, but according to one [Wall Street Journal source] (paywall), the trouble “appears to stem from Apple’s effort to chart a new path for wireless headphones.” See, normally only one wireless earpiece receives a signal via Bluetooth, which it then transmits to the other earpiece. But with AirPods, each earpiece receives an independent signal from the device. Therefore, Apple must ensure that the audio for each one is in sync… and it looks like this might causing the delay. Not everyone’s buying that, though John Gruber, the guy behind [Daring Fireball], doesn’t think Apple is having any technology-related issues. In fact, he says his prototype AirPods have “never once been out of sync” and that “if Apple could mass produce AirPods that worked exactly like my review unit pair does, it would be great.” (It’s important to note that Gruber is an Apple enthusiast, and also that analysts believe Apple ran into connection issues [after sending out prototypes] to critics, like Gruber, for review.) What’s he blame for the delay then? Apparently, word has spread from the AirPods engineering team that these futuristic, Her-inspired earbuds are “more difficult to manufacture at scale than expected.” And, considering this is such a rare misstep for the tech giant, and that the [last time they postponed] a product was due to manufacturing issues, this explanation is much more believable than the most valuable tech company in the world marketing a breakthrough technology that literally doesn’t work… Then again, Samsung couldn’t make a phone that didn’t blow up, so who knows these days. [Apple ruined Christmas] High-five for Michigan It looks like the mitten state has officially given autonomous vehicles the “thumbs up” (nailed it). On Friday, Michigan Governor Rick Snyder [passed the first bills] to approve the operation of self-driving cars on public roads. This is a huge step for companies like Uber and Google, but the new laws come with a small catch for tech companies. “Gotta hold hands when you cross the street” Specifically with traditional automakers. The [bills specify] that only “motor vehicle manufacturers” can operate a network of autonomous cars, throwing a wrench in the works of companies that make self-driving tech, but not the cars themselves (Apple, Uber, Google). It also means that, until they can do their manufacturing in-house, they’ll have to work directly with someone who does (Ford, GM, Dodge). Both Apple and Google have sent [strongly worded letters] to their local representatives (The Department of Transportation) expressing concern that this will limit innovation in the space. We certainly see their point, but we can’t help but wonder… Does this mean a comeback for the Motor City? It looks like there’s light at the end of the tunnel. This is a huge move to revitalize Michigan’s struggling economy, particularly for automakers in Detroit. Plus, it looks like old-school manufacturers are already investing in new-school tech. Companies like Ford have launched their own [startup incubators] dedicated to “mobility innovation” and improving road congestion. Our road rage thanks them. [Are you blind??] Crazy stat of the day According to new research, only [51% of 30-year-olds] earn more than their parents did at the same age. Just for reference, that number was 92% back in 1970. What the heck happened? While no specific reasons were provided, the researchers blame a slowdown in economic growth and the widening income gap in America. “Wages have stagnated in the middle class,” [one said]. “When you’re in that situation, it becomes very hard for children to do better than their parents.” So much for the American Dream… This research was conducted by Stanford, Harvard, and UC Berkeley as a way of measuring the strength of the American Dream, and the conclusion was that it’s [definitely fading]. Can’t wait to hear how millennials get blamed for this one. [Trophy generation!] monday morning review Made possible, by viewers like you As usual, we’ve been walkin’ the beat and gettin’ to know the streets by talking to readers like you, and it’s about time we shared some new feedback. Here goes: “Love this new comment section, taking email to Facebook to keep the conversation going. Well done. Hope it catches on in the community!” - Steffan We hope so, too. Since launching our comments section we’ve gotten some great insight from opinionated readers and we’re stoked to keep the conversation going. Click on the links under each story to join the fun. “How do you guys have the stamina to crank out awesome news like this each day??!!” - Eric It’s in our blood, man. Just kidding, it’s Soylent. Lots and lots of Soylent. “F*ck you b*tches i ain’t a lil jerk and ain’t subscribing to sh***t h0 - Anonymous Someone started watching HBO way too young… Also just FYI, the “Look what you did, you little jerk” subject line from our welcome email iis from Home Alone. Really, we’re nothing without you guys. So we take your feedback (mostly) super seriously. Reply with your two cents, or just say hi. We’re always listening. - Lindsey, VP of Reader Surveillance [SUBSCRIBE] [JOBS] [ADVERTISE] [AMBASSADORS] [EVENTS] [Kendall "beep beep" Baker] WRITER Lindsey Quinn PRIVATE EYE John Havel EDITOR Heidi Ductible INSURANCE AGENT You opted in by [signing up], entering a [giveaway], or through [divine intervention]. [1381 9TH AVENUE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94122, UNITED STATES] • [415.506.7210] Never wanna hear from us again? Break our hearts and [unsubscribe].

Marketing emails from thehustle.co

View More
Sent On

26/06/2023

Sent On

25/06/2023

Sent On

23/06/2023

Sent On

22/06/2023

Sent On

21/06/2023

Sent On

20/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.