The Supreme Courtâs view that they are in contempt did not faze the Centre and Gujarat, which brought the official files concerning the remission granted to 11 life convicts in the Bilkis Bano gang rape case to the courtroom on Tuesday, only to claim privilege over the contents. Appearing before a Bench of Justices K.M. Joseph and B.V. Nagarathna, Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju said he had âinstructionsâ that the Centre and the State were âconsideringâ a review petition against a March 27 order of the top court to be âready with the relevant files regarding the grant of remissionâ. The court explained it was important for it to examine the records to see whether the State government had independently applied its mind before granting remission to 11 men sentenced to life imprisonment for the gang rape of Bilkis Bano and the âmass murderâ of her family members during the 2002 riots. âToday it is this lady, tomorrow it can be me or you... What were the standards you applied for the remission?â Justice Joseph told Mr. Raju. Mr. Raju said the State had indeed applied its mind but was claiming privilege (exemption from disclosing information). âIf you cannot show reasons [for the remission], we will draw our own conclusions about your reasons... We will say your reasons do not hold water... You are in contempt... What is the reason for not showing them to the court?â Justice Joseph asked. Justice Nagarathna reasoned that the Centre and Gujarat would anyway have to show the documents to make a case for review. Mr. Raju said he had the files âreadyâ with him, but the Centre and Gujarat âwishedâ to file a review first. The law officer later went on to change tune, saying he had not seen the files himself. At the end of the hearing, when asked by the court when he would file the review petition, Mr. Raju said rather cryptically, âIf I am there, we will file it on Monday. Otherwise, I am not thereâ. The court has scheduled the next hearing on May 2 for final disposal. Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Head over to our newsletter subscription page to sign up for Editorâs Pick and more. Click here. The Hinduâs Editorials Mission Rajasthan: on the Congressâs internal political troubles Tragic unpreparedness: on the Maharashtra heatwave incident The Hinduâs Daily News Quiz Which country, for the first time, passed a law providing for marriage equality between same-sex couples, in 2000? The Netherlands Spain Canada The U.S.A To know the answer and to take the quiz, click here. [logo] Editor's Pick 19 April 2023 [The Hindu logo] In the Editor's Pick newsletter, The Hindu explains why a story was important enough to be carried on the front page of today's edition of our newspaper. [Arrow]( [Open in browser]( [Mail icon]( [More newsletters]( SC questions remission in Bilkis Bano case The Supreme Courtâs view that they are in contempt did not faze the Centre and Gujarat, which brought the official files concerning the [remission granted to 11 life convicts in the Bilkis Bano gang rape case]( to the courtroom on Tuesday, [only to claim privilege over the contents.]( Appearing before a Bench of Justices K.M. Joseph and B.V. Nagarathna, Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju said he had âinstructionsâ that the Centre and the State were[âconsideringâ a review petition against a March 27 order of the top court]( to be âready with the relevant files regarding the grant of remissionâ. The court explained it was important for it to examine the records to see whether the State government had independently applied its mind before granting remission to 11 men sentenced to life imprisonment for the [gang rape of Bilkis Bano and the âmass murderâ of her family members during the 2002 riots.]( âToday it is this lady, tomorrow it can be me or you... What were the standards you applied for the remission?â Justice Joseph told Mr. Raju. Mr. Raju said the State had indeed applied its mind but was claiming privilege (exemption from disclosing information). âIf you cannot show reasons [for the remission], we will draw our own conclusions about your reasons... We will say your reasons do not hold water ... You are in contempt... What is the reason for not showing them to the court?â Justice Joseph asked. Justice Nagarathna reasoned that the Centre and Gujarat would anyway have to show the documents to make a case for review. Mr. Raju said he had the files âreadyâ with him, but the Centre and Gujarat âwishedâ to file a review first. The law officer later went on to change tune, saying he had not seen the files himself. [At the end of the hearing]( when asked by the court when he would file the review petition, Mr. Raju said rather cryptically, âIf I am there, we will file it on Monday. Otherwise, I am not thereâ. The court has scheduled the next hearing on May 2 for final disposal. Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Head over to our newsletter subscription page to sign up for Editorâs Pick and more. [Click here.]( The Hinduâs Editorials [Arrow][Mission Rajasthan: on the Congressâs internal political troubles](
[Arrow][Tragic unpreparedness: on the Maharashtra heatwave incident]( The Hinduâs Daily News Quiz Which country, for the first time, passed a law providing for marriage equality between same-sex couples, in 2000? - The Netherlands
- Spain
- Canada
- The U.S.A To know the answer and to take the quiz, [click here.]( [Sign up for free]( Today's Best Reads [[No absolute concept of a man or a woman, says SC in same-sex marriage case] No absolute concept of a man or a woman, says SC in same-sex marriage case](
[[India, Russia agree to deepen trade and economic relations] India, Russia agree to deepen trade and economic relations]( [[WHO strongly condemns reported attacks on health personnel, health facilities, and ambulances in Sudan] WHO strongly condemns reported attacks on health personnel, health facilities, and ambulances in Sudan](
[[181 persons from Karnataka stuck in Sudan amid shortage of food, water] 181 persons from Karnataka stuck in Sudan amid shortage of food, water]( Copyright @ 2023, THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD. If you are facing any trouble in viewing this newsletter, please [try here](
If you do not wish to receive such emails [go here](