Editor's Pick: At COP-27, India and three others oppose ‘carbon border tax’

India, along with Brazil, South Africa, and China, issued a joint statement on Wednesday saying that carbon border tax must be avoided as it can result in market distortion and aggravate the trust deficit among parties. The statement was issued during the ongoing Conference of Parties (COP) in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt. European Union’s (EU) Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism is a policy to tax products such as cement and steel, that are extremely carbon intensive, with effect from 2026. The carbon border tax is basically a proposed surcharge that companies have to pay to sell their products in the EU as compensation for the pollution that was emitted during the manufacturing process, in a bid to incentivise use of cleaner energy. Brazil, India, South Africa and China – members of the BASIC group – are significantly dependent on coal and want to exercise their right to use fossil fuel in the interim during their countries’ eventual transformation to clean energy sources. The joint statement delivered by BASIC reiterates doubts about developed countries showing leadership or responding with a matching progression of effort. The statement pointed that developed countries had “backtracked on finance and mitigation commitments and pledges” and there was a “significant increase” in the consumption and production of fossil fuels in the past year by developed countries even as they continue to press developing countries to move away from the same resources. “Such double standards are incompatible with climate equity and justice.” The opposition to the policy that shifts the burden of cleaning the environment towards developing countries also comes at a time when developed countries are facing pressure to pay for the environmental damage their past industrial actions have caused. Loss and damage compensation – the cost paid by rich, developed and industrialised countries that have been responsible for a major chunk of emissions in the environment to poorer, developing countries that are bearing the brunt of climate change without sufficient financial means to avert the damage caused – has been a significant demand put forth during the Climate Summit this year. Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Head over to our newsletter subscription page to sign up for Editor‘s Pick and more. Click here. The Hindu’s Editorials Welcome pragmatism: On India’s G20 presidency Halting the slide: On Biden-Xi meeting The Hindu’s Daily Epaper Quiz As the global population reached 8 billion, how many million of the last billion people born in the world did India contribute to? 117 million 103 million 73 million 111 million To know the answer and to play the full quiz, click here. [logo] Editor's Pick 17 NOVEMBER 2022 [The Hindu logo] In the Editor's Pick newsletter, The Hindu explains why a story was important enough to be carried on the front page of today's edition of our newspaper. [Arrow]( [Open in browser]( [Mail icon]( [More newsletters]( At COP-27, India and three others oppose ‘carbon border tax’ India, along with Brazil, South Africa, and China, issued a joint statement on Wednesday saying that [carbon border tax]( must be avoided as it can result in market distortion and aggravate the trust deficit among parties. The statement was issued during the ongoing Conference of Parties (COP) in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt.  European Union’s (EU) Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism is a policy to tax products such as cement and steel, that are extremely carbon intensive, with effect from 2026. The carbon border tax is basically a proposed surcharge that companies have to pay to sell their products in the EU as compensation for the pollution that was emitted during the manufacturing process, in a bid to incentivise use of cleaner energy. Brazil, India, South Africa and China – members of the BASIC group – are significantly dependent on coal and want to exercise their right to use fossil fuel in the interim during their countries’ eventual transformation to clean energy sources.  The joint statement delivered by BASIC reiterates doubts about developed countries showing leadership or responding with a matching progression of effort. The statement pointed that developed countries had “backtracked on finance and mitigation commitments and pledges” and there was a “significant increase” in the consumption and production of fossil fuels in the past year by developed countries even as they continue to press developing countries to move away from the same resources. “Such double standards are incompatible with climate equity and justice.” The opposition to the policy that shifts the burden of cleaning the environment towards developing countries also comes at a time when developed countries are facing pressure to pay for the environmental damage their past industrial actions have caused. Loss and damage compensation – the cost paid by rich, developed and industrialised countries that have been responsible for a major chunk of emissions in the environment to poorer, developing countries that are bearing the brunt of climate change without sufficient financial means to avert the damage caused – has been a significant demand put forth during the Climate Summit this year. Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Head over to our newsletter subscription page to sign up for Editor‘s Pick and more. [Click here.]( The Hindu’s Editorials [Arrow][Welcome pragmatism: On India’s G20 presidency]( [Arrow][Halting the slide: On Biden-Xi meeting]( The Hindu’s Daily Epaper Quiz As the global population reached 8 billion, how many million of the last billion people born in the world did India contribute to? - 117 million - 103 million - 73 million - 111 million To know the answer and to play the full quiz, [click here.]( Today’s Best Reads [[Rahul Gandhi’s yatra, Kharge’s presidency and the future of the Congress   ] Rahul Gandhi’s yatra, Kharge’s presidency and the future of the Congress  Â]( [[Watch | Business Matters: What is different about this year’s climate conference?] Watch | Business Matters: What is different about this year’s climate conference?]( [[Who should pay for climate damage?] Who should pay for climate damage?]( [[The significance of Xi Jinping meeting Joe Biden | In Focus podcast] The significance of Xi Jinping meeting Joe Biden | In Focus podcast]( Copyright @ 2022, THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD. If you are facing any trouble in viewing this newsletter, please [try here]( If you do not wish to receive such emails [go here](