Newsletter Subject

Editor's Pick: A political storm over Pegasus

From

thehindu.com

Email Address

news@newsalertth.thehindu.com

Sent On

Sun, Jan 30, 2022 07:51 AM

Email Preheader Text

An investigation by The New York Times, which said that the Indian government had purchased the Isra

An investigation by The New York Times, which said that the Indian government had purchased the Israeli NSO Group's Pegasus software in July 2017 to carry out targeted surveillance on citizens, led to a political storm on Saturday. The story on Pegasus was first published last year, when an international group of publications reported that a spyware known as Pegasus was being used to snoop on politicians, journalists, activists and those holding constitutional positions, primarily in 10 countries including India. The government then published a blanket denial of these claims and responded that the reports had "no factual basis" and were intended to "malign Indian democracy and its institutions". The Supreme Court later intervened, instituting an independent probe into the possible use of Pegasus. The court said the issue was of "Orwellian concern". The panel's report is awaited. The NYT in its recent report claimed that the meetings between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last year were part of a larger backroom deal. Pegasus, it claimed, was one of the central pieces of an agreement for the sale of a package of sophisticated weapons and intelligence gear worth about $2 billion between India and Israel. Apart from India, Pegasus was sold to countries such as UAE, Hungary, Poland and Mexico, the report said. It further claimed that the sale of Pegasus strengthened the ties of all these countries with the Netanyahu government and led them to shift their position on Palestine. India's Ambassador to the UN, Syed Akbaruddin, denied the claim that India voted in support of Israel at the UN because of this. While the government did not respond to the allegations this time, the Opposition seized the opportunity to attack the government. The Congress said that the "targeting" of certain individuals was an "act of treason", the CPI(M) called it a "serious subversion of democracy" and the Trinamool Congress called it "proof of state-sponsored surveillance" that "blatantly abused the rights of Indians". As these allegations refuse to die down and the use of Pegasus involves a possible violation of citizens' rights, as this The Hindu editorial pointed out, this is the top story of the day. Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Head over to our newsletter subscription page to sign up for Editor's Pick and more. Click hereThe Hindu Explainers Explained | How is U.S. tackling discrimination on campuses? Explained | Can a recipient decline a Padma award? Try out The Hindu's daily news quiz In 2020, Google acquired a 7.73% stake in which Indian telecom company? 1. Vodafone-Idea 2. BSNL 3. Jio Platforms 4. Bharti Airtel To find out the answer and play the full quiz, click here. [logo] Editor's Pick 30 JANUARY 2022 [The Hindu logo] In the Editor's Pick newsletter, The Hindu explains why a story was important enough to be carried on the front page of today's edition of our newspaper. [Arrow]( [Open in browser]( [Mail icon]( [More newsletters]( A political storm over Pegasus [A political storm over Pegasus] An investigation by The New York Times, which said that the Indian government had purchased the [Israeli NSO Group's Pegasus software]( in July 2017 to carry out targeted surveillance on citizens, led to a political storm on Saturday. The story on Pegasus was first published last year, when an international group of publications reported that a spyware known as Pegasus was being used to snoop on politicians, journalists, activists and those holding constitutional positions, primarily in 10 countries including India. The government then published a blanket denial of these claims and responded that the reports had "no factual basis" and were intended to "malign Indian democracy and its institutions". The Supreme Court later intervened, instituting an independent probe into the possible use of Pegasus. The court said the issue was of "Orwellian concern". The panel's report is awaited. The NYT in its recent report claimed that the meetings between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last year were part of a larger backroom deal. Pegasus, it claimed, was one of the central pieces of an agreement for the sale of a package of sophisticated weapons and intelligence gear worth about $2 billion between India and Israel. Apart from India, Pegasus was sold to countries such as UAE, Hungary, Poland and Mexico, the report said. It further claimed that the sale of Pegasus strengthened the ties of all these countries with the Netanyahu government and led them to shift their position on Palestine. India's Ambassador to the UN, Syed Akbaruddin, denied the claim that India voted in support of Israel at the UN because of this. While the government did not respond to the allegations this time, the Opposition seized the opportunity to attack the government. The Congress said that the "targeting" of certain individuals was an "act of treason", the CPI(M) called it a "serious subversion of democracy" and the Trinamool Congress called it "proof of state-sponsored surveillance" that "blatantly abused the rights of Indians". As these allegations refuse to die down and the use of Pegasus involves a possible violation of citizens' rights, as this [The Hindu editorial]( pointed out, this is the top story of the day. [underlineimg] Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Head over to our newsletter subscription page to sign up for Editor's Pick and more. [Click here]( The Hindu Explainers [Arrow][Explained | How is U.S. tackling discrimination on campuses?]( [Arrow][Explained | Can a recipient decline a Padma award?]( [underlineimg] Try out The Hindu's daily news quiz In 2020, Google acquired a 7.73% stake in which Indian telecom company? 1. Vodafone-Idea 2. BSNL 3. Jio Platforms 4. Bharti Airtel To find out the answer and play the full quiz, [click here](. [underlineimg] Today's Best Reads [[Faster spread of Omicron is not due to higher viral load] Faster spread of Omicron is not due to higher viral load]( [[Paul-Henri Damiba | The colonel who seized power] Paul-Henri Damiba | The colonel who seized power]( [[New study documents the songs of frog species] New study documents the songs of frog species]( [[Chakmas and Hajongs | The peoples without a state] Chakmas and Hajongs | The peoples without a state]( Copyright @ 2021, THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD. If you are facing any trouble in viewing this newsletter, please [try here]( If you do not wish to receive such emails [go here](

Marketing emails from thehindu.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.