Newsletter Subject

Editor's Pick: Centre to review criteria for EWS quota

From

thehindu.com

Email Address

news@newsalertth.thehindu.com

Sent On

Fri, Nov 26, 2021 06:49 AM

Email Preheader Text

The Union Government has informed the Supreme Court that it had taken a “considered decision?

The Union Government has informed the Supreme Court that it had taken a “considered decision” to revisit the “criteria” for determining Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) to provide them reservation. The Government, represented by Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta, said it would take four weeks for the exercise. The submission follows rounds of grilling from the court during past hearings to reveal the logic and study before zeroing in on the “exact figure” of ₹8 lakh as the annual income limit to identify the EWS. “The Union Government has taken a considered decision to revisit the criteria for determining the economically weaker sections in terms of the provisions of the Explanation to Article 15 of the Constitution inserted by the Constitution (103rdAmendment) Act, 2019,” a Bench led by D.Y. Chandrachud recorded in its order. The court was hearing a case filed by NEET aspirants challenging a July 29 notification announcing 27% quota to OBCs and 10% reservation to the EWS in the All India Quota (AIQ) category. The Government assured the court that the NEET counselling would be deferred for four weeks till a decision was taken on the EWS quota. The Bench has scheduled the case next on January 6. Mr. Mehta, appearing for the Government along with Additional Solicitor-General K.M. Natraj, said they have been instructed to submit that a committee would be set up to review the “criteria” to identify the EWS category. The EWS quota was meant for persons who earned less than ₹8 lakh annually and did not benefit from any other existing reservation. In a previous hearing, the apex court had expressed its annoyance at the Government for not filing an affidavit explaining how it reached the ₹8 lakh figure to identify the EWS category. “Tell us if you want to revisit the criteria or not. If you want us to discharge our duties, then we are ready to do so. We are formulating questions… you need to answer them,” Justice Chandrachud had said. “You cannot just pick ₹8 lakh from thin air and fix it as a criterion. There has to be some basis, some study. Tell us whether any demographic study or data was taken into account in fixing the limit. How do you arrive at this exact figure?” the court had asked the Government. In August, after the Supreme Court ruling that economic criterion alone cannot be used to classify a member of a Backward Class as belonging to a ‘creamy layer’, an editorial in The Hindu said, “With the current income ceiling being ₹8 lakh per annum for availing of both OBC and EWS quotas, there is a strange and questionable balance between the OBC and EWS segments in terms of eligibility, even though the size of the respective quotas vary.” In this backdrop, the Government’s decision to rethink the economic criteria to provide reservation to the economically backward sections makes it the top story of the day. The Hindu's Editorials Raiding party: On Mamata Banerjee’s national ambitions Measuring progress: On the lessons of National Family Health Survey-5 Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Head over to our newsletter subscription page to sign up for Editor's Pick and more. Click here Try out The Hindu's daily news quiz Which Indian State will grant its employees leave on New Year to visit their parents? 1. Assam 2. Gujarat 3. Maharashtra 4. Karnataka To find out the answer and play the full quiz, click here. [logo] Editor's Pick 26 NOVEMBER 2021 [The Hindu logo] In the Editor's Pick newsletter, The Hindu explains why a story was important enough to be carried on the front page of today's edition of our newspaper. [Arrow]( [Open in browser]( [Mail icon]( [More newsletters]( Centre to review criteria for EWS quota [Centre to review criteria for EWS quota] The Union Government has informed the Supreme Court that it had taken a “considered decision” to revisit the “criteria” for [determining Economically Weaker Sections (EWS)]( to provide them reservation. The Government, represented by Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta, said it would take four weeks for the exercise. The submission follows rounds of grilling from the court during past hearings to reveal the logic and study before zeroing in on the “exact figure” of [₹8 lakh as the annual income limit]( to identify the EWS. “The Union Government has taken a considered decision to revisit the criteria for determining the economically weaker sections in terms of the provisions of the Explanation to Article 15 of the Constitution inserted by the Constitution (103rdAmendment) Act, 2019,” a Bench led by D.Y. Chandrachud recorded in its order. The court was hearing [a case filed by NEET aspirants]( challenging a July 29 notification announcing 27% quota to OBCs and 10% reservation to the EWS in the All India Quota (AIQ) category. The Government assured the court that the NEET counselling would be deferred for four weeks till a decision was taken on the EWS quota. The Bench has scheduled the case next on January 6.  Mr. Mehta, appearing for the Government along with Additional Solicitor-General K.M. Natraj, said they have been instructed to submit that a committee would be set up to review the “criteria” to identify the EWS category. The EWS quota was meant for persons who earned less than ₹8 lakh annually and did not benefit from any other existing reservation. In a previous hearing, the apex court had expressed its annoyance at the Government for not filing an affidavit explaining how it reached the ₹8 lakh figure to identify the EWS category. “Tell us if you want to revisit the criteria or not. If you want us to discharge our duties, then we are ready to do so. We are formulating questions… you need to answer them,” Justice Chandrachud had said. “You cannot just pick ₹8 lakh from thin air and fix it as a criterion. There has to be some basis, some study. Tell us whether any demographic study or data was taken into account in fixing the limit. How do you arrive at this exact figure?” the court had asked the Government. In August, after the Supreme Court ruling that economic criterion alone cannot be used to classify a member of a Backward Class as belonging to a ‘creamy layer’, an editorial in The Hindu said, “With the current income ceiling being ₹8 lakh per annum for availing of both OBC and EWS quotas, there is a strange and questionable balance between the OBC and EWS segments in terms of eligibility, even though the size of the respective quotas vary.” In this backdrop, the Government’s decision to rethink the economic criteria to provide reservation to the economically backward sections makes it the top story of the day. [underlineimg] The Hindu's Editorials [Arrow][Raiding party: On Mamata Banerjee’s national ambitions]( [Arrow][Measuring progress: On the lessons of National Family Health Survey-5]( [underlineimg]  Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Head over to our newsletter subscription page to sign up for Editor's Pick and more. [Click here]( Try out The Hindu's daily news quiz Which Indian State will grant its employees leave on New Year to visit their parents? 1. Assam 2. Gujarat 3. Maharashtra 4. Karnataka To find out the answer and play the full quiz, [click here](. [underlineimg] Today's Best Reads [[Is the crypto asset boom sustainable?] Is the crypto asset boom sustainable?]( [[Bring in three-rate GST structure, says study by Finance Ministry-backed think-tank] Bring in three-rate GST structure, says study by Finance Ministry-backed think-tank]( [[Setting the tone at Glasgow, the job ahead in Delhi] Setting the tone at Glasgow, the job ahead in Delhi]( [[National Family Health Survey says women outnumber men] National Family Health Survey says women outnumber men]( Copyright @ 2021, THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD. If you are facing any trouble in viewing this newsletter, please [try here]( If you do not wish to receive such emails [go here](

Marketing emails from thehindu.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.