Newsletter Subject

Editor's Pick | Political parties unable to produce data about electoral bond donors

From

thehindu.com

Email Address

news@newsalertth.thehindu.com

Sent On

Mon, Mar 18, 2024 11:36 AM

Email Preheader Text

The larger recipients of funding from electoral bonds, including the Bhartiya Janata Party, Congress

The larger recipients of funding from electoral bonds, including the Bhartiya Janata Party, Congress and the Trinamool Congress have not shared details about their donors, in their submissions to the Election Commission of India (ECI) under the direction of the Supreme Court in May 2019 and November 2023. This came to light on Sunday when the Commission published the data previously submitted to it by political parties in sealed covers under the top court’s directions. In fact, only a handful of parties including the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and Janata Dal (Secular) have complied with the directive. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and Janata Dal (United) revealed donor names from the start of the scheme in 2018 till May 2019. The largest recipient of electoral bonds, the BJP, pointed to the rules of the scheme that precluded parties from having to maintain donor details. Thus, it did not maintain a record of these particulars. Other parties too put forth the same argument, stating these were essentially bearer bonds. The details will only be available with the authorised bond issuer, the State Bank of India (SBI), they said. Congress and Trinamool Congress in fact stated in their 2019 disclosures that they had specifically asked the SBI to provide them with details of the donors’ names. SBI published the data on electoral bonds in two sets on March 14. The first contained the name of the purchaser of the bond, and the denomination of the bond purchased. The second set contained the date of encashment, the denomination and the political party that encashed it. A total of 22,217 bonds were purchased between April 1, 2019, and February 15, 2024, with 22,030 bonds encashed by political parties. The Hindu’s Editorials On the ballot: On the general election to the 18th Lok Sabha Bonded favours: On the electoral bond scheme, sordid revelations The Hindu’s Daily News Quiz This parliamentary election will be the second longest polling exercise in India’s electoral history. Which was the first one 1975-77 1951-52 1952-53 1962-63 To know the answer and to play the full quiz, click here. [logo] Editor's Pick 18 March 2024 [The Hindu logo] In the Editor's Pick newsletter, The Hindu explains why a story was important enough to be carried on the front page of today's edition of our newspaper. [Arrow]Open in browser [Mail icon]More newsletters Political parties unable to produce data about electoral bond donors The larger recipients of funding from electoral bonds, including the Bhartiya Janata Party, Congress and the Trinamool Congress [have not shared details about their donors]( in their submissions to the Election Commission of India (ECI) under the direction of the Supreme Court in May 2019 and November 2023. This came to light on Sunday when the Commission published the data previously submitted to it by political parties in sealed covers under the top court’s directions. In fact, only a handful of parties including the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and Janata Dal (Secular) have complied with the directive. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and Janata Dal (United) revealed donor names from the start of the scheme in 2018 till May 2019. The largest recipient of electoral bonds, the BJP, pointed to the rules of the scheme that precluded parties from having to maintain donor details. Thus, it did not maintain a record of these particulars. Other parties too put forth the same argument, stating these were essentially bearer bonds. The details will only be available with the authorised bond issuer, the State Bank of India (SBI), they said. Congress and Trinamool Congress in fact stated in their 2019 disclosures that they had specifically asked the SBI to provide them with details of the donors’ names. SBI published the data on electoral bonds in two sets on March 14. The first contained the name of the purchaser of the bond, and the denomination of the bond purchased. The second set contained the date of encashment, the denomination and the political party that encashed it.  A total of 22,217 bonds were purchased between April 1, 2019, and February 15, 2024, with 22,030 bonds encashed by political parties. The Hindu’s Editorials [Arrow][On the ballot: On the general election to the 18th Lok SabhaÂ]( [Arrow][Bonded favours: On the electoral bond scheme, sordid revelations]( The Hindu’s Daily News Quiz This parliamentary election will be the second longest polling exercise in India’s electoral history. Which was the first one - 1975-77 - 1951-52 - 1952-53 - 1962-63 To know the answer and to play the full quiz, [click here](. [Sign up for free]( Today’s Best Reads [[How were the new Election Commissioners selected? | Explained] How were the new Election Commissioners selected? | Explained]( [[Supreme Court orders ‘complete disclosure’ on electoral bonds from SBI] Supreme Court orders ‘complete disclosure’ on electoral bonds from SBI]( [[Vladimir Putin | Reign of the patriarch] Vladimir Putin | Reign of the patriarch]( [[Scientists build a camera to ‘show’ how animals see moving things] Scientists build a camera to ‘show’ how animals see moving things]( Copyright© 2024, THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD. If you are facing any trouble in viewing this newsletter, please [try here]( Manage your newsletter subscription preferences [here]( If you do not wish to receive such emails [go here](

Marketing emails from thehindu.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.