Newsletter Subject

House to Vote on Bigger Child Tax Credit, Business Breaks

From

thefiscaltimes.com

Email Address

newsletter@thefiscaltimes.com

Sent On

Wed, Jan 31, 2024 11:56 PM

Email Preheader Text

Plus: When will the Fed cut rates? ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Plus: When will the Fed cut rates? ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ [The Fisc](   By Yuval Rosenberg and Michael Rainey Happy Wednesday! Here’s your fiscal update. Johnson faced complaints from both moderates and conservatives. (Sipa USA) House Set to Vote on Bipartisan Tax Bill to Expand Child Credit, Restore Business Breaks The House of Representatives is poised to vote tonight on a $78 billion bipartisan deal that would temporarily enhance the Child Tax Credit and restore a trio of corporate tax breaks. The measure is expected to pass with broad bipartisan backing, though the vote only comes after House Speaker Mike Johnson was able to reach a side deal to allay the concerns of blue state Republicans upset that the cap on state and local tax deductions was not raised in the legislation. “The Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act is important bipartisan legislation to revive conservative pro-growth tax reform,” Johnson [said]( in a statement Wednesday. “This bottom-up process is a good example of how Congress is supposed to make law.” The Child Tax Credit, now capped at $2,000, would be indexed to inflation for 2024 and 2025. The refundable portion of the credit would be raised from the current $1,600 to $1,800 for 2023, $1,900 for 2024 and $2,000 in 2025. Families would also be allowed to use their previous year’s earnings to set their eligibility for the credit. The deal also restores several business tax benefits that have ended or are set to expire. The plan is paid for, at least in the near term, by reining in the employee retention tax credit, which has been subject to widespread fraud. The [bill]( isn’t law yet, though. To get to Wednesday’s vote, Johnson had to maneuver around objections from both moderates and conservatives in his party. To assuage the moderates, he reportedly committed to bringing up separate legislation to boost or remove the $10,000 cap on state and local tax deductions imposed in 2017 to help pay for the Republican tax cuts. And to bypass conservatives who might otherwise block the bill over the child tax credit expansion, he’s bringing it up for a floor vote under a suspension of the House rules, meaning that it will require a two-thirds majority for passage — and that a large number of Democratic votes will be needed. Even if the bill clears the House tonight as expected, it could still face challenges in the Senate, where some members have raised concerns about specific provisions — or about the general idea of passing anything that could benefit President Joe Biden’s reelection chances. “I think passing a tax bill that makes the president look good mailing out checks before the election, means he could be reelected and then we won’t extend the 2017 tax cuts,” Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa told [Semafor]( even though House Republicans insist that Biden is specifically [prohibited]( from timing the refund checks to maximize his political benefit. Why it matters: Backers of the bill say it will help 16 million kids from low-income families while also strengthening businesses, promoting innovation and improving U.S. competitiveness with China. Politically, the deal includes victories for both parties and represents a rare bipartisan accomplishment for a Republican-led House that has struggled to legislate. While business groups support the legislation, some conservatives have decried the changes to the Child Tax Credit as an expansion of the welfare state that would disincentivize work, and some have claimed that undocumented immigrants would be able to get the credit — a claim that Republican House Ways and Means Chairman Jason Smith has said is “completely false.” Some progressives, meanwhile, have said that the Child Tax Credit should be expanded further and that the balance of benefits in the legislation is tilted too far toward businesses. “The tax deal fails on equity,” Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, said in a [statement]( this week. “At a time when a majority of American voters believe tax on big corporations should be increased, there is no reason we should be providing corporations a tax cut while only giving families pennies.” The bottom line: The House is set to do something that looked highly unlikely just weeks ago, and an overwhelming vote could pressure the Senate to follow suit. Fed Not Declaring Victory Yet in Battle Against Inflation The Federal Reserve announced Wednesday that it is maintaining its benchmark interest rate in a range between 5.25% and 5.5%, where it has stood since July as part of the central bank’s effort to reduce inflation. In a [statement]( the Federal Open Market Committee said the economy has been solid in recent months, with strong job growth and falling inflation. “The committee judges that the risks to achieving its employment and inflation goals are moving into better balance,” it said. The improvement, however, is not yet sufficient to warrant a reduction in interest rates. Fed Chair Jerome Powell told reporters that Fed officials need to see “more good data" to be confident that inflation is truly under control before they start cutting rates. “It’s not that the six-month data isn’t low enough, it is,” he said. “It’s just a question, can we take that with confidence we are moving steadily under 2%.” Powell pushed back against claims that the battle against inflation has already been won. “No, I don’t think we have achieved that,” he said in response to a question about whether the Fed had pulled off a “soft landing” — beating inflation without causing a recession. “We’re not declaring victory at all at this point, we think we have a ways to go,” he added. At the same time, Powell said Fed officials have “growing confidence” that they are moving closer to their goals, and that it is unlikely that the Fed will need to raise rates again. “Let's be honest,” he said, “this is a good economy.” What comes next: Although Powell poured cold water on the hope that the Fed would start cutting rates at its March meeting, he did say that it “will likely be appropriate to begin dialing back policy restraint at some point this year” – though, as always, any such move would depend on the data. Many on Wall Street had hoped to see rate cuts in March, but after the Fed announcement, investors shifted their focus to the following FOMC meeting, with the [CME FedWatch tool]( showing a 60.2% chance of a 25-basis-point cut in May. The expectation of a later date for the first rate cut in 2024 was not welcome news to those worried that monetary conditions are too tight given the reduction in inflation over the last year. “The current stance of policy is no longer warranted by the inflation backdrop,” Daleep Singh, chief global economist at PGIM Fixed Income, [told The Wall Street Journal](. “The prudent policy stance is to return to a neutral setting. There are potentially serious costs and little benefit to waiting. The longer they wait, the larger the risks will grow.” Comerica Bank’s chief economist Bill Adams said in a note that he expects the Fed to be extra cautious since the central bankers were “badly burned in late 2021 and 2022 when they thought high inflation would be transitory, then got caught by surprise when it was higher and more persistent than expected.” Adams added, per [CNBC]( that the “Fed will wait to pull the trigger on rate cuts until they see the whites of 2% inflation’s eyes.” Quote of the Day “Donald Trump’s plans for a universal 10% tariff on all imports and tariffs of up to 60% on imports from China specifically would subtract up to 1.5% from US GDP and trigger a rebound in inflation that could force the Fed to raise interest rates again.” — From a research note by Capital Economics, [cited]( Wednesday by The Washington Post’s Catherine Rampell. --------------------------------------------------------------- Send your feedback to yrosenberg@thefiscaltimes.com. And please encourage your friends to [sign up here]( for their own copy of this newsletter. --------------------------------------------------------------- Fiscal News Roundup - [Tax Bill Moves Forward, but Election-Year Politics Threaten Its Chances]( – New York Times - [House Set to Vote to Expand Child Tax Credit, Beef Up Corporate Tax Breaks]( – Washington Post - [House Expected to Vote on Bipartisan Tax Bill That Expands Child Tax Credit]( – CNN - [House GOP Clears Path for Tax Package With ‘SALT’ on the Side]( – Roll Call - [Tax Bill Infighting Shows Johnson’s Go-to Strategy on Tough Bills]( – Politico - [Supplemental Stuck for Now in Senate Starting Blocks]( – Roll Call - [Johnson Stands by Opposition to Senate Immigration Deal and Biden’s Border Policy]( – CNN - [Johnson Says Ukraine Aid and Border Policy Reform ‘Likely’ to Be Split]( – The Hill - [Lankford's Make-or-Break Moment on the Border]( – Politico - [White House Escalates Attacks on House Republicans for Border Deal Impasse]( – Politico - [With Aid Stalled, Ukraine Scrambles to Make Ends Meet]( – New York Times - [Fed Leaves Rates Unchanged and Points to Upcoming Cuts]( – Washington Post - [Biogen Abandons Its Controversial Alzheimer’s Drug Aduhelm]( – New York Times - [Novo Nordisk Profit Surges as It Boosts Supplies of Wegovy]( – Washington Post Views and Analysis - [GOP Says No Need for New Immigration Laws. That’s Not What It Used to Say]( – Aaron Blake, Washington Post - [Can Lankford Overcome the Right?]( – Leigh Ann Caldwell and Theodoric Meyer, Washington Post - [More Money for Parents? Both Parties Just Might Make It Happen.]( – Claire Cain Miller, Alicia Parlapiano and Margot Sanger-Katz, New York Times - [Doomed Border-Security Deal Was a Bad Bet for Kyrsten Sinema]( – Ed Kilgore, New York - [It’s Time for the Fed to Cut Interest Rates]( – Heather Long, Washington Post - [Inflation Might Be Down, but Jerome Powell Isn’t (Quite) Ready to Cut Interest Rates]( – Kevin T. Dugan, New York - [Jay Powell’s Victory Lap]( – Robert Kuttner, American Prospect - [We Can Still Make a Good Economy Much Better]( – Oshan Jarow, Vox - [If You Want to Know Where the World Economy Is Headed, Look at the Bottom of This Toy Car]( – Erwin R. Tiongson, Washington Post Copyright © 2024 The Fiscal Times, All rights reserved. You are receiving this newsletter because you subscribed at our website or through Facebook. The Fiscal Times, 399 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States Want to change how you receive these emails? [Update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from thefiscaltimes.com

View More
Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

06/06/2024

Sent On

05/06/2024

Sent On

04/06/2024

Sent On

03/06/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.