Newsletter Subject

Supreme Court Rejects Biden’s Student Loan Relief Plan

From

thefiscaltimes.com

Email Address

newsletter@thefiscaltimes.com

Sent On

Fri, Jun 30, 2023 10:44 PM

Email Preheader Text

Plus, inflation drops again ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Plus, inflation drops again ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ [The Fisc](   By Michael Rainey Hope you’re having a great Friday, despite the smoke that is blanketing much of the country. The Supreme Court finished its term with a thunderous bang today, releasing a decision that backed a religious opponent of same-sex marriage and another that shut down a plan to forgive billions of dollars in student debt. Meanwhile, a key inflation measure dropped, and U.S. gasoline prices averaged $3.57 a gallon headed into the holiday weekend – 27% less than a year ago. We’ll be back in your inbox after the 4th of July holiday. Here’s what we’re watching in the meantime. Students protest the Supreme Court ruling. (Allison Bailey via Reuters Connect/NURPHOTO) Supreme Court Rejects Biden's Plan to Forgive Student Loans The Supreme Court on Friday rejected President Joe Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan, which would have provided as much as $20,000 in debt relief to millions of borrowers, at an estimated total cost of more than $400 billion. The court ruled in Biden v. Nebraska that the White House had exceeded its authority when it enacted the plan via executive order, rejecting the argument that the 2003 HEROES Act – which was passed in the wake of 9/11 and empowers the Secretary of Education to grant relief for student loan debts during a national emergency – provides the authority to forgive student loans during the Covid-19 health emergency. The decision upends a major part of Biden’s domestic agenda and lays the groundwork for millions of borrowers who thought their student loans had been forgiven to start making their payments again in October, when the pandemic-era suspension of payments comes to an end. What the plan would have done: The Biden administration announced last fall that Americans who earn less than $125,000 per year or $250,000 per household could apply for $10,000 in student loans debt forgiveness. Those who also received Pell grants, which are awarded only to low-income applicants, were eligible for another $10,000 in debt forgiveness. In total, nearly 46 million people in the U.S. owe about $1.6 trillion in student loan debt. More than 25 million people applied to the Biden program, with about 16 million receiving approval so far. But the program has been on hold in the wake of legal challenges, so no debt relief had been provided. What the justices said: Writing for the majority in the 6-3 decision, which split on ideological lines, Chief Justice John Roberts said the law does not give the Secretary of Education the right to forgive billions of dollars in student loan debt. "The Secretary’s plan canceled roughly $430 billion of federal student loan balances, completely erasing the debts of 20 million borrowers and lowering the median amount owed by the other 23 million from $29,400 to $13,600," Roberts wrote. "Six States sued, arguing that the HEROES Act does not authorize the loan cancellation plan. We agree." Roberts said the administration’s argument that the Secretary of Education has the power to “waive or modify” loan terms cannot apply to a program of this size. “The Secretary’s plan has ‘modified’ the cited provisions only in the same sense that ‘the French Revolution ‘modified’ the status of the French nobility’ — it has abolished them and supplanted them with a new regime entirely,” Roberts wrote, quoting language from an earlier case. Instead of modifying the loans, the Biden administration had essentially created “a novel and fundamentally different loan forgiveness program,” Roberts said, which is beyond its power. Bolstering his argument, Roberts quoted former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi on the matter. “People think that the President of the United States has the power for debt forgiveness,” Pelosi said in 2021, as cited in Roberts’ opinion. “He does not. He can postpone. He can delay. But he does not have that power. That has to be an act of Congress.” In her dissent, Justice Elena Kagan accused the majority of taking on matters of policy that are beyond its scope. “In every respect, the Court today exceeds its proper, limited role in our Nation’s governance,” she wrote, joined by Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor. “The result here is that the Court substitutes itself for Congress and the Executive Branch in making national policy about student-loan forgiveness,” she continued. “Congress authorized the forgiveness plan (among many other actions); the Secretary put it in place; and the President would have been accountable for its success or failure. But this Court today decides that some 40 million Americans will not receive the benefits the plan provides, because (so says the Court) that assistance is too ‘significan[t].’” Reaction roundup: In a statement, Biden decried the ruling and accused his opponents of favoring the interests of business owners over ordinary citizens during the pandemic. “The hypocrisy of Republican elected officials is stunning,” he said. “They had no problem with billions in pandemic-related loans to businesses – including hundreds of thousands and in some cases millions of dollars for their own businesses. And those loans were forgiven. But when it came to providing relief to millions of hard-working Americans, they did everything in their power to stop it.” Fiscal conservatives, who objected to the cost of the Biden plan, among other things, celebrated the decision. “The President’s unilateral student debt cancellation plan was expensive, inflationary, poorly targeted, and would have done nothing to improve the affordability of higher education,” the Committee for a Responsible Federal Government said in a statement. “With today’s Supreme Court decision, it’s time to put these costly cancellation schemes behind us.” Other conservatives focused on what they see as the unfairness of debt relief for people who went to college, with nothing for those who chose other paths. “The 87% of Americans without student loans are no longer forced to pay for the 13% who do,” said House Speaker Kevin McCarthy. Supporters of the Biden plan called on the White House to seek other options for student loan debt relief. "The Biden administration has remaining legal routes to provide broad-based student debt cancellation," Senate Majority Chuck Schumer said. "With the pause on student loan payments set to expire in weeks, I call upon the administration to do everything in its power to deliver for millions of working- and middle-class Americans struggling with student loan debt.” What comes next: Speaking Friday afternoon at the White House, Biden outlined the steps his administration is taking and plans to take to address student loan debt. Biden said he would switch the legal basis for his debt relief plan, using the Higher Education Act of 1965 instead of the HEROES Act. The 1965 law gives the Secretary of Education the power to “compromise, waive or release any right, title, claim, lien or demand, however acquired, including any equity or any right of redemption.” “In my view, it’s the best path that remains to providing as many borrowers as possible with debt relief,” Biden said while warning that it would take some time to work out the process. Biden also said that the Department of Education would give student loan debtors a 12-month grace period, creating an “on-ramp repayment program” that removes the threat of delinquency or default for one year starting on October 1. Number of the Day: 3.8% In another sign that inflation is decelerating, the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index rose 3.8% on an annual basis and 0.1% on a monthly basis in May, the Commerce Department reported Friday. Closely watched by Federal Reserve, the price index recorded its smallest gain since April 2021. The core index, which strips out volatile food and fuel prices, also fell, inching down a tenth of a point to an increase of 4.6% on an annual basis and 0.3 % on a monthly basis. (See the chart from [RSM]( below.) “While there are some glimmers of progress in the inflation data, the rate remains well above the Fed’s 2% target,” [says]( Bloomberg’s Reade Pickert. “In light of that, central bank officials have signaled they’re anticipating having to increase interest rates two more times this year — potentially beginning with next month’s meeting.” --------------------------------------------------------------- Send your feedback to yrosenberg@thefiscaltimes.com. And please encourage your friends to [sign up here]( for their own copy of this newsletter. --------------------------------------------------------------- Fiscal News Roundup - [Supreme Court Rejects Biden Student Loan Forgiveness Plan]( – Washington Post - [Biden to Try Again to Cancel Student Loan Debt]( – Wall Street Journal - [Biden Launches New Effort to Salvage Student Loan Relief Plan]( – Roll Call - [GOP Ribs Pelosi After Roberts Cites Her in Student Loans Decision]( – The Hill - [Biden Admin Revises Drug Negotiation Program Amid Legal Onslaught]( – The Hill - [American States Once Awash In Cash See Their Fortunes Suddenly Reversed]( – Bloomberg - [US Inflation Cools, Spending Stagnates as Economy Loses Steam]( – Bloomberg - [Biden Administration Failed to Foresee Afghanistan Mayhem, Review Finds]( – Washington Post Views and Analysis - [The Supreme Court’s Conservatives Change the Rules of the Game]( – Ankush Khardori, New York - [Conservatives Are on a Roll in Their Quest to Remake America Through the Courts]( – Stephen Collinson, CNN - [Supreme Court Decides Fake Plaintiffs Are Good Plaintiffs]( – David Dayen, American Prospect - [The Supreme Court Can’t Kill Student-Loan Relief]( – Kevin T. Dugan, New York - [Student Debt, America's Avoidable Disaster]( – Kathryn A. Edwards, Bloomberg - [The Sheer Pain Coming From the Student Debt Decision]( – Peter Coy, New York Times - [A ‘Bidenomics’ Factory Boost, but Maybe Not in Reshoring]( – Brooke Sutherland, Bloomberg - [The Great US Treasury Bond Rout Is Far From Over]( – Bill Dudley, Bloomberg - [Why Smart Taxes Have to Be Part of the Debt Puzzle]( – Washington Post Editorial Board Copyright © 2023 The Fiscal Times, All rights reserved. You are receiving this newsletter because you subscribed at our website or through Facebook. The Fiscal Times, 399 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States Want to change how you receive these emails? [Update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from thefiscaltimes.com

View More
Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

22/05/2024

Sent On

21/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.