Newsletter Subject

Surprise! The IRS Is Doing Better

From

thefiscaltimes.com

Email Address

newsletter@thefiscaltimes.com

Sent On

Mon, Mar 6, 2023 11:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

Plus: Fitch warns on US credit rating ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Plus: Fitch warns on US credit rating ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ [The Fisc](   By Yuval Rosenberg and Michael Rainey Happy Monday! This will be a big week for developments in the key fiscal fights of the year, as President Joe Biden is set to release his budget request on Thursday. Biden will unveil the plan with “unusual fanfare,” [Reuters notes]( travelling to Philadelphia to deliver a speech at a campaign-style event at a union hall — “a venue in a competitive battleground state that will highlight the president's worker-centric political pitch in the weeks running up to his expected announcement of a 2024 re-election bid.” Shalanda Young, who heads the White House Office of Management and Budget, said last week that Biden’s plan would reflect four core priorities: growing the economy “from the bottom up and middle out,” as Biden likes to say; lowering costs; protecting Social Security and Medicare; and reducing the deficit by $2 trillion over 10 years. Also ahead this week, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell will appear before Senate and House panels for his semi-annual monetary policy updates and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen will testify before the House Ways and Means Committee Friday about Biden’s budget. Fitch Warns on US Credit Rating: 'Playing With Live Ammunition' The U.S. has a perfect AAA credit rating from Fitch Ratings, one of three major agencies that grade public and private debt. But James McCormack, Fitch’s global head of sovereign ratings, [told CNN]( Monday that the country’s credit rating may be at risk as Congress battles over raising the debt ceiling, even if lawmakers come to an agreement that avoids a default. McCormack warned that “repeated episodes” of conflict over raising the debt ceiling “chip away” at the nation’s status as the dominant player in the global economy, raising questions about the level of risk inherent in U.S. debt instruments, which have long been as close to risk-free as investors can get. “When investors have to think about that, that’s not what you’re looking for in a risk-free asset, right?” McCormack said, referring to the possibility that the U.S. could fail to meet its obligations in full and on time. Even if that outcome is avoided, a contentious lead-up to an eventual agreement this summer could cause global financial markets to react negatively, threatening the status of both U.S. debt and the dollar — a course of events that could result in a credit downgrade by Fitch. McCormack made it clear that the ratings agency takes the burgeoning standoff very seriously, even if the operating assumption is still that an agreement will be reached. “We are more concerned this time around,” he said, citing the heightened degree of polarization in Washington. “You’re playing with live ammunition here,” he added. “This is an extremely dangerous situation. There is a lot at stake.” The McCarthy Aide Who Will Be a Key Player in Debt and Budget Battles If you’re monitoring the debt-limit battle between House Republicans and the White House, here’s a name you should know: Dan Meyer, chief of staff to House Speaker Kevin McCarthy. Meyer, who had been a prominent Republican lobbyist, was also chief of staff for former Speaker Newt Gingrich, and he served as White House director of legislative affairs under President George W. Bush. Now, as The Washington Post’s Jeff Stein, Leigh Ann Caldwell and Theodoric Meyer write, he’s set to play a key role in this year’s drama over the debt limit: “Despite more than three decades working in the upper echelons of Republican politics, Meyer, 68, is not a household name. And yet no other person — save McCarthy — is expected to play a more pivotal role this year in trying to steer House Republicans through a series of potentially explosive conflicts with the White House and each other over the nation’s spending and debt, with the fate of the global economy hanging in the balance. “While Capitol Hill waits to see how McCarthy wields power, his most important adviser has already emerged as a source of comfort for those in establishment Washington nervous about the prospect of a U.S. default later this year. Although McCarthy has vowed to ‘change Washington as we know it today,’ he has tapped the consummate insider — a former lobbyist connected to the old Republican guard who is widely respected among Democrats — to lead his office. And that alone has assured many former colleagues on K Street that Republicans will find a way to raise the federal debt limit later this year without triggering an economic crisis, despite warnings from conservatives about the budget fight ahead.” [Read the full story at The Washington Post.]( Surprise! The IRS Is Doing Better Early this year, National Taxpayer Advocate Erin M. Collins told Congress that she had begun to see progress at the Internal Revenue Service. “We have begun to see light at the end of the tunnel. I am just not sure how much further we need to travel before we see sunlight,” she wrote in an annual report released on January 11. Now, The Washington Post’s Jacob Bogage [reports]( that, thanks to a funding boost, the long-beleaguered tax agency is reaching “a once-unimaginable position.” It’s … functioning: “The IRS is answering 90 percent of its phone calls, has squashed its backlog of overdue returns, introduced new online taxpayer tools to keep pace with private software companies and processed 99.7 percent of returns filed this tax season, according to agency reports.” Bogage reports that the IRS has used nearly $850 million in funding from last year’s Inflation Reduction Act, the law passed by Democrats and assailed by Republicans for providing the tax agency an additional $80 billion over 10 years. As their first piece of legislation, House Republicans voted to repeal most of that funding, though the bill isn’t likely to go any further. While the political sniping over the new law continued, the IRS says it has hired more than 5,000 employees, mostly to answer taxpayer phone calls and staff tax clinics. It reportedly posted another 5,300 job openings last month. In all, Bogage reports, the agency has used $847.6 million in new funding, including $426 million for taxpayer services and about $315 million for “operations support, training new employees and preparing software systems for changes in tax laws.” About $100 million has gone toward modernizing business systems. Just $6.6 million so far has been spent on tax enforcement, the most controversial part of the funding. The bottom line: The IRS is on track for a “normal” tax season, which certainly hasn’t been the norm in recent years. “I think they understand a disastrous filing season would be catastrophic,” Mark Mazur, a former assistant Treasury secretary for tax policy in the Biden administration, tells the Post. “That would basically mean, ‘We gave you money — you did such a bad job spending it, we’re taking it back.’” A Plan to Discourage Early Social Security Claims Concerned about the number of Americans who are claiming Social Security in their early 60s, a bipartisan group of senators is reportedly calling for changes in how the federal government explains the options workers have as they weigh their retirement dates. The lawmakers — including Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), Chris Coons (D-DE), Susan Collins (R-ME) and Tim Kaine (D-VA) — note that while workers can choose to retire once they turn 62, doing so results in lower monthly payments and a smaller lifetime payout on average. “When to claim Social Security benefits is a critical decision for older Americans planning their retirement,” the senators wrote in a letter to the Social Security Administration, according to [CNBC](. “Most people, however, do not claim benefits at the age that would maximize their income in retirement, usually because they claim too early.” The Social Security Administration says that as of 2019, nearly 35% of men and 40% of women claimed their benefits at 62. According to a study by the investment firm United Income cited by the senators, millions of American retirees claim Social Security “at a financially sub-optimal time,” resulting in a collective loss of $3.4 trillion, or more than $100,000 per household. While there are many reasons workers may opt to retire at the earliest age possible — including joblessness, financial setbacks, looming poverty and failing health — the senators say it is important that potential retirees understand the long-term costs and benefits associated with their decisions. New labels: The lawmakers propose to change the way Social Security describes the cutoffs for receiving different levels of benefits. Currently, those who turn 62 are said to have reached “early eligibility age,” which allows retirees to receive benefits but at a permanently lower rate (the reductions are described [here]( those who reach 66 or 67, depending on birth year, are at “full retirement age,” with standard benefits; while those who wait until age 70 have earned “delayed retirement credits” for each month they wait, which provides the maximum payout (described [here](. To clarify the various benefit levels associated with different retirement ages, the lawmakers want to describe the cutoffs as “minimum benefit age” for those who choose to retire early; “standard benefit age” for those who wait until the basic retirement age; and “maximum benefit age” for those who wait, up until age 70. In addition, the lawmakers want the Social Security Administration to resume its previous practice of mailing paper statements to all future beneficiaries, and to do so more frequently. The updates would provide clear statements of how much each retiree would receive if they choose to retire at 62, 70 or anywhere in between. --------------------------------------------------------------- Send your feedback to yrosenberg@thefiscaltimes.com. And please encourage your friends to [sign up here]( for their own copy of this newsletter. --------------------------------------------------------------- News - [Biden Budget to Draw Battle Lines With GOP on Taxes, Spending Ahead of 2024 Campaign]( – Wall Street Journal - [Biden to Unveil Budget, Deficit Cuts in Philly on Thursday, White House Says]( – Philadelphia Inquirer - [Biden Finds a New Target in His War on GOP Budget Cutters]( – Washington Examiner - [The Kevin McCarthy Aide Tasked With Defusing the GOP’s Debt Limit Bomb]( – Washington Post - [House GOP Readies Its First Big Agenda Push: A Massive Energy Bill]( – Politico - [Senators Call For Two Changes to Help Encourage Social Security Beneficiaries to Claim Retirement Benefits Later]( – CNBC - [Biden Embarks on Most Ambitious Use of Federal Economic Power in Decades]( – Washington Post - [These Charts Show How Worried Investors Are About the Debt Ceiling]( – Bloomberg - [A Mile-Long Line for Free Food Offers a Warning as COVID Benefits End]( – Washington Post - [Republican Senators Ask US Intelligence Chief for Evidence Behind Latest Assessment of Covid-19 Pandemic Origins]( – CNN Views and Analysis - [Options for Reducing the Deficit]( – Phill Swagel, Congressional Budget Office - [9 Key Moments That Show How the U.S. Debt Grew to $31 Trillion]( – Jeff Stein, Washington Post - [The Debt-Limit Time Machine: What the Last 10 Big Fights Tell Us About This One]( – Jennifer Scholtes and Caitlin Emma, Politico - [The Programs You’d Have to Cut to Balance the Budget]( – Alicia Parlapiano, Margot Sanger-Katz and Josh Katz, New York Times - [Republican Votes Helped Washington Pile Up Debt]( – Jim Tankersley, New York Times - [Social Security, Medicare Clash Comes Down to What Constitutes a ‘Cut’]( – Mike Lillis, The Hill - [What Paul Krugman Gets Wrong About Social Security]( – C. Eugene Steuerle, Tax Policy Center - [The Deficit Hawks Are Circling the Biden Administration]( – Jason Linkins, New Republic - [COVID-19 Vaccines Won’t Be Free for Long. What Will They Cost?]( – Sheldon H. Jackson, The Hill - [Why the Recession Is Always Six Months Away]( – Nick Timiraos, Wall Street Journal - [To Revitalize Downtowns, Cities Need to Stop Making This Big Mistake]( – Washington Post Editorial Board Copyright © 2023 The Fiscal Times, All rights reserved. You are receiving this newsletter because you subscribed at our website or through Facebook. The Fiscal Times, 399 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States Want to change how you receive these emails? [Update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from thefiscaltimes.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.