Newsletter Subject

Manchin Fires Back as Dems Accuse Him of 'Betrayal'

From

thefiscaltimes.com

Email Address

newsletter@thefiscaltimes.com

Sent On

Mon, Dec 20, 2021 11:57 PM

Email Preheader Text

Plus, did the senator really kill Biden's big bill? ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Plus, did the senator really kill Biden's big bill? ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ [The Fisc](   By Yuval Rosenberg and Michael Rainey Happy Monday! We had kinda been worried that with Congress out, this week would leave us little to cover. Guess Joe Manchin and Omicron made sure that wouldn't happen. [*] Did Manchin Really Kill Biden's Big Bill? So what now? Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) stunned and infuriated the White House and fellow Democrats Sunday by announcing in an interview on “Fox News Sunday” that he’s a “no” on the president’s Build Back Better plan. Democratic leaders spent months negotiating with Manchin, confident that could address his many concerns and win his vote, a must if they were going to pass their massive package of health care reforms, social spending, climate programs and tax changes. “If he were going to say no, he would have said no by now,” Sen. Chris Coons (D-DL), a close White House ally, said just last week. Then Manchin said no. “I cannot vote to continue with this piece of legislation. I just can’t. I’ve tried everything humanly possible. I can’t get there,” Manchin told Fox’s Bret Baier. "This is a no on this piece of legislation.” Here’s a look at the shockwaves Manchin’s announcement sent through Washington and what may come next as President Joe Biden and Democrats scramble to salvage their agenda. A deteriorating relationship: The White House was rocked by Manchin’s bombshell, even as the senator had long made clear he had [serious reservations]( about almost every element of the legislation and had said he would be fine if Democrats [did nothing]( on Biden’s spending plan. White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki responded Sunday to Manchin’s announcement by releasing a lengthy, scorching [statement]( — that Biden himself reportedly approved — accusing the senator of going back on his word: “Senator Manchin’s comments this morning on FOX are at odds with his discussions this week with the President, with White House staff, and with his own public utterances. Weeks ago, Senator Manchin committed to the President, at his home in Wilmington, to support the Build Back Better framework that the President then subsequently announced. Senator Manchin pledged repeatedly to negotiate on finalizing that framework ‘in good faith.’” Psaki added that Manchin had given Biden his own written outline for the Build Back Better bill just days earlier. “While that framework was missing key priorities, we believed it could lead to a compromise acceptable to all,” Psaki said. “Senator Manchin promised to continue conversations in the days ahead, and to work with us to reach that common ground. If his comments on FOX and written statement indicate an end to that effort, they represent a sudden and inexplicable reversal in his position, and a breach of his commitments to the President and the Senator’s colleagues in the House and Senate.” Manchin’s off on the economics: Psaki’s statement also hit back on concerns Manchin had raised that the legislation would fuel inflation and add to the national debt. She again argued that the bill would ease long-term price pressures. And while Manchin and other fiscal conservatives have decried the use of budget gimmicks to lower the official cost of the bill, Psaki said that it “is the most fiscally responsible major bill that Congress has considered in years, and reduces the deficit in the long run.” Jim Tankersley of The New York Times [reports]( that economists by and large back the White House on the inflation question. “[Economic evidence]( strongly suggests Mr. Manchin is wrong. A host of economists and independent analyses have concluded that the bill is not economic stimulus, and that it will not pump enough money into consumer pocketbooks next year to raise prices more than a modest amount. Economic growth could take a hit: Goldman Sachs Chief Economist Jan Hatzius said Manchin’s rejection of the Build Back Better package will likely mean lower GDP growth next year. “BBB enactment had already looked like a close call and in light of Manchin’s comments we are adjusting our forecast to remove the assumption that BBB will become law,” Hatzius said in a note to clients. Goldman lowered its projection for GDP growth from 3% to 2% in the first quarter of 2022, from 3.5% to 3.0% in the second quarter, and from 3% to 2.75% in the third quarter. Hatzius also said he expects inflation to continue to be an issue, which could affect the fate of the bill next year. “With headline CPI reaching as high as 7% in the next few months in our forecast before it begins to fall, the inflation concerns that Sen. Manchin and others have already expressed are likely to persist, making passage more difficult,” the firm also noted. Progressives say ‘I told you so:’ Saying that the people of Manchin’s home state of West Virginia would “directly benefit from childcare, pre-Medicare expansion, and long term care” included in the legislative package, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-NY) accused Democrats of pursuing a flawed strategy on the bill. “This is exactly what we warned would happen if we separated Build Back Better from infrastructure,” Omar tweeted. Fellow progressive Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said she was not surprised by Manchin’s comments. “People can be mad at Manchin all they want, but we knew he would do this months ago,” she tweeted. Ocasio-Cortez blamed the leaders of the Democratic party for situation. “*They* chose to move BIF alone instead of w/ BBB, not Manchin,” she said, referring to the infrastructure and Build Back Better bills. “So they need to fix it.” Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) charged that Manchin had “betrayed” the president. “Either the president did not have a commitment or the senator made a commitment and went back. And I believe the president when he says he had a commitment,” Jayapal said Monday. There are still questions, however, about what kind of commitment Manchin did or did not make to the White House. Manchin defiant: Some on Capitol Hill questioned the tone of the White House response, and in an interview Monday with a West Virginia radio station, Manchin hit back, slamming Biden’s staff. "They figured surely to God we can move one person. We surely can badger and beat one person up. Surely we can get enough protesters to make that person uncomfortable enough that they'll just say, 'OK I'll vote for anything,'" he said. "Well, guess what? I'm from West Virginia. I'm not from where they're from and they can just beat the living crap out of people and think they'll be submissive." Manchin indicated that White House staff had angered him during negotiations, leading to his announcement: “I understand it's staff. It is not the president. This is staff. And they drove some things, and they put some things out, that were absolutely inexcusable. They know what it is." Can Build Back Better be built back better? The White House and other Democrats still hope that they can bring their bill back from the dead. “Just as Senator Manchin reversed his position on Build Back Better,” Psaki said in her statement, “we will continue to press him to see if he will reverse his position yet again, to honor his prior commitments and be true to his word.” She told reporters Monday that “what's most on the president's mind is the risk of inaction." Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) vowed Monday to bring the legislation up for a vote despite Manchin’s announcement, adding an obvious shot at his fellow Democrat. “Senators should be aware that the Senate will, in fact, consider the Build Back Better Act, very early in the new year so that every Member of this body has the opportunity to make their position known on the Senate floor, not just on television,” Schumer wrote in a letter to colleagues. “We are going to vote on a revised version of the House-passed Build Back Better Act – and we will keep voting on it until we get something done.” Schumer added that the Senate would also take up voting rights legislation and that Democrats would consider changes to the filibuster rules if Republicans continue to clock that bill. While the intraparty sniping since Sunday morning doesn’t bode well for any chance of resurrecting the legislation, Manchin on Monday left the door open to a new version of the bill. The Washington Post [reports]( that Manchin’s offer last week was for a $1.8 trillion package that included universal prekindergarten, an expansion of Obamacare and funding for climate change programs — but excluded an extension of Biden’s expanded child tax credit. (“In recent months, Manchin has told several of his fellow Democrats that he thought parents would waste monthly child tax credit payments on drugs instead of providing for their children,” HuffPost [reported]( Monday, citing two sources familiar with the senator’s comments.) In his interview, Manchin reportedly again [criticized]( the artificial sunsets for programs that Democrats used to hold down the official cost of their package and said he had only agreed to press ahead with Democrats’ budget reconciliation bill because wanted a plan that rolled back the 2017 Republican tax cuts. He added that he wants to lower the cost of more prescription drugs than the House version of the bill covers. “If you’re going to negotiate then negotiate,” he said. “Don’t start picking and choosing and playing games.” Manchin also called for means testing and work requirements for benefits such as the expanded child tax credit. And he would want committee hearings about the legislation. Those demands may be impossible to square with those of other Democrats. Senator Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ), for example, had opposed raising marginal tax rates and broader plans to lower prescription drug prices. The bottom line: Manchin and Biden reportedly [had a cordial conversation]( Sunday night, and party leaders aren’t giving up on the bill. Democrats could still try to salvage a scaled-back version in a reconciliation package. Senate Democrats are set to hold a virtual meeting Tuesday evening, which could help clarify the party’s path forward. No matter what, lawmakers will likely be dealing with the Build Back Better bill — or at least specific parts of it — for weeks or months to come. Send your feedback to yrosenberg@thefiscaltimes.com. And please tell your friends they can [sign up here]( for their own copy of this newsletter. News - [Manchin’s Private Offer to Biden Included Pre-k, Climate Money, Obamacare — but Excluded Child Benefit]( – Washington Post - [Manchin to Dems: Redo the Whole Thing, Maybe I'll Vote for It]( – Politico - [Schumer Vows Vote on Build Back Better Legislation Despite Manchin’s Opposition]( – Washington Post - [From Charm Offensive to Scorched Earth: How Biden’s Fragile Alliance With Manchin Unraveled]( – Washington Post - [Super-Rich Americans Feel Relief as Tax Hikes Are Canceled for Now]( – Bloomberg - [10 Million Children Will Fall Back Into Poverty When the Enhanced Child Tax Credit Ends]( – CNBC - [New York City Seeks Federal Help as U.S. Braces for Record Cases With Omicron Wave]( – Washington Post - [Moderna Booster Shot Should Provide ‘Good Level of Protection’ Against Omicron, Vaccine-Maker Says]( – Washington Post - [Trump Met With Boos After Revealing He Received Covid-19 Booster]( – CNN Views and Analysis - [Why Manchin Torpedoed Biden's Big Bill]( – Charlie Dent, CNN - [White House Incivility Is What 'Lost' Joe Manchin]( – Steve Clemons, The Hill - [The Path Ahead for Biden: Overcome Manchin’s Inflation Fears]( – Jim Tankersley, New York Times - [Manchin Hits Back at Effort to ‘Badger’ Him, Reinforcing Democrats’ Gamble]( – Aaron Blake, Washington Post - [With Manchin’s ‘No,’ Biden and Schumer Have No One to Blame but Themselves]( – Marc A. Thiessen, Washington Post - [Joe Manchin Isn’t the Only Obstacle to Build Back Better]( – Eugene Robinson, Washington Post - [Manchin’s Rebuff of Build Back Better Is the Latest Failure of Democrats Playing Soft]( – James Downie, Washington Post - [No Christmas Cheer for Joe Manchin. What Did He Expect?]( – Jennifer Rubin, Washington Post - [Sen. Joe Manchin’s Position on Build Back Better Reflects the Reality of West Virginia Politics]( – Karen Tumulty, Washington Post - [Here’s What Families Are Actually Using the Child Tax Credit to Pay For]( – Ella Ceron and Kelsey Butler, Bloomberg - [A Key Challenge for Biden: Those Most at Risk Are His Biggest Critics]( – Philip Bump, Washington Post Copyright © 2020 The Fiscal Times, All rights reserved. You are receiving this newsletter because you subscribed at our website or through Facebook. The Fiscal Times, 399 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States Want to change how you receive these emails? [Update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe](

EDM Keywords (208)

years wrong would worried work word win wilmington weeks week website washington wants wanted want vote use us unsubscribe understand true tone told think things surprised surely support sudden subscribed statement staff square situation sign set senator senate see schumer says saying say salvage said rocked risk reverse revealing resurrecting represent remove releasing rejection reduces receiving receive rebuff reality reach raised put pursuing providing protection projection programs press president preferences poverty position plan piece people pay pass party package others opportunity one odds obstacle obamacare nothing note next newsletter negotiate need must morning months mind matter marc manchin make mad lower look likely light letter legislation leaders lawmakers know knew kinda kind issue interview infuriated infrastructure impossible house host honor home hold hill high happen going god giving get funding friends framework fox forecast fix fisc fine finalizing feedback fate families fall facebook extension expansion excluded example exactly end effort economists early drove dl discussions difficult democrats deficit decried dealing dead criticized cost copy continue considered congress concluded commitments commitment comments colleagues clock chose choosing change chance canceled bring breach braces boos body blame bill biden betrayed benefits believed believe begins beat bbb badger az aware assumption argued anything announcing announcement angered analysis agreed agenda adjusting added add 2022

Marketing emails from thefiscaltimes.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.