Plus, can Democrats finally bring down drug prices? Â [The Fisc]( Â Â By Yuval Rosenberg and Michael Rainey How Biden Is Expanding Obamacare as the Law Turns 11
President Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law 11 years ago. President Biden and Democrats marked the anniversary Tuesday by celebrating the law â even as they look to continue to expand it and defend it against a challenge in the Supreme Court. After years of Republican attacks and Trump administration efforts to undercut the law, Obamacare is now expanding. âOn this anniversary, we should remember just how close we have come to losing that act that we fought so hard for, and we have a duty not just to protect it but to make it better and keep becoming a nation where health care is a right for all and not a privilege for a few,â Biden said in a speech Tuesday in Ohio. Bidenâs Covid-19 rescue act temporarily raised Obamacare premium subsidies for two years to help better deliver on the ACAâs titular promise of making insurance coverage more affordable. âThe provision in the $1.9 trillion âAmerican Rescue Planâ is the first major change to the health law since its passage,â Sheryl Gay Stolberg writes at [The New York Times](. âThe [new subsidies]( last for only two years, and it will take some time for the full emergency aid to reach people. Even so, nearly everyone who buys insurance will be eligible to do so at a discount.â On top of that, at least two red states, Alabama and Wyoming, are also considering whether to expand Medicaid under the ACA now that the Covid-relief package sweetened the incentives for doing so. And a special enrollment period opened by the Biden administration last month to allow more people to get ACA plans in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic has seen more than 206,000 people sign up in its first two weeks. Biden, who memorably told Obama that the health reform law was a âbig f---ing deal,â announced Tuesday that the special enrollment period, which had been slated to run until May 15, will now be extended through August 15. âThe ACA is over a decade old and this is literally the first time that Democrats have been successful at improving it,â analyst Larry Levitt of the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation told the [Associated Press](. âDemocrats have succeeded politically by selling the ACAâs protections for preexisting conditions, but affordability has always been a challenge. And now Democrats have successfully improved the premium help available under the law.â Pandemic puts the ACA to the test: âWe still have millions of people walking around without insurance,â Jonathan Cohn, the author of a new history of the enactment of the ACA, told [The Washington Post](. âThe pandemic was a reminder that we still have huge gaps in our health care system, with immense human consequences.â Obamacare may have helped close some of those gaps, though. The Kaiser Family Foundation estimated late last year that some 2 million to 3 million people may have lost employer-based coverage as the pandemic raged between March and September. But it added that many of those who lost coverage through their jobs were eligible for Medicaid or subsidized ACA plans. âThis is really the first true test of the A.C.A.,â the foundationâs Cynthia Cox told the Times. âIn past recessions, you usually see the uninsured rate increase significantly. We donât know for sure yet, but all indications are that the uninsured rate has not gone up by much, likely in large part thanks to the A.C.A.â KFFâs Levitt added in a [tweet]( âThe right still views the ACA as a government overreach. The left sees it as not going far enough in guaranteeing universal coverage and getting profit out of health care. But, imagine this pandemic and economic crisis without the ACA there as a safety net.â More tests ahead: Biden may have scored relatively easy wins via both executive action and legislation, but advancing other elements of his health care agenda â the creation of a public option to compete with private insurers on the ACA exchanges, expanding Medicare eligibility and lowering prescription drug prices â likely will prove much more challenging. âThese mainly require the support of Congress, where Democrats hold only slim majorities in both houses -- and some in the party are still pushing for more dramatic changes, including enacting âMedicare for All,ââ CNNâs Tami Luhby [says](. The Biden administration is reportedly considering a push to allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices as a way to help pay for some [$3 trillion in new spending]( it plans to propose. âWeâve got to address the sectorâs pricing abuses, and thatâs fundamentally the big question the administration and Congress are facing,â Frederick Isasi, executive director of Families U.S.A., a consumer advocacy group, told the Times. âAre they going to have the political will to do that?â Politico [reports]( that that the answer may well be yes (see more on this below). As for the public option, Biden still faces pressure from within his own party to go further. Progressives recently introduced another Medicare for All bill, an approach to health care reform that Biden has rejected. Then thereâs the Supreme Court challenge. The Biden administration last month urged to court to uphold the law in the face of a Republican-led lawsuit seeking to invalidate it. The court heard arguments in the case last November and is expected to hand down a ruling by July. Can Democrats Finally Bring Down Drug Prices?
Democratic lawmakers are getting behind a plan to enable the Department of Health and Human Services to negotiate the prices of some drugs covered by Medicare, potentially saving the federal government billions of dollars, but they face serious resistance from two key players: Republicans and the major pharmaceutical firms. No Republican lawmakers are expected to back the drug price proposal, all but eliminating the possibility that it could pass through Congress under normal rules. But Democrats are now reportedly considering adding the proposal to their next budget reconciliation bill, allowing them to pass it with a simple majority â and greatly increasing the odds that substantial drug pricing reform could occur in the coming months. Looking for offsets: The idea of allowing the federal government to negotiate drug prices isnât new, but itâs taken on new prominence as Democrats look for ways to pay for their next big economic package, which is expected to contain roughly $3 trillion in new spending on things like infrastructure, education and green energy. Lowering drug prices is particularly attractive, since it would be appealing to voters while freeing up money that would have been spent on medicine to be used elsewhere. âThe huge difference between drug prices and literally everything else out there: Everything else costs money, and this one saves money,â Alex Lawson, executive director of Social Security Works, [told]( Politico. Sanders takes aim: Holding the first hearing of the new Congress on drug prices Tuesday, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) asked, âWhy does the U.S. pay the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs?â Answering his own question, Sanders charged that the drug companies are in control on Capitol Hill. âI think itâs fair to say that itâs not Congress which regulates the drug companies but the drug companies which regulate Congress, and that has got to change,â Sanders said. Along with more than two dozen Democratic lawmakers, Sanders is reintroducing a package of bills that aims to reduce drug prices. The Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Act ([summary here]( would remove the current prohibition on the head of HHS from negotiating drug prices, empowering that agency to lower the cost of many name-brand drugs covered by Medicare. According to one study, the federal government could save more than $15 billion a year if Medicare could negotiate the same prices paid by Medicaid and the Veterans Administration. The package also includes the Prescription Drug Price Relief Act, which would tie the price of prescription drugs in the U.S. to the median price in Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Japan; and the Affordable and Safe Prescription Drug Importation Act, which would permit the importation of drugs from Canada and other major countries. Drugmakers take notice: Tuesdayâs hearing, which was announced abruptly, was greeted with some alarm by pharmaceutical firms and their powerful lobbyists. One lobbyist told Politico that there is now concern that the drug industry could be seen as a âpiggy bankâ that could be tapped to help pay for the next economic package. âSomething is coming. Weâre just not sure when,â one drug industry source said. The outcome of the effort is far from guaranteed, however. Even without the need to win bipartisan support, itâs not clear that centrist Democrats are willing to back aggressive plans to rein in drug prices. Drug lobbyists are reportedly targeting Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) in an effort to break up the 50 Democratic votes in the Senate. And while Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) has indicated that he would back the plan to negotiate drug prices in Medicare, he hasnât said if he is willing to pass it through reconciliation. Number of the Day: 100 Million
Biden said Tuesday that his administration will have distributed 100 million relief payments by Wednesday. The economic impact payments, worth up to $1,400 per person for those who qualify, are part of the $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package the president signed into law earlier this month. Quote of the Day
âIf all eligible US residents are vaccinated in 2021, we project that the pandemic will effectively be over by the fall. With a vaccine take-up rate of 100 percent, effective population immunity would be attained at some point this summer, depending on the pace of vaccination.â â Alex Arnon and John Ricco of the Penn Wharton Budget Model, [writing]( Monday about the economic effects of the Covid-19 vaccine. The researchers warn that if 25% of those eligible refuse to take a vaccine and social activities return to close to their pre-pandemic levels, âthe epidemiological outlook for the spring and summer worsens considerably,â with millions of additional Covid-19 cases this year. Send your feedback to yrosenberg@thefiscaltimes.com. Follow us on Twitter: [@yuvalrosenberg]( [@mdrainey]( and [@TheFiscalTimes](. And please tell your friends they can [sign up here]( for their own copy of this newsletter. News - [Senate Confirms Shalanda Young to Be OMB Deputy, as Fight Emerges Over Who Should Lead It]( â CNN
- [White House Eyes Tax Increases on Companies and the Wealthy to Fund Infrastructure, Setting Up Clash With GOP]( â Washington Post
- [Infrastructure Plan Seeks to Address Climate and Equality as Well as Roads]( â New York Times
- [House Democrats Demand Answers on Slow $1,400 Checks]( â The Hill
- [Drugmakers Prepare for the Unusual: A Defeat in Washington]( â Politico
- [Senate Republicans Torn Over Return of Earmarks]( â The Hill
- [Businesses Urge Congress to Include Paid Family Leave in Next Spending Package]( â The Hill
- [Postmaster General Announces 10-Year Plan Including Longer Mail Delivery Times and Cuts to Post Office Hours]( â CNN
- [Powell Expects Inflation to Bump Up But It Wonât Get Out of Hand]( â Bloomberg
- [Battle Heats Up Over Pentagon Spending Plans]( â The Hill
- [Bipartisan Bill Would Bring $1.5 Billion to Spur New Housing]( â Bloomberg CityLab
- [The U.S. Unemployment System Is Plagued by $63 Billion in Fraud and Dysfunction]( â Bloomberg Businessweek
- [AstraZeneca Used âOutdated and Potentially Misleading Dataâ That Overstated the Effectiveness of Its Vaccine, Independent Panel Says]( â Washington Post
- [Enemy Within: Experts Warn US Not Learning From Past Pandemic Mistakes]( â The Hill Views and Analysis - [As the Affordable Care Act Turns 11, Biden's COVID Stimulus Helps It Live Up to Its Name]( â Laura Packard, USA Today
- [Invest in Children and Equality: Hand Out Baby Bonds]( â Andrea Gabor, Bloomberg
- [Every Democrat Who Fears Filibuster Reform Should Read These Two New Works]( â Greg Sargent, Washington Post
- [As a Second Batch of $1,400 Stimulus Payments Arrives This Week, Some Social Security and Other Federal Beneficiaries Are Left Out]( â Michelle Singletary, Washington Post
- [Vaccine Passports Wonât Get Us Out of the Pandemic]( â Saskia Popescu and Alexandra Phelan, New York Times
- [The Debt Whiners: Fools or Liars?]( â Dean Baker, CEPR Copyright © 2020 The Fiscal Times, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this newsletter because you subscribed at our website, [thefiscaltimes.com]( or through Facebook.
The Fiscal Times, 399 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States
Want to change how you receive these emails? [Update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe](