Newsletter Subject

Higher Taxes on the Rich? Americans Overwhelmingly Say Yes

From

thefiscaltimes.com

Email Address

newsletter@thefiscaltimes.com

Sent On

Wed, Feb 20, 2019 11:13 PM

Email Preheader Text

Plus, health care spending speeding higher By Yuval Rosenberg Higher Taxes on the Rich? Americans Ov

Plus, health care spending speeding higher By Yuval Rosenberg Higher Taxes on the Rich? Americans Overwhelmingly Say Yes President Trump has sought to tar Democrats as socialists, and his 2020 campaign spokesperson responded to Bernie Sanders’ announcement Tuesday that he’s making another bid for the White House by saying, in part, that “the American people will reject an agenda of sky-high tax rates.” But taxing the rich more remains wildly popular, according to a [new SurveyMonkey poll]( conducted for The New York Times — and nearly two-thirds of voters say the government should try to reduce inequality. The online survey of 9,974 adults was conducted from February 4 to 10. It has a modeled error estimate of plus or minus 1.5 percentage points. Among the poll’s findings: - More than 60 percent of Americans, including 51 percent of Republicans, support the proposal by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) to introduce a tax of 2 percent on households with a net worth above $50 million. - A slight majority of Americans supports a 70 percent top tax rate on incomes above $10 million a year, as suggested by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). - Sixty-two percent of Americans — including 87 percent of Democrats and 70 percent of independents — say the government should pursue policies to reduce the wealth gap. “Nearly two-thirds of Democrats say it is immoral to have an economic system where some people have billions of dollars while others have very little,” The Times’ Ben Casselman and Jim Tankersley report. The latest poll results [are in line]( with those of other recent surveys. Whether those poll numbers translate to electoral success is a whole other matter, though. “[Polls by Gallup]( and other organizations over the decades have regularly found that a majority of Americans believe that corporations and the wealthy pay too little in taxes, but voters have frequently elected presidents who cut those taxes, instead,” Casselman and Tankersley write. But the emphasis on taxing the rich among progressive candidates may make it more likely that taxes on top earners go up if Democrats win in 2020. At least that’s what progressive policy experts envision. “I bet it will be a lot of medium-sized things,” Michael Linden, a fellow at the liberal Roosevelt Institute, tells the Times. “A higher top rate, for sure. Rooting out or limiting some of the tax expenditures that disproportionately benefit the rich. I think the corporate rate will start to creep back up. And I think new taxes like a wealth tax, or some other form of capital taxation, are very likely.” Baby Boomers Will Drive Health Care Spending to Nearly $6 Trillion a Year by 2027 As baby boomers continue to age and the prices of medical goods and services rise, growth in annual health care spending is projected speed up over the next eight years, the government said Wednesday. Annual health care spending would grow to nearly $6 trillion, or almost 20 percent of the economy, by 2027, according to the projections. Health care spending is projected to rise by 4.8 percent in 2019, up from 4.4 percent last year — and is expected to grow at an average 5.5 percent a year from 2018 through 2027, actuaries at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said in a new report published Wednesday in the journal [Health Affairs](. That level of growth, the same as projected last year, would outpace the forecast for economic expansion by 0.8 percentage points a year. After climbing at an average rate of 7.3 percent a year from 1990 to 2007, health care spending grew more modestly for a number of years. Economists have debated whether that slowdown was largely the result of the Great Recession and its aftermath, or whether more fundamental structural shifts had taken hold that would lower growth rates longer-term. “As a result of economic and demographic trends, we expect health spending growth to increase over this next decade,” says Andrea Sisko, an economist in the Office of the Actuary at CMS and lead author of the study. “While Medicare spending is expected to accelerate the fastest among payers and contribute to the increase, growth in health prices and disposable personal income are also significant contributors.” Health Care as 20 Percent of the Economy: The U.S. spent more than $3.8 trillion on health care in 2018, or nearly 18 percent of gross domestic product. If the CMS projections hold true, health care spending will grow to $5.96 trillion, or 19.4 percent of the economy, by 2027. The share of health care spending financed by federal, state and local governments is expected to reach 47 percent by that year, up from 45 percent last year. “This increase is entirely accounted for by an increase in the federal government share, which largely reflects faster growth in Medicare spending as the baby boom generation continues to transition into the program,” Sisko told reporters. Prescription Drug Prices Rising Faster, Too: Spending on prescription drugs is expected to accelerate as well. Prescription-drug spending is projected to have grown 3.3 percent last year, up from 0.4 percent in 2017. As an increasing number of new drugs enter the market and prices continue to rise, spending on prescription drugs is expected to rise 4.6 percent this year and by 6.1 percent on average from 2020 through 2027. Medicare: As baby boomers continue to shift from private insurance to Medicare, growth in the government program’s spending will rise faster than for other payers. CMS estimates that 73.5 million people will be enrolled in Medicare by 2027, up from 57.2 million in 2017. It also said it expects annual Medicare enrollment growth to peak at 2.9 percent in 2019. Medicare spending is projected to have grown by 5.9 percent in 2018, up from 4.2 percent the year before, largely as the result of faster spending growth per enrollee (3.1 percent in 2018 versus 1.7 percent in 2017). And spending growth for the program is projected to accelerate further, reaching 7.1 percent this year and averaging 7.6 percent from 2020 through 2027. Medicaid: Spending growth for the health care program for low-income Americans is projected to have been 2.2 percent last year, down 0.7 percentage points, as the result of a fourth straight year of slower enrollment growth. But spending is expected to rise 4.8 percent this year, in part because of new Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act in Idaho, Maine, Nebraska, Utah and Virginia. Medicaid spending is expected to grow at an average annual rate of 6 percent from 2020 through 2027. Private insurers: Spending is projected to have grown by 4.5 percent last year and is expected to slot to 3.3 percent this year as some people choose to drop coverage now that the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate has been repealed. (Out-of-pocket spending, on the other hand, is expected to grow more quickly once fewer people have private coverage.) Private health insurance spending is expected to grow an average 5.1 percent a year from 2020 through 2027. Other key projections: - Prices for health care goods and services are projected to rise by an average 2.5 percent a year, accounting for almost half of the expected increase in personal health care outlays. - Hospital spending is projected to have grown by 4.4 percent in 2018 and is expected to rise by 5.1 percent this year and an average of 5.7 percent a year from 2020 through 2027. - The share of the population that has insurance is expected to remain stable around 90 percent over the next eight years. Keep in mind, though, that these are projections — and they’re not easy to make let alone nail. For one thing, they’re based on current law and do not try to predict how the health care system might change over the coming years. For example, CMS forecast last year that health care spending would grow by 5.3 percent in 2018, nearly a percentage point higher than it now projects they grew. Tell your fiscally minded friends about us! Let them know they can [sign up here]( to get their own copy of this newsletter. Send your tips and feedback to yrosenberg@thefiscaltimes.com. Or connect with us on Twitter: [@yuvalrosenberg]( [@mdrainey]( and [@TheFiscalTimes](. News - [Supreme Court Says Constitutional Protection Against Excessive Fines Applies to State Actions]( – Washington Post - [Record High Name Government as Most Important Problem]( – Gallup - [Dems Think They're Beating Trump in Emergency Declaration Battle]( – The Hill - [The 10 GOP Senators Who May Break with Trump on Emergency]( – The Hill - [Wall Street, Seeking Big Tax Breaks, Sets Sights on Distressed Main Streets]( – New York Times - [Durbin After Reading Green New Deal: 'What in the Heck Is This?']( – The Hill - [Amazon’s $0 Corporate Income Tax Bill Last Year, Explained]( – Vox - [CVS Predicts an Ugly 2019 After Closing $68 Billion Aetna Deal]( – Bloomberg - [Government Shutdown Cost Southwest Airlines $50 Million More Than Estimated]( – Dallas News - [Trump Threatens to Cancel California's $929 Million High-Speed Rail Grant]( – NPR - [Wilbur Ross' Financial Disclosure Rejected by Federal Ethics Agency]( – CNN - [West Virginia Teachers Score Victory in Their Latest Walkout. But the Fight Isn't Over]( – Time - [Candy-Colored Explosions in the Sky: The Stunning Phenomenon of the Aurora Borealis]( – Washington Post Views and Analysis - [No One in Congress Should Be Allowed to Avoid Voting on This Presidential Power Grab]( – Washington Post Editorial Board - [Lower Tax Refunds Show How the Republican Tax Cut Is Keeping Money in Your Hands All Year]( – Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX), USA Today - [Charting a Responsible Path for Discretionary Spending]( – Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget - [Trump Calls the Democratic Party Socialist. He’s Lying.]( – Jonathan Chait, New York - [Big Trend Among Democratic Presidential Candidates: Capitalism]( – Ed Kilgore, New York - [Heed Economic Lessons of Shutting Down Government]( – The Hill - [As Debt Hits $22 Trillion, Our Day of Fiscal Reckoning Nears]( – Bert Ely, The Hill - [Debt Does Matter]( – Jeffrey Carter, Points and Figures - [Deficit ‘Hawks’ Are Shouting at Market Signals That Mock Them]( – John Tamny, RealClear Markets Copyright © 2019 The Fiscal Times, All rights reserved. You are receiving this newsletter because you subscribed at our website, thefiscaltimes.com, or through Facebook. Our mailing address is: The Fiscal Times 399 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10022 [Add us to your address book]( If someone has forwarded this email to you, consider signing up for The Fiscal Times emails on our [website](. Want to change how you receive these emails? [Update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe](.

Marketing emails from thefiscaltimes.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.