Plus ... a Space Force!?!
By Yuval Rosenberg and Michael Rainey
Another Way Trumpâs Trade War Could Hurt the US
Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at the Bleakley Advisory Group, adds another wrinkle to the dangers of an emerging trade war. In a Monday morning email, Boockvar notes that foreigners were net sellers of U.S. notes and bonds for the second straight month in April. China and Japan were net sellers, leaving Japan now holding the lowest total of U.S. Treasuries since 2011, Boockvar says. And Russia responded to the U.S. imposing sanctions on some oligarchs by liquidating more than $47 billion worth of Treasuries, or nearly half its holdings.
Boockvar adds that foreigners have been net sellers of U.S. Treasuries since 2013. Their selling didnât matter to the market a few years ago because the Federal Reserve was still buying voraciously, but that has now changed. The Fed is reducing its balance sheet and the pace of foreign selling increased in October. âWhat is left is mostly domestic demand for US Treasuries, via pension funds, insurance companies and other funds,â Boockvar says.
His recommendation: âStart watching this data, even though it is somewhat dated when reported. We need all the help we can get in the search for buyers of US Treasuries due to the enormous supply coming our way in the next few years. Our stance on trade with our trading partners could very well play into this in coming months and quarters, especially with China, the largest owner of US Treasuries.â
Trump Calls for the Military to Add a Space Force
President Trump on Monday ordered the Defense Department to take steps to create a new branch of the military focused on space. "I am hereby directing the Department of Defense and Pentagon to immediately begin the process necessary to establish a space force as the sixth branch of the armed forces," Trump said during a meeting of the National Space Council.
Lawmakers and the Pentagon have been discussing the creation of a new, space-oriented organization within the military for decades. There was a U.S. Space Command back in 1985, which was folded into U.S. Strategic Command by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld in 2002. In April of 2017, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL), chair of the House Armed Services strategic forces subcommittee, said that the Air Force should create a Space Corps, which could eventually stand on its own, much as the U.S. Army Air Corps was spun off as the U.S. Air Force in 1947.
Trump mentioned the idea of a space force in March and again in May, saying he first used the name as joke but then realized it was a good idea.
Not everyone agrees on that last point. The proposal has met serious resistance from the Pentagon in the past, largely on the grounds that it would create new, unwanted layers of bureaucracy and [expense](. The 2018 defense policy bill ordered the Defense Department to study how space should be treated within the military. That study is ongoing, with a final report due at the end of the year.
Trump, who has asked Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford to work on the space force plan, will need help from lawmakers to see it through. Colin Clark of Breaking Defense [pointed out]( that the president cannot unilaterally create a new branch of the military. Congress would have to pass a law creating the space force.
A [tweet]( from Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) suggested that the presidentâs plan may be in for a rough ride on Capitol Hill: âThe president told a US general to create a new Space Force as 6th branch of military today, which generals tell me they donât want. Thankfully the president canât do it without Congress because now is NOT the time to rip the Air Force apart. Too many important missions at stake.â
Retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Dave Deptula also criticized the plan, [saying]( Monday that the space force plan was âanother example of ready, fire, aim.â
Map of the Day
[Axios]( breaks down how monthly premiums on benchmark Affordable Care Act policies have risen state by state since 2014. The average increase: $481.
House Committee to Mark Up Doomed 2019 Budget
House Budget Committee Chairman Steve Womack (R-AR) announced Monday that his panel will hold a two-day markup of the fiscal 2019 budget resolution on Wednesday and Thursday. The resolution reportedly could get out of committee, but the chances of it going anywhere from there are likely slim at best. Roll Callâs [Paul Krawzak explains]( âThere is no logistical reason for GOP leaders to make adopting a budget a priority this year; Februaryâs budget deal set statutory discretionary spending caps, obviating the need for a budget blueprintâs enforcement tools. Many Republicans donât necessarily want to use reconciliation procedures to jam through entitlement program cuts on a party-line vote that the GOP would own politically.â Womack will unveil the budget resolution [Tuesday at 2 p.m. EDT](.
Column of the Day: The Politics Behind Permanent Trillion-Dollar Deficits
Budget Guy Stan Collender [writes]( that budget deficits under the Trump administration are projected to hit $1 trillion in 2020 â and keep rising to $1.5 trillion in fiscal 2028. âBut whatâs most important,â Collender adds, âis that, no matter what Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney or any elected official may tell you, thereâs not much that Congress and the White House will be willing to do about this.â
Tax increases, spending cuts or faster economic growth could all change the deficit outlook, but political realities mean those changes arenât happening, Collender writes:
- Thereâs no tax increase on the horizon. Period.
- The trillion dollar deficits are already based on high economic growth.
- In the current hyper-partisan environment, military spending is uncuttable.
- That same hyper-partisan environment makes Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid almost as uncuttable.
- The incontrovertible coming demographic changes mean that spending for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid will increase under current law.
The bottom line, according to Collender: âTrumpâs trillion dollar budget deficits are permanent changes in the United Statesâs fiscal future.â
Their Finest Hour: Since we could use some inspiration, here's a reminder that on this date in 1940, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill delivered a speech to the House of Commons just over a month after taking office: "Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, 'This was their finest hour.'â
Send your feedback to yrosenberg@thefiscaltimes.com. Or connect with us on Twitter: [@yuvalrosenberg]( [@mdrainey]( and [@TheFiscalTimes](.
News
- [Republicans Give Up on Medicare Overhaul]( â Politico
- [Time Running Out in Paul Ryanâs Quest to Overhaul Welfare Programs]( â Roll Call
- [The Next Health Care Wars]( â Axios
- [Secret VA Nursing Home Ratings Hide Poor Quality Care from the Public]( â USA Today and Boston Globe
- [Congress Tackles Mounting Opioid Epidemic]( â The Hill
- [China Tariffs on U.S. Soybeans Could Cost Iowa Farmers up to $624 Million]( â Des Moines Register
- [HUD Moves to Evict Union from Federal Office Space]( â Government Executive
- [Lies, China and Putin: Solving the Mystery of Wilbur Ross' Missing Fortune]( â Forbes
- [Kim Jong Un More Popular Than Pelosi Among Republicans: Poll]( â Daily Beast
- [Hundreds of Children Wait in Border Patrol Facility in Texas]( â Associated Press
- [Trump Administration Could Be Holding 30,000 Border Kids by August, Officials Say]( â Washington Examiner
- [The Image of a Migrant Child That Broke a Photographerâs Heart]( â Washington Post
Views
- [Congress Must Fix Medicare Part D Mistake]( â Howard Dean, Morning Consult
- [Separating Children from Their Parents at the Border âBreaks My Heartâ]( â Laura Bush, Washington Post
- [New Warnings About Cuts to Social Security and Medicare Are a Reason to Worry]( â Paul Brandus, MarketWatch
- [Social Security Is Running Dry, and There's Only One Politically Viable Option to Save It]( â Patrick W. Watson, Forbes
- [Smoke, Mirrors and Social Security]( â Gene Epstein, Barronâs
- [Trump's Tax Cut Leads to Doubling of Job Growth In Low-Tax States Vs. High-Tax]( â Chuck DeVore, Forbes
- [Reform the Postal Service]( â Ross A. Marchand, E21
- [Here's Why We Should Put More Money into Alzheimer's Research]( â Andrew Tisch, The Hill
- [The Tax Cut and the Pay Increase: Halfway There]( â Dean Baker, Truthout
- [Why Employment Rates in the US Have Lagged Other Countries]( â Jason Furman, Wilson Powell, VoxEU
- [Why Would the Fed Want to Raise the Unemployment Rate a Full Percentage Point?]( â Jared Bernstein, Washington Post
Copyright © 2018 The Fiscal Times, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this newsletter because you subscribed at our website, thefiscaltimes.com.
Our mailing address is:
The Fiscal Times
712 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10019
[Add us to your address book](//thefiscaltimes.us1.list-manage.com/vcard?u=40d2c5373681f5cd830b6d823&id=714147a9cf)
If someone has forwarded this email to you, consider
signing up for The Fiscal Times emails on our [website](.
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can [update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe from this list](