Supreme Court Slaps Down Challenge to Consumer Watchdog

Plus: The cost of Biden's 2025 tax plan ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ [The Fisc](   By Yuval Rosenberg and Michael Rainey Happy Thursday! Here’s what’s going on. (Reuters) Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Watchdog's Funding Mechanism The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a constitutional challenge to the way the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded, delivering a blow to the agency’s right-wing critics and handing a win to the Biden administration. The CFPB was created under the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act and tasked with consolidating and supervising consumer protections, including those for financial products including mortgages and car loans, that had previously been the purview of various arms of the government. The legislation, passed in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis and signed into law by President Barack Obama, provided a different funding mechanism for the new agency: It gets money directly from the Federal Reserve rather than through the annual congressional budgeting and appropriations process. The agency says that it has delivered more than $20 billion in relief to hundreds of millions of Americans and handled more than 4 million consumer complaints. But it has also made some tenacious enemies who have subjected it to a barrage of criticisms and attacks over the years, with many on the right slamming what they see as regulatory overreach and unnecessary red tape. In a lawsuit, payday lenders challenged the agency’s funding structure, arguing that it violated the Constitution, which gives Congress the power of the purse. A federal appeals court in New Orleans had accepted that argument, ruling that the funding did violate the Constitution’s appropriations clause and allowed the agency to function without proper congressional oversight. In a 7-to-2 decision handed down on Thursday, the Supreme Court reversed that ruling. “Under the Appropriations Clause, an appropriation is simply a law that authorizes expenditures from a specified source of public money for designated purposes. The statute that provides the Bureau’s funding meets these requirements,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the majority [opinion](. Two of the court’s conservatives justices, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, dissented. “The court upholds a novel statutory scheme under which the powerful Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) may bankroll its own agenda without any congressional control or oversight,” Alito wrote. President Joe Biden and consumer advocates celebrated the decision. “Today’s Supreme Court ruling is an unmistakable win for American consumers,” Biden said in a statement. “In the face of years of attacks from extreme Republicans and special interests, the Court made clear that the CFPB’s funding authority is constitutional and that its strong record of consumer protection will not be undone.” Biden’s Plan to Extend Trump’s Tax Cuts Would Cost More Than $2 Trillion: Analysis President Biden is calling for the individual tax cuts signed into law by former President Trump in 2017 to expire as scheduled after next year, but with one major exception: Anyone earning less than $400,000 per year will get to keep those cuts, with the burden of higher taxes falling only on businesses and the wealthy. The White House has contrasted its position with that of Trump, who, along with many other Republicans, has called for extending the tax cuts for everyone. The Congressional Budget Office recently [estimated]( the cost of doing so would be something like $4.6 trillion over a decade. Trump has also suggested that he wants to pass even more tax cuts, though details have been lacking. Less has been said about the cost of Biden’s plan. But according to an analysis conducted for the news site Semafor by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, Biden’s proposal would cost between $2 billion and $3 billion over 10 years, depending on how it is implemented. Democrats say they plan to raise taxes on businesses and the rich to cover the cost of keeping the 2017 tax cuts in place for working- and middle-class households. Although they have not yet offered a comprehensive proposal, White House officials have indicated that they plan to raise the corporate income tax rate, crack down on wealthy tax avoiders and enforce a global minimum tax for major corporations. It could be a challenge, though, to find enough funding to cover the cost of maintaining the Trump tax cuts, especially if a second Biden administration wants to boost its spending on domestic investments such as infrastructure and clean energy, in addition to fulfilling a pledge to expand the Child Tax Credit. “The big question for Democrats, then, is whether they can find enough offsets to keep their deficit pledges and fund other goals — or if extending Trump’s cuts will simply eat up the rest of their agenda,” Semafor’s Joseph Zeballos-Roig and Jordan Weissmann [write](. The big battle ahead: No matter who wins the election this fall, the expiration of large parts of the 2017 tax law will give policymakers a major opportunity to rewrite much of the U.S. tax code next year. U.S. Chamber of Commerce Executive Vice President Neil Bradley told Semafor that it could be “the Super Bowl of tax and economic policy.” --------------------------------------------------------------- Send your feedback to yrosenberg@thefiscaltimes.com. --------------------------------------------------------------- Fiscal News Roundup - [Supreme Court Upholds CFPB Funding, Saving Agency]( – Politico - [US Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Finance Watchdog Agency's Funding Mechanism]( – Reuters - [House Votes to Force Weapons Shipments to Israel, Rebuking Biden]( – Reuters - [Trump and Biden Are Competing to Quarterback the Super Bowl of Tax Policy]( – Semafor - [Billionaires Jamie Dimon and Ray Dalio Sound the Alarm on Soaring US Government Debt]( – CNN - [The Pentagon's Growing Costly Headache: Cheap Drones]( – Axios - [How Much Money the U.S. Spends on War]( – CNBC (video) - [Bernanke and Blanchard Say Central Banks Need Cooler Job Markets]( – Bloomberg - [In About-Face, Wall Street’s Big Donors Warm to Trump]( – New York Times - [At Least 9 GOP Lawmakers Are at Trump Trial, Which Could Be a Problem for Republicans]( – The Hill - [Pence Secures Taxpayer Funds for His Defunct White House Campaign]( – CNN - [Republican Chair Investigating Chamber of Commerce in Seismic K Street Shift]( – The Hill - [Senior-Care Referral Site ‘A Place for Mom’ Stays Mum on Neglect]( – Washington Post - [Three-Quarters of Texans Think ‘Extreme Conservative Agenda’ Has Captured State, Poll Finds]( – The Hill Views and Analysis - [Are Billionaire Taxes Falling? That Depends on Who You Think Pays Corporate Taxes]( – Howard Gleckman, Tax Policy Center - [The Supreme Court Just Handed Another Loss to Congress]( – Stephen L. Carter, Bloomberg - [Sorry Inflation Doomers, We're Heading in the Right Direction]( – Jonathan Levin, Bloomberg - [Is Disinflation Back on Track?]( – Paul Krugman, New York Times - [We Should Plug the Safety Net’s Biggest Hole]( – Robert Greenstein, The Hill - [The Implications of the Public’s Preexisting Condition—Amnesia]( – Larry Levitt, JAMA Forum - [Cooler Inflation Tells Fed That Rates Are High Enough]( – Bloomberg Opinion Editorial Board - [Why Auto Insurance Rates Are Out of Control]( – David Dayen, American Prospect - [Mike Johnson Was on the Ropes. Now He’s One of the Most Effective Speakers Ever]( – Marc A. Thiessen, Washington Post - [How the Federal Government Can Save Money by Following a To-Do List]( – Eric Yoder, Washington Post - [How Republicans Undercut Their Own Pro-Police Message]( – Arthur Delaney, HuffPost - [Our Underappreciated Care Workforce Is Getting a Boost but Deserves More]( – April Verrett, The Hill Copyright © 2024 The Fiscal Times, All rights reserved. You are receiving this newsletter because you subscribed at our website or through Facebook. The Fiscal Times, 399 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States Want to change how you receive these emails? [Update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe](