+ beware of nitazenes US Edition - Today's top story: Navalny dies in prison, authorities say â but his blueprint for anti-Putin activism will live on [View in browser]( US Edition | 17 February 2024 [The Conversation]
[The Conversation]( Those who cross swords with Vladimir Putin have a nasty tendency to die before their time. And to many, Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny was on borrowed time, especially after he returned to Russia in 2021 from Germany â where he had been recuperating after being poisoned with a nerve agent. Nonetheless, Navalnyâs apparent death came as a blow to pro-democracy campaigners the world over. For over a decade, Navalny tried to push back the tide of authoritarianism in Russia. The fact that he died weeks before Putin is reelected as president â and the fact that we can say that Putin will be reelected â suggests that he failed. But todayâs article by Indiana University political scientist Regina Smyth suggests that [isnât entirely the right way]( to see things. âNavalny understood that opposition in Russia was about exposing the corruption in Putinâs party; shining a light on electoral manipulation; and alerting the world to growing political violence,â she writes. âNavalny highlighted the very real opposition to Putin and authoritarian rule that exists in Russia despite attempts to hide it from the world.â And in that, he succeeded. This week we also liked articles about [electric vehicles](, [race cars without drivers](, and tips for people who are [factoring climate change into their family planning]( . [ [Get a global perspective on the news, with the best of The Conversationâs journalism from around the world, twice weekly.]( ] Matt Williams Senior International Editor
The legacy of Alexei Navalny lives on. Ian Langsdon/AFP via Getty Images
[Navalny dies in prison, authorities say â but his blueprint for anti-Putin activism will live on]( Regina Smyth, Indiana University Alexei Navalny, a persistent thorn in the side of Russian President Vladimir Putin, died on Feb. 16, 2024, in prison, authorities said.
Protecting the planet for future children might mean having fewer children. Halfpoint/iStock via Getty Images Plus
[Children are expensive â not just for parents, but the environment â so how many is too many?]( Trevor Hedberg, University of Arizona You can donate to environmental charities and even purchase carbon offsets, but not having an additional child typically has a much greater impact.
Everything old is new again. Simon Skafar/E+/Getty Images
[Electric vehicles are suddenly hot â but the industry has traveled a long road to relevance]( Hovig Tchalian, University of Southern California This seemingly cutting-edge technology isnât entirely new to our century. -
[Nitazenes are a powerful class of street drugs emerging across the US]( Christopher P. Holstege, University of Virginia An overdose death in Boulder County, Colorado, was linked to a powerful new formulation of a designer drug never approved for use in humans. -
[Bringing AI up to speed â autonomous auto racing promises safer driverless cars on the road]( Madhur Behl, University of Virginia Artificial intelligence systems that can handle the pressure of high-speed auto racing could lead to driverless vehicles that can safely manage the morning commute. -
[Gold, silver and lithium mining on federal land doesnât bring in any royalties to the US Treasury â because of an 1872 law]( Sam Kalen, University of Wyoming Hard rock minerals like gold, silver, copper and lithium on public lands belong to the American public, but under a 150-year-old law, the US gives them away for free. -
[âIt is hijacking my brainâ â a team of experts found ways to help young people addicted to social media to cut the craving]( -
[Candidatesâ aging brains are factors in the presidential race â 4 essential reads]( -
[Bacteria in your gut can improve your mood â new research in mice tries to zero in on the crucial strains]( -
[Immigrants do work that might not otherwise get done â bolstering the US economy]( -
[Forest Service warns of budget cuts ahead of a risky wildfire season â what that means for safety]( -
[A Bronx school district offers lessons in boosting student mental health]( -
[Why is free time still so elusive?]( -
[Mayorkas impeached: Is Congress on a witch hunt? 5 ways to judge whether oversight is legitimate or politicized]( -
[Why having human remains land on the Moon poses difficult questions for members of several religions]( -
[Can anyone make a citizenâs arrest? The history and legalities of catching criminals yourself]( The Conversation Quiz ð§ -
[The Conversation U.S. weekly news quiz]( Fritz Holznagel, The Conversation Hereâs the first question of [this weekâs edition:]( A new report from The Conversation's investigative unit shows that what factor is draining money from public schools at an alarming rate? - A. Tax breaks for businesses
- B. Love notes
- C. Fortunes
- D. Grocery coupons [Test your knowledge]( -
-
More of The Conversation Like this newsletter? You might be interested in our weekly and biweekly emails:
⢠[Weekly Highlights]( ⢠[Science Editors' Picks](
⢠[This Week in Religion]( ⢠[Politics Weekly](
⢠[Global Perspectives]( ⢠[Global Economy & Business]( Follow us on social media:
⢠[Threads]( ⢠[Bluesky](
⢠[Mastodon]( ⢠[Post.news](
⢠[LinkedIn]( ⢠[Instagram](
⢠[Facebook]( ⢠Or [get a daily text from us]( -
-
About The Conversation We're a nonprofit news organization dedicated to [helping academic experts share ideas with the public](. We can give away our articles thanks to the help of foundations, universities and readers like you. [Donate now to support research-based journalism]( [The Conversation]( Youâre receiving this newsletter from [The Conversation]( 303 Wyman Street, Suite 300 Waltham, MA 02451 [Forward to a friend]( • [Unsubscribe](