Newsletter Subject

Solid information − not polls, vibes or weasel words

From

theconversation.com

Email Address

us-donations@theconversation.com

Sent On

Thu, Sep 12, 2024 04:57 PM

Email Preheader Text

We exist to give you evidence, facts and the truth No images? Dear Reader, I hope you?ve read our

We exist to give you evidence, facts and the truth No images? [Click here]( [We need you now to meet our goal. Join us with a donation today: ( Dear Reader, I hope you’ve read our coverage of this week’s presidential debate. As is our custom, we asked scholars – in this case, one an expert on race, the other an expert on debates – to each write a 400-word analysis of what they saw and heard. The goal: to provide you with a deeper level of understanding than your average news story. That is what we aim to do every day here with The Conversation’s politics coverage: to use the unparalleled access we have to academics to produce deeply researched analysis of the news – on a deadline. But there’s more to our coverage than that. I recently sent a list to my colleagues here at The Conversation of clichés and what I call “weasel words” commonly used in campaign reporting. You know, words like “punted” and “pivoted,” two euphemisms used when a candidate doesn’t want to answer a question: “Candidate Mary Smith punted when asked whether she supported cutting Social Security, and pivoted to the threat she said her opponent represented.” We avoid that kind of euphemizing in our election coverage, where candidate Mary Smith would have “refused to answer the question and changed the subject.” The British writer George Orwell is my hero and inspiration when I think about covering politics. In his great essay “Politics and the English Language,” he wrote, “Political language … is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” What we give you at The Conversation is the opposite of pure wind. Our election coverage doesn’t focus on presidential polls, which really aren’t news at all – they’re just tabulations of what some people say they might do. Nothing has actually happened. We don’t tell you what a candidate should say, or must do, to gain advantage. That’s not news, either. Instead, we give you solid information to help you evaluate the candidates and the issues on the ballot. Right now, we’re in the process of editing and publishing stories looking at the records of the presidential candidates on everything from health care to LGBTQ rights, immigration and labor issues. Journalism doesn’t get more concrete than that. Orwell argues against the use of overused metaphors and similes not just because they obscure meaning. He says, “If one gets rid of these habits one can think more clearly, and to think clearly is a necessary first step toward political regeneration.” You could say the same spirit animates our politics coverage – the desire to present you with clear thinking. To us, that’s the necessary first step toward a political culture revitalized by facts, which themselves then lead to informed judgments. I hope you will support us on what is, really, this noble mission – which Orwell would probably just have us call “a good idea.” This good idea is made possible by the support of readers like you. So please help out as we launch our weeklong September drive today. While we welcome [a one-time gift in any amount](, your monthly support will be especially helpful to get us through Election Day and beyond. [Donate $5/month]( [Donate $10/month]( [Donate $20/month]( Our politics desk has been working intensively and will continue to do so well past Election Day so that you have truth, verified history and thoughtful analysis on your side as you navigate what lies ahead. With thanks, Naomi Schalit Senior Politics and Democracy Editor The Conversation U.S. [Donate to The Conversation]( [Share]( [Share]( [Forward]( You’re receiving this email as a previous donor or newsletter subscriber to The Conversation U.S. Clicking the Unsubscribe link will cancel your newsletter subscription. If you would like to not receive these emails, please [respond to this email](mailto:us-donations@theconversation.com) and ask us to take you off the list. You would, however, also miss our invites to donor events, impact reports and other exciting updates. The Conversation U.S. 303 Wyman Street, Suite 300 Waltham, MA 02451 USA [Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from theconversation.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

05/11/2024

Sent On

31/10/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.