Newsletter Subject

‘Suspicious transactions’ behind a Singapore investment platform

From

techinasia.com

Email Address

newsletter@techinasia.com

Sent On

Tue, Jan 5, 2021 01:04 AM

Email Preheader Text

Given the stunning revelations that were uncovered, this was a story that simply couldn’t wait.

Given the stunning revelations that were uncovered, this was a story that simply couldn’t wait. [Read from your browser]( Editor's Letter Dear {NAME} Happy new year! I was aiming to have a relaxing holiday weekend, but life can throw curveballs sometimes. For hundreds of investors in lending platform CoAssets, the news they received was devastating - they stand to lose all the money they’ve sunk into the company. Some put in their life savings while others sold their houses to invest. ([Read the story here.]( Police reports have been filed. Appeals to the Singapore Prime Minister have been made. Tech in Asia got wind of the story about two days before Christmas. Then I went to work speaking to sources and collecting evidence. I spent the weekend writing and rewriting the story, and then attended a three-hour-long powwow among investors of CoAssets on December 28. Finally, I woke up at 4.30 am the next day to make some final edits, just in time for publication four hours later. Given the stunning revelations that were uncovered, this was a story that simply couldn’t wait. This development got me thinking: Can media companies like Tech in Asia and the startup community as a whole do more to prevent such heartbreaking fiascos in the first place? It’s not the first time we’ve covered such a tragedy - the Honestbee debacle is another good example. What if journalists had been more critical of such companies even when things looked peachy on the surface? Would that have prevented a bad situation from getting worse? It’s easier said than done. As journalists, we can only publish something if there are adequate sources and credible evidence, and people are hesitant to speak up against a company when things appear to be going well. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, especially if we’re talking about potentially fraudulent behavior. Those who make their voices heard can meet a lot of resistance too, and it can feel like a lonely road. Even Lawrence Lim, the former chief operating officer of CoAssets, experienced this when he warned investors about the firm early on. “Not many people believed in me,” he recalls. That said, asking tough questions - even of companies that seem exceptional - is something that we want to continue doing and get better at. That’s our commitment for 2021. In the meantime, I’d liken business journalists to pathologists. The difference is that we don’t examine and scrutinize bodies and corpses, but troubled or dying companies instead. For many CoAssets investors, it may be too late to recoup their money. But I take some comfort in the hope that our stories will help prevent future mistakes from being made. Perhaps all this is just an inevitable result of a popped bubble. If so, the good news is that surviving startups have emerged stronger as a result. As for me, I’ll be taking a couple days off this week, and then it’s full steam ahead. Our journalism won’t be possible without our supporters. [Do subscribe to keep us going.]( Regards, Terence Editor-in-Chief P.S. Don't miss out on the biggest tech news and analysis. Add newsletter@techinasia.com to your address book, contacts, or safe sender list. Or simply move us into your inbox. Was this forwarded to you? You can read this every day when you sign up [here](. Don't want to receive these emails anymore? [Unsubscribe](. --------------------------------------------------------------- Tech in Asia’s newsletters are handcrafted daily with love - and sometimes powered by good kopi. Copyright © 2021 Tech in Asia, All rights reserved. 51 Bras Basah Rd, #05-5061, Singapore 189554

Marketing emails from techinasia.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

09/11/2024

Sent On

03/11/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Sent On

28/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.