Newsletter Subject

Is Snapchat's hardware solely spectacle? The TechCrunch Sunday Snapshot

From

techcrunch.com

Email Address

newsletter@techcrunch.com

Sent On

Sun, Sep 25, 2016 04:11 PM

Email Preheader Text

THE DAILY CRUNCH SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 25 2016 By Darrell Etherington Sunday Snapshot 09/25/16 Surprise

THE DAILY CRUNCH SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 25 2016 By Darrell Etherington Sunday Snapshot 09/25/16 Surprise and spectacle: Snapchat has a long track record of making moves that confuse and even frustrate observers and pundits. At first, many argued it was an app designed only for bad behavior, and dismissed it as little more than a short-term phenomenon with a faintly shady vibe since its user base skewed younger. Even now, while its popularity and ephemeral appeal are generally accepted as due to more than just an interest in sexting, critics of the app still find its UI and UX decisions baffling. And yet, Snapchat has managed to continue to expand its appeal and grow its user base. It does so with acquisitions and feature introductions that seem, initially, bizarre – its live video facial manipulation features initially struck many as creepy. And [acquisitions like Bitmoji] struck a chord with users in a big way, even if the app's goofy emoji creation mechanic seemed like a better for fit for soccer moms on Facebook than for Snapchat's millennial milieu. Snapchat's latest act might be its most controversial move yet; it's actually not even Snapchat anymore, as the company has rebranded as "camera"-focused Snap, Inc., and debuted its first hardware, Snapchat Spectacles. The device is a $130 pair of sunglasses with an embedded video camera that can take 10 second video for sharing via Snapchat, without requiring you to take our your phone. The sunglasses shoot circular video, too, which makes it easy to view cropped in either portrait or landscape orientation on your mobile device. My gut reaction to Spectacles, upon seeing them adorning Spiegel's face in brooding black and white as [shot by Karl Lagerfeld for the Wall Street Journal](yes that's all real), was that this was a foolhardy endeavor. It seemed likely to rehash all the complaints people had about Google Glass, but with a company even more unfamiliar with actually building great hardware. Plus, it actually focuses on one of the things about Google Glass that unnerved people most – its always-available camera. But history, as detailed above, has shown that it's never wise to take a Snapchat product decisions at face value, or to trust that instinct derived from years of observing other tech companies will apply to Spiegel et al. Snap's clearly betting big on Spectacles beyond the expiry of this initial spectacle – a new company name, and moving Snapchat's status to simply it's flagship product proves that. I still wouldn't go so far to say Spectacles will be a definite success, but Snap's oddball history means it'd be foolish not to be open to the possibility. [Get more stories at techcrunch.com ] Newest Jobs From CrunchBoard: - [VBScript or JavaScript Expert at C+R Research (Chicago, IL)] - [Social Advertising Analyst at UncommonGoods (Brooklyn, NY, United States)] - [Senior Software Engineer at Glassbreakers (Oakland, CA, United States)] - [Web/LAMP Developer - Integration, e-commerce at Sunrise Integration (Los Angeles, CA, United States)] - [Web/LAMP Developer - API Integration, e-commerce at Web Development Company (Los Angeles, CA, United States)] [SEE MORE JOBS ON CRUNCHBOARD] [Post your tech jobs] and reach millions of TechCrunch readers for only $200 per month [Facebook]  [Twitter]  [Youtube]  [Instagram]  [Flipboard] [View this email online in your browser] If you do not want to receive this email or you would like to update your preferences [click here]. 410 Townsend Street, San Francisco, CA 94107 © 2016 AOL Inc. All rights reserved.   [Privacy Policy]   [Terms of Service]                                                            

Marketing emails from techcrunch.com

View More
Sent On

05/06/2024

Sent On

04/06/2024

Sent On

03/06/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.