Newsletter Subject

Next Wave: There was nothing special about raising $5 billion

From

techcabal.com

Email Address

newsletter@techcabal.com

Sent On

Sun, Sep 11, 2022 04:50 PM

Email Preheader Text

Raising $5 billion in 2021 did not change the game enough for African startups. which is one of the

Raising $5 billion in 2021 did not change the game enough for African startups. [Read the newsletter in your browser.](=.moqxgzCNOypVwxdEZfN9d2DHymF3k-4urwyZV3ond3g) [TC Daily Logo] 11th September 2022 There was nothing special about raising $5 billion Photo by planimetrica/Unsplash Global venture funding in 2021 shattered all records. According to Crunchbase, total dollars invested in tech and tech adjacent startups by venture capitalists reached $643 billion in 2021, compared to $335 billion for 2020—a stunning 92% growth year over year. If you take Partech’s [data,](=.0Kqjgpw7tOgT4mZltH-m-jteyNYOhs5thUGRVBnvjbA) which is one of the most liberal interpretations of startup funding in Africa, African startups raised $5.2 billion in 2021. That is 0.8% of all venture dollars. If you go by data from Africa: The Big Deal, one of the most cited deal trackers in Africa, it’s even lower. For comparison, investors poured [$14 billion](=.ildE5VDUxdFnyJ_px9DCfR2BKqGJUXuo0QrRrFq60TU) into startups in Latin America, and tech companies in southeast Asia raised a record $25.7 billion in funding. Five billion dollars was indeed better than what was, but it’s still worth noting that Africa’s breakout year was little more than a rounding error in the world of global venture. It is sobering, and I believe more sobriety is not a bad idea for all stakeholders in Africa’s technology space. To be fair, these other tech ecosystems are far more developed, mature, and integrated compared to Africa. And this is not to mention the fact that they enjoy far better infrastructure, policy mechanisms, and robust economies. But this is still not a sufficient excuse. 2021 was an outlier globally. Chart by Boluwatife Sanwo – TechCabal Insights This much is clear: Last year’s record funding inflow was a sign that “Africa’s time had come” or any of the idyllic notions that excited innovators, investors and unfortunately some rent-seekers who occupy public offices. That record $5 billion was a seed. The largest of the pitiful handfuls since investors started paying attention, yes, but a seed nonetheless. It was also not close to being enough to meet the capital requirements that African innovation needs. The downturn finally bites Despite the fact that last year’s record funding was just a seed, a harvest mentality began to grow alongside the increase in deal activity and funding amounts in both innovators and governments. Harvesting is not a bad thing. It is part of the natural cycle. However, what is important is understanding that harvests are at the end of the life cycle of the agricultural ecosystem—at least on the farm. Premature harvest thinking leads to unhealthy behaviour that is disconnected from the surrounding environment. For Africa that surrounding environment is both economical, social, and the Western apron strings to which a significant amount of Africa’s venture funding, especially growth, funding is tied. Feasting on seeds is not illegal, but a farmer who does so won’t be in business in the near future. And the entire African technology landscape is barely seeded. To be a bit more explicit, anyone—innovators, investors and even talent—who is building with a quick-flip mindset and looking to make a quick buck is not only in the wrong business, they are doing an entire ecosystem a disservice. Nothing makes this clearer than tough times, and in Africa, where tough is the default, it seems like tougher times are catching up to innovation. What do you call it when tough times catch up with innovation? Today where innovation is synonymous with Silicon Valley-esque software businesses, you would call it a venture downturn. According to Africa: The Big Deal, venture funding in Africa in July and August fell by [20% and 67%](=.R2xRH4ng0w_zh4fC64Sy3YlEV_4_blZatOoUXqa8yQQ) compared to last year’s amounts, despite more deals being recorded. The downturn bites. Chart by Africa: The Big Deal In general, data on fundraising globally lags, but in Africa that lag is more pronounced. For some, it was already clear by June at least that fewer deals were being completed compared to last year. While it took a while for the money numbers to show up in venture funding trackers, other signs of the growing pain were there. The silent down rounds and an increase in merger and acquisition activity were one sign. Layoffs were another sign. And without the PR garb of new venture funding rounds to provide cover, internal governance issues began to show up in the media and flawed business models (Kune, anyone?) began to break under the strain. But the venture pain is only starting. Multiple macro crises are rapidly catching up with African innovation. Switching off the harvest hormone means burrowing deeper to find true depth for your seedlings. This means understanding social consumption habits, eventual obtainable market sizes and the realities of expansion. It also means deepening founder talent beyond who-you-know-isms, better middle management and curious investors at all stages. We'd love to hear from you Thanks for reading The Next Wave. Subscribe [here](=.p2xQ0VqM1lrujXdJlXu8rzrqBn0JBEmj0HvPauq_Hvw) for free to get fresh perspectives on the progress of digital innovation in Africa every Sunday. Please share today’s edition with your network on WhatsApp, Telegram and other platforms, and feel free to send a reply to let us know if you enjoyed this essay [Subscribe to our TC Daily newsletter](=.xCLpvln7jMCm-FiC0HPSjPzrIuOyKlhw7zyczUjFjvo) to receive all the technology and business stories you need each weekday at 7 AM (WAT). Follow TechCabal on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay engaged in our real-time conversations on tech and innovation in Africa. Abraham Augustine, Senior Writer, TechCabal. Share with your network =.IjwGAT-rKuISzguvEGdEzYzjyl6DBQc6KApagH7fNhc =.RurzO9T27xsS5DLmMk-BrYzQxrd9K_2MPFJsEp2FIoA =.x1QDEp8_bpptqtjQZbIMA7kDSygOr8eUIdXhryen8oM =.kcr5YsAqRntqZVf3Vb72UeX-i5gsVytcTma9iVESJAI =.zprvso-mLuWblHdxGKuO8JPM50HCpGbhPxra10CRkog # # # # # 18, Nnobi Street, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria [View in Map](#) You received this email because you signed up on our website or made purchase from us.If you know longer wish to recieve these emails, please [unsubscribe](=.QIhZxcOMTkrsOeEvQonfENWyvKTRvpUXxqn3Z7QR4fU)

Marketing emails from techcabal.com

View More
Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

04/11/2024

Sent On

01/11/2024

Sent On

31/10/2024

Sent On

28/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.