Newsletter Subject

CBO Was Not 'Way Off' On ACA Score, King Won't Back Down From Tweet And This Article Won't Change Your Mind

From

talkingpointsmemo.com

Email Address

Talk@talkingpointsmemo.com

Sent On

Mon, Mar 13, 2017 02:38 PM

Email Preheader Text

March 13, 2017 Top Stories --------------------------------------------------------------- The Gist:

March 13, 2017 Top Stories --------------------------------------------------------------- [No, The CBO Was Not 'Way, Way Off' On Scoring Obamacare]( The Gist: Aiming to erode public trust in the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office ahead of its report this week expected to show that the GOP's Obamacare repeal bill will cause millions of people to lose their health insurance, Republican lawmakers and Trump administration officials are rewriting the history of the CBO's analysis of the Affordable Care Act. [Steve King Won't Back Down From His Tweet About 'Somebody Else's Babies']( The Gist: Rep. Steve King (R-IA) on Monday morning doubled down on his Sunday tweet saying that "civilization" will not be restored with "somebody else's babies." [Preet Bharara Compares His Firing To Disbanding Of Public Corruption Panel]( The Gist: After he confirmed on Saturday that he had been fired as the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Preet Bharara published a tweet Sunday referencing a short-lived New York state panel tasked with investigating public corruption." From The Reporter's Notebook --------------------------------------------------------------- Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price said on Sunday that he believes "nobody will be worse off financially" under the Republican bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act, and dismissed a report that millions will lose coverage if it passes, TPM's Esme Cribb [reported](. "I firmly believe that nobody will be worse off financially in the process that we’re going through," Price told Chuck Todd on NBC News' "Meet the Press." Agree or Disagree? --------------------------------------------------------------- Josh Marshall: "The real oddity with Bharara is not that his tenure is any more sacrosanct than any of the other 45. It's why Trump would have taken the highly conspicuous and odd step of retaining him only to turn around and fire him. It could be as simple as the fact that there's little consistency to anything Trump does (sufficient explanation). [It could be that Steve Bannon or Jeff Sessions had other ideas]( and Trump's initial decision was more impulsive than strategic (sufficient explanation). Or it could be something darker and more corrupt. We do not know." Say What?! --------------------------------------------------------------- "I can't answer that question. It's up to people. People are going to do what they want to do with their lives." - House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) said on Sunday that he can't say how many people will lose health coverage under the Republican bill to [repeal the Affordable Care Act, as it's 'up to people' to acquire coverage 'if they want it.]( BUZZING: Today in the Hive --------------------------------------------------------------- From a TPM Prime member: "I'm sorry, but I don't think you can lose an election, even on a technicality, to Donald Friggin' Trump and not be flawed. Now, I happen to big a big fan and I'm not embarrassed to have voted for her or supported her. I make no apologies. I like Bernie, too. I was proud to be a Democrat when Hillary and Bernie fought the primary largely on the high ground while the Republicans put on a circus. Now it may well be that the flaw in our candidate is that she was unprepared for the move into the big top atmosphere that Trump managed to create around the entire campaign. It's funny, people kept waiting for Trump to "act presidential" during the campaign but it seems like, looking back, if he had tried that he'd have lost badly. We ran a very good candidate for president in a climate where there was no reward for being the kind of serious candidate and policymaker that Hillary is. Right candidate, wrong time. I don't see how Bernie would have done any better, though." Related: Hillary Clinton Tweets Support [For Women's March On Washington]( Have something to add? Become a [Prime]( member and join the discussion [here](. What We're Reading --------------------------------------------------------------- This Article Won’t Change Your Mind ([The Atlantic]( How the Maker of TurboTax Fought Free, Simple Tax Filing ([ProPublica]( [unsubscribe from this list]( | [update subscription preferences]( | [view email in browser](

Marketing emails from talkingpointsmemo.com

View More
Sent On

16/03/2018

Sent On

15/03/2018

Sent On

14/03/2018

Sent On

13/03/2018

Sent On

12/03/2018

Sent On

08/03/2018

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.