Newsletter Subject

The Straight Dope: What’s the worst outcome in the net-neutrality debate?

From

suntimesmail.com

Email Address

reply@suntimesmail.com

Sent On

Fri, Aug 18, 2017 08:01 AM

Email Preheader Text

08/18/2017 Dear Cecil: There seem to be two major concerns with a lack of net neutrality: pricing an

[View this message as a web page]( [The Straight Dope]( 08/18/2017 Dear Cecil: There seem to be two major concerns with a lack of net neutrality: pricing (want to browse ESPN.com? That’s another five bucks a month) and content (would internet service providers refuse to transmit certain sites?). How bad could it really get? — Bryan Thurn, Jacksonville Cecil replies: Great news: the genuine worst-case scenario you’re wondering about is finally starting to come into focus. It’s about time. The debate about net neutrality is only a decade old, but feels like it’s been going on forever — probably because it’s existed mostly within the realm of the hypothetical: what might happen if this happens, what might not happen if that does. At long last we have something concretely terrible to worry about. For more, see: [( STRAIGHT DOPE STAFF REPORT — 08/02/1999 Dear Straight Dope: The idea that the FARTHER we are able to see into the universe, the YOUNGER the objects we see, seems paradoxical because if we could see FAR ENOUGH, we would see the beginning of the universe; and since the Big Bang holds that it all started from a single point, the objects we see would not be far away at all, but RIGHT ON TOP OF US. What gives? — Tom.McAfee@sterinfo.com SDStaff Ian replies: I can see why Cecil decided to let the Straight Dope Science Advisory Board have a crack at this one. It's such a softball. Let's deal with the last part of the question first. For more, see: [( STRAIGHT DOPE CLASSIC — 10/29/2004 Dear Cecil: So I guess everyone's agreed that John Kerry personally blew away a VC in 'Nam 35 years ago. My question is, have we ever had a killer for president? I'm not talking about generals like Grant and Eisenhower, who were indirectly responsible for the deaths of thousands of Confederates and Germans, or combatants using long-distance weapons like a Kennedy torpedo or a Bush Sr. bomb. I'm wondering about somebody getting whacked face to face, mano a mano, up close and personal, with a gun, knife, club, or pointy stick. Washington in the French and Indian War? Garfield in the Civil War? Didn't Andy Jackson fight a duel or two? — Gavin Anderson, Salt Lake City Cecil replies: No offense, Gavin, but you sound like one of those guys who slows down to ogle car wrecks. However, now that you bring it up, the question does hold a certain grim fascination. Given the 250-year time span and the impossibility of counting undetected homicides, I don't claim the following list is complete. Still, I know of three U.S. presidents who killed people at close range, and one more accused of murder ... For more, see: [( YOUR AD HERE! Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks. For rates and details contact Rich at [rhummel@suntimes.com](. Copyright © 2017 Sun-Times Media, LLC. This email was sent by The Straight Dope, Sun-Times Media, LLC., 350 N. Orleans, 10th Floor, Chicago, IL 60654 [Unsubscribe/update preferences]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. To change or update your newsletter subscription preferences, or to unsubscribe from all Chicago Reader and Straight Dope newsletters and promotional communications, [click here](. Please allow 72 hours for this change to take effect.

Marketing emails from suntimesmail.com

View More
Sent On

13/12/2019

Sent On

06/12/2019

Sent On

30/11/2019

Sent On

22/11/2019

Sent On

15/11/2019

Sent On

08/11/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.