Newsletter Subject

Bayer again

From

sumofus.org

Email Address

us@sumofus.org

Sent On

Sat, Nov 5, 2016 11:33 AM

Email Preheader Text

Bayer and Syngenta's own research shows that neonic pesticides seriously harm bee colonies -- but th

Bayer and Syngenta's own research shows that neonic pesticides seriously harm bee colonies -- but they refused to release the studies. Tell the agro-chemical giants to stop suppressing research that could save the bees! [SumOfUs] {NAME}, The SumOfUs community has known for a long time that bee-killing pesticides are decimating pollinator populations. And it turns out that agro-chemical giants Syngenta and Bayer knew it too -- but kept it secret from the public. That’s right. Thanks to Freedom of Information Act requests, previously unpublished field trials commissioned by the two neonic manufacturers have been released showing that two neonic pesticides seriously harm bee colonies in high concentrations. The studies are particularly damning because they prove that neonics don’t just harm bees at the field level, but can harm the entire colony. Both Bayer and Syngenta have long minimized the clear impact neonic pesticides have on bees -- and now we know they knew it all along. [Tell Bayer and Syngenta to stop suppressing field data about bee-killing pesticides.] Just recently, Syngenta claimed that none of the field tests it commissioned found that the neonicotinoid thiamethoxam -- the very chemical in this study -- “damages the health of bee colonies.” Yet this newly uncovered study clearly suggests otherwise. This isn’t the first time that key research into the effects of neonics on pollinators has been suppressed. Earlier this year, under pressure from Agro-Chemical corporations, the USDA was accused of silencing concerns from its own scientists that neonics were devastating bee populations. This silence and suppression of science that could save the bees needs to end right now. Bayer and Syngenta need to prove to us they have nothing to hide with the safety of neonic pesticides. It shouldn’t take Freedom of Information requests to do that. The big chemical companies can’t have it both ways -- if the pesticides are as safe as they like to say they are, then it should be a no-brainer to release the field data. And if in fact there are deep concerns, the public deserves to know. [Enough suppressing field research. Demand that Syngenta and Bayer come clean about bee-killing neonics.] More than one third of the world’s supplies relies on pollinators. Here at SumOfUs we’ve been fighting tirelessly to make sure the destruction stops now, from supporting independent field research, to supporting the legal defense of scientists who’ve been muzzled, to showing up in person at Bayer’s doorstep. And last week, we helped raised vital funds to keep this campaign going. Together we're stopping the world's biggest companies in their tracks as they endanger the health of pollinators, our food supply, and our environment. Now, let’s make sure that Bayer and Syngenta can’t suppress science any longer. [Sign the petition to Bayer and Syngenta: come clean about bee-killing neonics now.] Thanks for all that you do, Nicole, Toni, Reem, and the rest of the SumOfUs team ********** More information: [Greenpeace Investigation Uncovers Studies Showing Pesticides Pose Serious Harm to Honeybees,] EcoWatch, Sept 22, 2016 [Pesticide manufacturers' own tests reveal serious harm to honeybees,] The Guardian, Sept 22, 2016 --------------------------------------------------------------- SumOfUs is a worldwide movement of people like you, working together to hold corporations accountable for their actions and forge a new, sustainable path for our global economy. Please help keep SumOfUs strong by chipping in $3 or become a SumOfUs core member with a regular monthly donation. [Set up a monthly donation] [Chip in $3 instead] This email was sent to {EMAIL}. | [Unsubscribe]

Marketing emails from sumofus.org

View More
Sent On

31/10/2023

Sent On

10/10/2023

Sent On

30/04/2023

Sent On

20/04/2023

Sent On

05/02/2023

Sent On

03/02/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.