Newsletter Subject

America’s Cultural “Race-to-the-Bottom”

From

substack.com

Email Address

culturcidal@substack.com

Sent On

Fri, Jun 9, 2023 04:03 PM

Email Preheader Text

Social media is a societal anchor

Social media is a societal anchor                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 [Open in app]( or [online]() [America’s Cultural “Race-to-the-Bottom”]( Social media is a societal anchor [John Hawkins]( Jun 9   [Share](   On occasion, you’ll run across someone saying something that makes you think. These tweets from Wilfred X. Reilly? They fit the bill. Barbara Oakley has talked about that concept before from a slightly different angle. She called it, “pathological altruism.” She said this about it in [an interview I did with her back in 2011]( People normally think of altruism as something that benefits someone else, maybe at some cost to yourself. But pathological altruism is altruism that you may think is benefitting someone else, but it doesn’t benefit him. In fact, it can make the situation even worse and not just for the person you’re trying to help, but even for yourself. I had a student in one of my classes on pathological altruism and she was just not doing very well. Finally, one day, I got a note from her and it said, “I can’t be in class today. My brother tried to commit suicide.” I took a risk, wrote a note, and said, “Maybe you want to apply some of the ideas from this class and set some emotional boundaries because you think you’re reaching out to try and help your brother, but it doesn’t look like that’s happening. Instead, it’s hurting you.” She told me, “That changed my life.” She had indeed become very depressed herself. She was planning on dropping out of school and so this helped her take a step back and start realizing that, no, she wasn’t really helping her brother. I think sometimes people hear this and they have a knee-jerk reaction, “You can’t say this, and they get very upset.” I think they really get upset because if everybody knew this kind of thing, they wouldn’t be able to manipulate them quite as easily. Of course, pathological altruism was certainly a thing back then, but since then, it has become one of the defining hallmarks of modern liberalism. The incredibly destructive “help” the Left provides to people erodes society while often hurting the people they’re supposedly aiding. How many people are there that have been recruited into the trans lifestyle that later killed themselves? Is it really compassionate to do everything possible to make it easier for homeless people to live on the streets and get access to drugs? Does creating a world where petty criminals feel like they can break the law and disrespect the police at will, help them straighten out or help lock them into a life of crime? Is overhyping the tiny number of black Americans killed by police good for black Americans or has it just led to more crime in black communities? Does telling black Americans that they are victims make life better for them or does it encourage black and white Americans to be at each other’s throats? This incessant drive to destroy all standards of behavior to excuse groups liberals like is doing tremendous damage to our society, including to the people they’re ostensibly trying to “help.” Of course, [influencer culture]( has also been much more of a disaster than most people realize. In a world where everyone is a brand competing for attention in a desperately overcrowded market, it leads to ever more outrageous comments, tactics, attacks, and attention grabs. Blasphemy, getting naked, making up conspiracy theories, and drumming up bitter personal feuds that turn friends into ex-friends are all just considered “marketing” these days and no matter how far you go, someone will go further: The deeper people go into the gutter to get you to look at them, the more pressure there is on everyone else to figure out how to go even lower to get attention.  The general public hasn’t been exempt from this whole race to the bottom either. Believe it or not, fifteen years ago when social media was in its infancy, people were regularly having intelligent, intellectual conversations online with strangers if they wanted to. They were meeting new friends. People weren’t perpetually outraged or addicted, they just often found talking to strangers online to be PLEASANT. Online behavior was far from perfect, but it was several orders of magnitude healthier than it is today. What happened? Social media happened. Suddenly, instead of dealing with relatively small groups of people on forums who, even if they were [anonymous]( cared about their reputations in that place, the whole world was essentially invited to comment on every conversation. That was a godsend for every maladjusted troll, snarky teenage boy, sociopath, and foreign intelligence agent, but not so great for the rest of us. Every comment people made suddenly became a food fight. Person A says something. Twenty people tell him to go screw himself. Twenty more people insult those people. Twenty more people tell those people they deserve to die. Soon, hatred is being spewed everywhere and most of the people doing it feel justified because some anonymous random person on “the other side” said something horrible to them. The whole process ends up creating an angry, outraged, toxic cesspool that makes even non-anonymous people tribal and hostile while spiking engagement, which is why social media companies love it despite the damage it does to society. Meanwhile, many of the most bizarre cultural trends in our society like furries, MAPS, transsexuals, flat earthers, conspiracy theorists, and incels [are largely a product of basket cases, weirdos, and village idiots who were once isolated in wider society congregating online]( and convincing themselves that it’s actually the “normies” that are off base. Once these oddballs would have been surrounded by more normal people that may have helped them pull back from the brink, but good luck bringing them back to reality now when they spend all day on the Internet talking to other broken people who reinforce their warped beliefs. There are a variety of reasons why all of these factors are becoming so prevalent now, but one of the biggest is that there was a time not so long ago when people didn’t consider what happened online to be “the real world.” However today, when the average American spends a mind-blowing [8+ hours per day online]( what happens online is very much the “real world.” There are lots of wildly popular “online” celebrities. Trump’s tweeting was a core part of his election victory in 2016. “Real world” news is made on social media every day of the week. The more that toxic online world merges with the “real world,” the worse off our culture becomes. We can all see the degeneration in our culture, but the reality is that decline is a cultural choice. Is it too late to shake our country loose from this dysfunction? Theoretically, no. Practically? That’s harder to say because it would not only take a large cultural shift, it would also take a shift in the opposite direction. A shift towards what has worked before. Towards morality. Towards universal standards. It would mean that we would need to put what works and the good of the country ahead of virtue-signaling support for the latest supposed “victim group” in America. Yes, women would need to be put ahead of trans men. Taxpayers ahead of non-taxpayers. Sane people ahead of the insane. Police ahead of the criminals. Taxpayers ahead of the homeless. To turn it around, we’d need to prioritize becoming better and encouraging everyone to improve themselves, not coddling the people who are doing the wrong things in life and failing because of it. Our principles would need to start mattering again. We’d need to start copying success, not resenting it. We’d need to choose what has been proven to work over what sounds good. Facts would have to be ahead of feelings. How does this happen? It happens one person at a time. So, if you’re reading this, you’ve seen what would have to happen. Are you willing to commit to those ideas in your own life? If so and enough people in our society join you, we’ll start the long, hard cultural road back in the other direction. If not? Well, then we’ll have made our choice and will have to live with the consequences. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Upgrade to paid]( [Share]( [Leave a comment]( [101 Things All Young Adults Should Know](   [Like]( [Comment]( [Restack](   © 2023 John Hawkins 548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104 [Unsubscribe]() [Get the app]( writing]()

Marketing emails from substack.com

View More
Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.