Newsletter Subject

🎓 Don’t ask too many questions

From

substack.com

Email Address

ariyh@substack.com

Sent On

Tue, Jan 25, 2022 07:27 AM

Email Preheader Text

After 8 similar questions, people?s answers start to change and differ more from reality. More que

After 8 similar questions, people’s answers start to change and differ more from reality. More questions worsen rather than improve the quality of responses.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                [🎓 Don’t ask too many questions]( After 8 similar questions, people’s answers start to change and differ more from reality. More questions worsen rather than improve the quality of responses. [Thomas McKinlay]( Jan 25 [Comment]( [Share]( New to [Ariyh](? Join 8,123 evidence-based marketers for 3min practical insights 💡 from scientific research 🎓 to get better marketing results 📈 [Subscribe now]( Links: [Job board]( - [Advertise on Ariyh]( - [1:1 Consulting]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Today’s insight is brought to you by… [Campaign Monitor]( Email list churn is inevitable, but it doesn’t have to be the end of a consumer relationship. A well-crafted reactivation campaign can help you win back the attention of idle subscribers — and this post teaches you how to do exactly that. [Read the post]( --------------------------------------------------------------- 📝 Intro Surveying potential customers is key to understanding anything from what they think about your brand to how you can price your product (ideally, using [this new method](). We’ve even seen how [asking for feedback can increase customer spending]( - simply because you ask. But there are [many response biases]( we need to be aware of when asking people for their preferences or opinions, so we can get high quality results. For example, we know that the order in which questions are asked impacts how they will answer. This is why most good surveys randomize the order of most of their questions. Today we look at a new one that researchers just discovered. P.S.: Thank you [Antonia Krefeld-Schwalb](, one of the co-authors of this research, for resolving my doubts while I was summarizing this study. --------------------------------------------------------------- Previous insight: [When big discounts backfire]( (100+ more insights [here]() Don’t ask people more than 8 similar questions in a sequence Impacted metrics: Customer understanding Channels: Market research | Surveys For: Both B2C and B2B Research date: December 2021 📈 Recommendation When questioning people about their preferences (e.g. in a brand choice survey), try to not ask more than 8 similar questions. After that peak, the quality of answers decreases and differs more and more from actual preferences. 🎓 Findings - When people answer a series of similarly-structured questions, they start answering less accurately after a few questions. - These answers are less predictive of actual behavior than answers to initial questions (e.g. they’re less likely to give a true answer to “Would you buy X?”) - For example, in mouse and eye-tracking experiments, when people were asked a series of questions about which type of reward they would choose (e.g. $22 in 1 day or $29 in 23 days; $24 in 3 days or $33 in 34 days), they: - Showed much less effort in answering question 32 than they did in question 1 - Used simpler answering strategies the more questions they answered (e.g. simply choosing the larger amount, or the shortest delay) - The quality of answers peaked at between 5 and 8 questions. --------------------------------------------------------------- Hey! 👋 Are we connected on LinkedIn and Twitter? If not, join me here: - [Thomas McKinlay on LinkedIn]( - [@tdmckinlay on Twitter]( --------------------------------------------------------------- 🧠 Why it works - Say we are answering a survey about a series of competing products (e.g. how likely are you to buy Nivea 2 in 1 shampoo from 0 to 9?). - Initially, we tend to think broadly about the answer (e.g. ‘Hhmm, would I actually buy it at all? In what context? Summing that up would probably be a 7’) - But after a while of ‘properly’ thinking about each question, we adapt to the task of answering similar questions and look for ways to be more efficient. - To answer more efficiently, we think about our answers less, and instead come up with simplified methods (e.g. ‘I’ll just answer 2 if I don’t like the product, and 7 if I like it’). - Answers from these simplified methods tend to be further away from what we would actually do in reality, compared to when we ‘properly’ thought about the questions at the start (e.g. that ‘2’ would actually be a ‘4’ if answered at the beginning). ✋ Limitations - The study focused on online surveys. However, the psychological mechanism should apply in other contexts as well, such as in-person interviews to a series of similar questions. - The surveys tested in the study reached a maximum of only 32 questions. It’s likely that when there are more questions (e.g. hundreds, as in many studies) the effect becomes even stronger, as people switch to extremely simple answering strategies to get through it as fast as possible. - Proactive techniques should be able to reduce or delay this bias (e.g. changing the format of questions). However, this was not tested. 🏢 Companies using this - Companies normally keep their regular feedback surveys (e.g. product experience) quite short, to improve response rates. Importantly, series of similar questions are usually limited. - Market researchers and academics are more prone to fall into this trap. This means that the data they generate can be of lower quality than expected. ⚡ Steps to implement - If you can, limit the number of similar questions in a questionnaire or interview to 8. - If you must ask more than 8 similar questions, try to not group them together, break the questionnaire into different sections (e.g. using filler questions), and ask the questions in different ways (if possible without biasing results). --------------------------------------------------------------- 🔍 Study type Online experiments. United States 📖 Research Li, Y., Krefeld-Schwalb, A., Wall, D. G., Johnson, E. J., Toubia, O., & Bartels, D. M. (December 2021). The More You Ask, the Less You Get: When Additional Questions Hurt External Validity. Journal of Marketing Research. [[Link to paper](] 🏫 Affiliations School of Business, University of California Riverside; Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University; Carnegie Mellon University; and Booth School of Business, University of Chicago. United States Remember: This is a new scientific discovery. In the future it will probably be better understood and could even be proven wrong (that’s [how science works](). It may also not be generalizable to your situation. If it’s a risky change, always test it on a small scale before rolling it out widely. --------------------------------------------------------------- 🔥 Featured hand-picked jobs A selection of the best marketing opportunities out there. - Cat person - [Head of Growth]( (Remote, US or New York) - Modern Health - [Public Relations Manager]( (Remote) - HYPE - [Performance Marketing Lead]( (Remote) - Dapper Rhinos - [Growth Marketing Consultant]( (Rotterdam) - ColorElephant - [Product Marketing Manager]( (Remote) - Lean Labs - [Head of Growth Marketing]( (Remote) View other hand-picked marketing roles, or post your own, on[Ariyh’s Job Board](. --------------------------------------------------------------- Rate today’s insight to help me make Ariyh's next insights 🎓 even more useful 📈 How was today’s insight? [Loved it]( | [Great]( | [Good]( | [Meh]( | [Bad]( What else you can get out of Ariyh: - 🔥 Looking for a new job or hiring? See [Ariyh’s hand-picked job board]( - 📣 Want to advertise on Ariyh? [Here’s all you need to know]( - 📈 Want a quick boost to your business? Ask for 1:1 [personalized recommendations here]( New to Ariyh? -> Subscribe below or read other 3min marketing insights [here]( [Subscribe now]( [Like]( [[Comment]Comment]( [[Share]Share]( If you liked this post from [Ariyh](, why not share it? [Share]( © 2022 Thomas McKinlay [Unsubscribe]( 08007, Barcelona, Spain [Publish on Substack](

Marketing emails from substack.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.