Newsletter Subject

Two big trends that will change the world: Data and Decentralization

From

substack.com

Email Address

johnfurrier@substack.com

Sent On

Tue, Mar 23, 2021 12:29 AM

Email Preheader Text

What's next after cloud? Everyone wants to know and it's not what you expect.               

What's next after cloud? Everyone wants to know and it's not what you expect.                                                                                                                                                                                                        [Two big trends that will change the world: Data and Decentralization]( What's next after cloud? Everyone wants to know and it's not what you expect. [John Furrier]( Mar 23 [Comment]( [Share]( The next 10 years of cloud will differ dramatically from the past decade, in ways we couldn’t have imagined just a few years ago. The early days of cloud-deployed virtualization of standard off-the-shelf components to scale out and build a large distributed system. The coming decade will see a much more data-centric, real-time, intelligent, hyper-decentralized cloud that will comprise on-premises, hybrid, cross-cloud, and edge workloads. And it will have a services layer that abstracts away the complexity of the underlying infrastructure. In this analysis, we’ll summarize the findings of our recent event and extract the signal from our great guests with a series of comments and clips from the show. And we’ll share some of SiliconANGLE theCUBE market data and ETR survey content as well. After decades of cloud innovation, what’s next? The graphic below lays out our view of the phases of cloud and the progression of innovation over time, and how we see the coming decade. Cloud as novelty Cloud, like many innovations, started as a novelty. When Amazon.com Inc. announced S3 in March of 2006, nobody in the vendor and user communities really paid too much attention. Then later that year it announced EC2 and people started to think about a new model of computing. But it was largely tire kickers and bleeding-edge developers that took notice and leaned in. Cloud awakening The financial crisis of 2007 to 2009 really created a cloud awakening by putting a cloud on the radar of many chief financial officers. Shadow IT emerged within departments that wanted to take information technologies in bite-sized chunks as operating expenses. A decade of IT transformation Organizations began to see the benefits of the cloud in the form of the agility it brought and cost savings and value creation by re-directing the labor force. It catalyzed the DevOps movement and put developers at the center of IT transformation. Post-financial crisis, we’ve been on an 11-year cloud boom. Cloud has disrupted the on-premises model and completely transformed the way we deploy and manage technology. Deeper industry transformation is next The pandemic hit at the beginning of this decade and created a mandate to go digital. And it accelerated this industry transformation that we highlight here, which probably would have taken several more years to mature – but overnight the “forced march to digital” occurred and is here to stay. This next wave, we think, will be much more about business or industry transformation. We’re seeing the first glimpses of that. Holger Mueller of Constellation Research summed it up very well at our event. Paraphrasing from his discussion on theCUBE at the event, he said: The cloud is the big winner of COVID. Normally we talk about seven-year economic cycles for planning and investment. Now we operate in seven-day cycles. Do we open or close the store? How do pivot to support remote workers, without the burden of CAPEX? And we think that the focus areas listed on this chart are going to be front and center in the coming years. Data, AI, and a fully digitized and intelligent stack will support next-generation disruptions in autos, manufacturing, finance, farming, and virtually every industry. The distributed system will expand to the edge and the underlying infrastructure across physical locations will be abstracted. Many issues remain, not the least of which is latency, which we talked about at the event in quite some detail. The Big 3 clouds: The rich get richer The chart below shows our most recent estimates of infrastructure-as-a-service and platform-as-a-service spend for the Big 3 cloud vendors. We’ll update this data after the earnings season, but here are the key points: The combined force of the Big 3: The first point we want to make is that combined, the Big 3 — Amazon Web Services Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Google LLC — accounted for almost $80 billion in infrastructure spend last year. That $80 billion annual spend was not all incremental. No — it has caused consolidation in the on-prem data center business. Dell Technologies Inc., EMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., IBM Corp., Oracle Corp., and others have all felt the heat and have had to respond with hybrid strategies. Azure (and GCP) are closing the gap: It’s true that Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud Platform appear to be growing faster than AWS. We don’t know the exact numbers because only AWS provides a clean view of IaaS and PaaS, whereas Microsoft and Google hide the ball on their IaaS numbers because they’re behind AWS. But they do leave breadcrumbs and clues – and we have other means of estimating. But it’s undeniable that Azure is closing the revenue gap with a large revenue base and a growth rate that’s 20 percentage points higher than that of AWS. AWS continues to lead: However, despite the fact that Azure and Google are growing faster than AWS, AWS is the only company by our estimates to grow its business sequentially last quarter. In and of itself that’s not significant. What is significant is that because AWS is so large at now $45 billion annually, even at slower growth rates it grows much more in absolute terms than its competitors. We think AWS will keep its lead for some time. We think Microsoft and AWS will continue to lead the rest of the pack; and Google, with its balance sheet and global network, will play the long game. Virtually everyone else, with the exception of perhaps Alibaba, will be secondary participants in this cloud game. Sizing up the competition This graphic below underscores this reality and lays out the competitive landscape. What we’re showing above is survey data from ETR of more than 1,400 CIOs and IT buyers. On the vertical axis is Net Score, which measures spending momentum and on the horizontal axis is the so-called Market Share, which is a measure of pervasiveness in the data set. Here are the key points: Hyperscale leadership: AWS and Microsoft stand alone. They are so far ahead of the pack that they’d have to fall down to lose their lead. They both have high spending velocity and a large share of the market. We don’t think that will change. Google has the financial strength to continue to position itself as an alternative to AWS and as an analytics specialist. So it will continue to grow, but Google will be challenged to catch up to the leaders in our view given the momentum and customer base of both AWS and Azure. Hybrid becomes real: Now take a look at the hybrid zone – where the whole field is playing. These are companies that have a large on-prem presence and have been forced to initiate a coherent cloud strategy, including multi-cloud. This includes Google; because it’s behind, it has to take a differentiated approach relative to AWS. And you can see some real progress from the on-prem crowd. VMware Cloud on AWS stands out, as does Red Hat OpenShift, which is “cloudy” although really is not broad IaaS specifically. And there’s VMware cloud, which includes VMware Cloud Foundation, and even Dell’s cloud. We would expect HPE with its GreenLake strategy to pick up the momentum in future quarters. Captive clouds: And then there’s IBM and Oracle. They are in the game but they don’t have the CAPEX chops to compete with the hyper-scale leaders. IBM’s cloud revenue actually [dropped 7% last quarter](. So that highlights the challenge. Oracle’s cloud business is growing in the single digits and again underscores that these two companies are about migrating their software installed base to their respective captive clouds. As well, IBM, for example, has launched its financial cloud as a way to differentiate and not take AWS head-on in infrastructure. The bottom line is that other than the Big 3 and Alibaba, the rest of the pack will be plugging into, hybridizing, and cross-clouding those platforms. And there are definitely opportunities there, specifically related to creating an abstraction layer that hides the underlying cloud infrastructure — and, importantly, creates incremental value. [Comment]( [Share]( If you liked this post from [John @Furrier Newsletter](, why not share it? [Share]( © 2021 John Furrier [Unsubscribe]( 989 Commercial Street, Palo Alto, CA 94303 [Publish on Substack](

substack.com

John Furrier from John @Furrier Newsletter

Marketing emails from substack.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.