Supreme Court to Decide if Police Can Warrantlessly Raid Homes and Seize Guns of Innocent Citizens

SCOTUS will soon decide whether or not cops can raid the homes of innocent people without a warrant an                                                                                                                                                                                                        [Supreme Court to Decide if Police Can Warrantlessly Raid Homes and Seize Guns of Innocent Citizens]( SCOTUS will soon decide whether or not cops can raid the homes of innocent people without a warrant an [Matt Agorist]( Feb 8 [Comment]( [Share]( [gun]( Last week, the Free Thought Project [reported on HR 127,]( the most tyrannical gun bill ever proposed. The bill would target the poor by forcing citizens to pay $800 per year to possess firearms that they are required to register. It also bans multiple legal guns and ammo types, turning tens of millions of Americans into felons over night. While this bill is, without a doubt, the worst gun bill in history, it didn't lay out any guidelines for violating a citizen's Fourth Amendment right. Next month, however, the Supreme Court will be considering exactly that — can cops enter a home to seize guns without a warrant? That escalated quickly. In March, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Caniglia v. Strom, which asks the question of whether the “community caretaking” exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement extends to the home. The community caretaker exception, has already been recognized as an exception to the Fourth Amendment by the United States Supreme Court. In [Cady v. Dombrowski](, 413 U.S. 433 (1973), the United States Supreme Court held that police officers did not violate the Fourth Amendment when they searched the trunk of a car that had been towed after an accident. The Court acknowledged that, “except in certain carefully defined classes of cases,” police cannot search private property without consent or a warrant. It emphasized, however, that “there is a constitutional difference between houses and cars.” Since Cady, there has been a whole host of cases that took this holding and created the doctrine of “community caretaking.” Cady defined community caretaking activities as those “totally divorced from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of evidence relating to the violation of a criminal statute.” In other words, as long as an officer might reasonably think that a warrantless search will alleviate a danger to the community, the search is considered constitutional. This was in vehicles, not homes. [Read the full story on our site.]( [Comment]( [Share]( If you liked this post from [The Free Thought Project](, why not share it? [Share]( © 2021 Matt Agorist [Unsubscribe]( 548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104 [Publish on Substack](