Newsletter Subject

If Martin Luther King Jr. Were Alive Today, Big Tech Would've Already Banned Him

From

substack.com

Email Address

tftproject@substack.com

Sent On

Mon, Jan 18, 2021 03:43 PM

Email Preheader Text

If big tech censorship existed during the civil rights movement, would Martin Luther King Jr. have b

If big tech censorship existed during the civil rights movement, would Martin Luther King Jr. have been censored?                                                                                                                                                                                                        [If Martin Luther King Jr. Were Alive Today, Big Tech Would've Already Banned Him]( If big tech censorship existed during the civil rights movement, would Martin Luther King Jr. have been censored? [Matt Agorist]( Jan 18 Earlier this month, Donald Trump and 70,000 of his supporters were wiped off of Facebook and Twitter in a coordinated move by big tech censors. This move was largely praised by the left as the vitriol spewed by many of these folks, including the president, was inflammatory, offensive, and [some of it even violent.]( While calls for unprovoked violence should never be tolerated, the idea of silencing people for their peaceful political views — even if they are really stupid — is never a good idea. In fact, multiple anti-Trump folks were swept up in the censorship dragnet as well, including entirely peaceful folks. Showing the slippery slope of widespread blanket censorship policies is the fact that just days after Trump and his Q base were deplatformed, a man who has devoted his entire life to peace and liberty, [Dr. Ron Paul, was also censored.]( After news of his censorship began to make headlines, Facebook backtracked and claimed it was "a mistake." But was it really? In an email to the Free Thought Project, Dr. Paul said he wasn't "exactly buying their explanation," adding "It seems like Facebook is testing to see just how far they can go with banning anyone who doesn’t toe the establishment line." Indeed, this is a test that we've seen play out time and again — a test, in which TFTP has found itself too many times. If big tech can censor one of the most antiwar and peaceful political figures of our time, imagine what they would have done with this technology during the civil rights movement. As it is Martin Luther King Jr. Day, we find it a prudent choice to examine this very question. Please check out the entire story on our website at this link, If you liked this post from [The Free Thought Project](, why not share it? [Share]( © 2021 Matt Agorist [Unsubscribe]( 548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104 [Publish on Substack](

substack.com

Matt Agorist from The Free Thought Project

Marketing emails from substack.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.