Newsletter Subject

Funding vs Revenue in AI landscape: It's all topsy turvy

From

substack.com

Email Address

sinhaji@substack.com

Sent On

Thu, Jul 18, 2024 06:03 AM

Email Preheader Text

Will the trend reverse? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Will the trend reverse? ͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­ Forwarded this email? [Subscribe here]() for more [Funding vs Revenue in AI landscape: It's all topsy turvy]( Will the trend reverse? Jul 18   [READ IN APP](   [Upgrade to paid]( As of now, all the competition is in application layer - and it seems all the big money is going in foundational layer (pic courtesy [GTM Strategist](. Sounds crazy, right? After all, if you look at combined fund raised by OpenAI ($14Bn) Anthropic ($7.3Bn) and the revenue scale (OpenAI revenue is ~$3.4Bn / Anthropic is expected to hit ~$850mn by end of 2024 while Perplexity was at $20mn last year) - it is clear that right now, there is a LOTTT of money going in and out of the foundational layer. And application layer (in fact, mostly subscription businesses) is where all the startup action is - but with very little money and revenue. Ahh…the typical startup world, right? Sounds like a losing deal? I don’t think so. Ashish Sinha: On startups, AI and Platforms [AI's $600Bn hole..but look who is making money in the AI boom]( Gen AI is resulting in $600Bn capex hole globally. Here is a simple calculation by David Cahn of Sequoia Capital. All you have to do is to take Nvidia’s run-rate revenue forecast and multiply it by 2x to reflect the total cost of AI data centers (GPUs are half of the total cost of ownership—the other half includes energy, buildings, backup generators, etc… [Read more]( 21 days ago · 3 likes · Ashish/NextBigWhat 3 years from now. I’d like to believe that the trend will reverse as foundational / computing layers will get commoditized (it already is) and what’ll matter is the operational and application layer. With open source models catching up, expect commercial foundational models to start solving for vertical use-cases (OpenAI is already going deep in [healthcare with ThriveAI]( and will eventually launch more application layer businesses. [Share]( And at the application layer, one of the big drivers will be understanding customer’s JTBD (jobs to be done). The teams that have their ear to the ground and agile operations will continue to beat the ones stacked with funding and PR announcements. And yeah, the biggest challenge is that [CIOs are still not confused about putting AI to production.]( The AI winter will start soon. Who do you think will win in the long run? You're currently a free subscriber to [Ashish Sinha: On startups, AI and Platforms](. For the full experience, [upgrade your subscription.]( [Upgrade to paid](   [Like]( [Comment]( [Restack](   © 2024 Zakti Techmedia Private Limited 677, 27th main, HSR Layout, Bangalore-560102 [Unsubscribe]() [Get the app]( writing]()

Marketing emails from substack.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.