Newsletter Subject

Is Krutrim the new Koo?

From

substack.com

Email Address

nextbigwhatnews+india@substack.com

Sent On

Thu, Jul 4, 2024 02:43 AM

Email Preheader Text

Maybe not. An engineering driven ?maniacal? founder is the difference? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Maybe not. An engineering driven ‘maniacal’ founder is the difference? ͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­ Forwarded this email? [Subscribe here]() for more The V4 of NextBig-What delivers you big ideas on tech and culture from the world’s best books, podcasts and reports (and of course, great original commentaries). [Get 20% off for 1 year]( --------------------------------------------------------------- [Is Krutrim the new Koo?]( Maybe not. An engineering driven ‘maniacal’ founder is the difference? Jul 4   [READ IN APP](   Koo, India’s Twitter rival has shutdown.  Koo cracked 2 things which very few startups in the Bharat market have - A blue ocean of opportunities  No social network was going after non-English market), and - Early backers. It’s not easy raising even $10mn for a social network in a post-FB world (Koo ended up raising $70mn). (read: [Koo’s missed chaupal opportunity](. Why did Koo fail? Not just because of lack of funding, but wrong approach to solve the problem. Koo started with a great intent but ended up aligning with politician’s nationalistic approach. [Upgrade to paid]( It was essentially a bird with only the right wing Of course, the team tried to do course corrections, but I believe it was too late in the game to go back and fix the platform and the perception. --------------------------------------------------------------- What’s up with Ola’s Krutrim? Krutrim cracked 2 things which very starts in India’s deep tech ecosystem have: - A blue ocean of opportunities Building LLM for India is stil a huge opportunity - imagine licensing it to businesses for them to build custom solutions (quality data specific to India being the core here). - Early backers Who turns a unicorn without a product to showcase? Krutrim did. Like Koo, the nationalistic agenda runs deep in krutrim - which is a great go to market strategy.   Nationalistic agena: This is what Koo did and this is what Krutrim did to gain attention. And then, no further product improvement. For both companies. This is what happened with Koo and seems to be happening with Krutrim chatbot. This is the screenshot as of today (July 4th). Leaving aside the fact that Krutrim hasn’t released any tech papers or shared their training model details for India’s AI ecosystem to get excited and contribute to the platform. Again, great founder with great capability, but the intent (so far) is not to serve, but to make nationalistic claims. The only big difference and I believe it is the future of Krutrim is the cloud service. Krutrim cloud is a good start keeping in mind the cost of GPUs and I am hoping that Krutrim will move away from a consumer facing chatbot to platform business, as the consumer chatbot is just serving the founders nationalistic agenda - and nothing else. And yeah, kudos to Bhavish for walking the talk - by moving away from Azure to Krutrim cloud. I am guessing that an engineering driven ‘maniacal’ founder is the biggest leverage krutrim has. A guest post by [Ashish Sinha](ashishsinha237246?utm_campaign=guest_post_bio&utm_medium=email) Founder, NextBigWhat You’re currently a free subscriber. For the complete experience, upgrade your subscription. [Upgrade to paid]( India based subscribers can subscribe using the Razorpay link below (as Stripe doesn’t work with all Indian cards). [Subscribe with Razorpay]( Follow us on [Twitter]( | [LinkedIn]( | [YouTube](   [Like]( [Comment]( [Restack](   © 2024 Zakti Techmedia Private Limited 677, HSR Layout, Bangalore-560102 [Unsubscribe]() [Get the app]( writing]()

Marketing emails from substack.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.