Newsletter Subject

The Living Wage Scam

From

substack.com

Email Address

culturcidal@substack.com

Sent On

Fri, May 24, 2024 10:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Repeat after me. Economics is not magic. Economics is not magic. Economics is not magic. ? ? ?

Repeat after me. Economics is not magic. Economics is not magic. Economics is not magic. ͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­ Forwarded this email? [Subscribe here]() for more [The Living Wage Scam]( Repeat after me. Economics is not magic. Economics is not magic. Economics is not magic. [John Hawkins]( May 24   [READ IN APP](   How could it be possible for a person working at a business to NOT be paid a “living wage?” After all, they’re right there, ALIVE and working, right? They’re not some zombie, brought back to life by a voodoo practitioner or a bioweapon gone wrong, they’re a living, breathing human being making wages that they are using to keep themselves alive, correct? Furthermore, did they not willingly find the wage they’re being paid acceptable? Presumably so, correct? After all, slavery has been abolished in the West, so nobody puts a gun to your head and forces you to work yourself to death. Instead, it works just as the [late, great Milton Friedman noted]( [Milton Friedman quote: The most important single central fact about a free market...]( For example, long ago, your humble author worked as a Walmart portrait studio manager, a Burger King Assistant manager, and in a group home full of juvenile delinquents. None of those were great jobs, but I had a choice whether to accept the wages they were offering, and I said, “Yes.” Whether any of those jobs paid what would be considered a “living wage” today is hard to determine since it’s a fairly arbitrary term, but nevertheless, I lived through them, gained experience, improved my skills and here I am, still alive. All that being said, to be fair, we can’t just make fun of this obviously misnamed term, we need to discuss the arguments made by supporters of the living wage. In order to do that, let’s start with what a website called, “[The Living Wage Calculator]( has to say: While the minimum wage sets an earnings threshold under which our society is unwilling to let families slip, it fails to approximate the basic expenses of families in 2022. Consequently, many working adults must seek public assistance and/or hold multiple jobs to afford to feed, clothe, house, and provide medical care for themselves and their families. Establishing a living wage and an approximate income needed to meet a family’s basic needs would enable the working poor to achieve financial independence while maintaining housing and food security. When coupled with lowered expenses for childcare and housing, the living wage might also free up resources for savings, investment, and the purchase of capital assets (e.g., provisions for retirement or home purchases) that build wealth and ensure long-term financial stability and security. An analysis of the living wage (as calculated in December 2022 and reflecting a compensation being offered to an individual in 2023), compiling geographically specific expenditure data for food, childcare, healthcare, housing, transportation, and other necessities, finds that: The living wage in the United States is $25.02 per hour, or $104,077.70 per year in 2022, before taxes for a family of four (two working adults, two children), compared to $24.16, or $100,498.60 in 2021.   So, after reading this, there are a few things we can note. First of all, while there is no hard and fast rule for what constitutes a living wage, the amount is inevitably going to be considerably higher than the minimum wage. Furthermore, the idea of a living wage is clearly a political concept that doesn’t even make the faintest nod toward real-world economics. In other words, it’s essentially people who look at economics like magic going, “I think people should earn at least this much! Look into your crystal ball or wave your wand or whatever businesses do to earn money and make it happen!” This viewpoint becomes even clearer once you get out of the dry language of the website above and into the real world. For example, here are some comments on an X thread by Nina Turner, whose whole schtick is essentially just going, “Everything should be handed out for free” in a hundred different ways. Most comments disagreed with her, but here’s the sort of leftist thinking that causes them to embrace a living wage: So, the first huge mistake they’re making here is looking at a job primarily as a way to support people. In other words, why do jobs exist? Because people need money. So, the job is created to pay them, and it should pay them a certain amount of money that leftists find suitable because that’s why the job exists. Of course, this is Cargo Cult thinking. What’s a Cargo Cult? During WW2, the US was building airstrips on remote islands in the Pacific. The natives were shocked when we landed airplanes there but were also thrilled when we gave them food, supplies, and other goodies. Then, when WW2 ended, those bases were no longer needed, and the planes didn’t return. Quite understandably, the natives missed all that free cargo flowing in, and then myths started to spring up about it. The planes were sent by mythical figures, their ancestors, or their gods and could be enticed to come back with the proper rituals. Next thing you know, the natives are doing mock drills, building ceremonial airplanes and even fake control towers to entice those planes full of cargo to return. Ultimately, it didn’t work because they didn’t understand the purpose of those planes just as so many leftists that are ignorant of economics don’t understand the purpose of jobs. So, what is the purpose of a job? Again, [let’s go to Milton Friedman]( If you want $25 per hour to take orders at McDonald’s or push a button 4 times a day like George Jetson, the first problem you’re going to have is that you’re not producing more than $25 per hour worth of value to a company, so they have no reason to hire you: A company that pays workers $25 per hour to produce let’s say $5 per hour in value will quickly go out of business. For a company to hire someone, that person typically needs to be able to produce more value for the company than they are paying them. Furthermore, jobs that pay a “living wage” do not exist in a vacuum. On the contrary, many professions are actually competing in a global marketplace. If one company pays its workers $25 per hour and another puts out a similar product much cheaper by paying its workers less, the more expensive company is likely to fail. We also have automation replacing workers, AI on the horizon, and remote work is making a lot of positions much more competitive than they used to be: The focus always, always, always needs to be on workers building skills that make them WORTH MORE, not pressuring businesses to pay workers MORE THAN THEY’RE WORTH. The free market is not some kind of Las Vegas magic act. It doesn’t pay people certain amounts of money because the audience thinks it will look cool. Ultimately, the salaries workers are paid have to be justified by the amount of value they produce for businesses to survive. That’s what the real world is like, not the magical world of the living wage where people can be paid any amount of money if enough communists and unemployed poets want it to be that way.    --------------------------------------------------------------- [Upgrade to paid]( [Share]( [Leave a comment]( [101 Things All Young Adults Should Know]( Invite your friends and earn rewards If you enjoy Culturcidal by John Hawkins, share it with your friends and earn rewards when they subscribe. [Invite Friends](   [Like]( [Comment]( [Restack](   © 2024 John Hawkins 548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104 [Unsubscribe]() [Get the app]( writing]()

Marketing emails from substack.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.