Newsletter Subject

AI in Enterprise: The fight between open source vs. closed models [Report]

From

substack.com

Email Address

atomicideas+chief-ai-officer-newsletter@substack.com

Sent On

Mon, May 6, 2024 09:33 AM

Email Preheader Text

Btw, guess which is the most used GPT model? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Btw, guess which is the most used GPT model? ͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­ Forwarded this email? [Subscribe here]() for more Hola! We launched India++, a new newsletter covering important topics/trends around India, the country everyone is looking forward to! --------------------------------------------------------------- [AI in Enterprise: The fight between open source vs. closed models [Report]]( Btw, guess which is the most used GPT model? May 6   [READ IN APP](   How are enterprises using GenAI or even trying to use Gen AI? What are the top use cases of Gen AI in Enterprises? And how do they even measure the success of implementing Gen AI? 5 big ideas from a report by Scale AI team. [Upgrade to paid]( Open source models usage is increasing; Closed-source is still winning though Model preferences continue to evolve and remain a key decision for an organization’s AI strategy. The largest increase in usage came from closed-source models with 86% of organizations using these models compared to 37% the year prior. This is likely due to a combination of factors. Many organizations have existing contracts with cloud service providers who in turn have partnerships with closed source model developers, making usage of closed-source models easier. Many closed-source models also outperform open source models out-of-the-box. Despite that, open-source model usage still increased from 41% to 66%. This is likely due to the flexibility opensource models provide for fine-tuning and hosting. [Share]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Operational efficiency is the primary driver 61% of organizations stated improved operational efficiency as the leading driver behind adopting generative AI. Improved customer experience came in second at 55%. Despite growing adoption, there are still a number of challenges that stall widespread use of generative AI. 61% of respondents cited infrastructure, tooling, or out-of-the-box solutions not meeting their specific needs. Processes like RAG and fine-tuning introduce the complexity of integrating external data sources in realtime, ensuring the relevance and accuracy of retrieved information, managing additional computational costs, and addressing potential biases or errors. --------------------------------------------------------------- And the fav model is..? GPT-4 wins, which as per Sam Altman is the [dumbest GPT model we will ever use!]( --------------------------------------------------------------- Deploying and Customizing AI Use Case Coding copilots are becoming mainstream with technical users being early adopters of solutions like GitHub Copilot, CodeLlama, and Devin. [Share NextBigWhat: startups trends, tech and big ideas!]() Model vendors have responded to demand for content generation with prompt templates that guide users to effective content creation questions for functions including Marketing, Product Management, and Public Relations. India based subscribers can subscribe using the Razorpay link below (as Stripe doesn’t work with all Indian cards). [Subscribe with Razorpay]( You’re currently a free subscriber to Big Ideas by NextBigWhat.com . For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. [Upgrade to paid](   [Like]( [Comment]( [Restack](   © 2024 Zakti Techmedia Private Limited 677, HSR Layout, Bangalore-560102 [Unsubscribe]() [Get the app]( writing]()

Marketing emails from substack.com

View More
Sent On

01/06/2024

Sent On

01/06/2024

Sent On

01/06/2024

Sent On

01/06/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.