Newsletter Subject

Here's What It Takes To Score Big Gains Consistently In The Market

From

streetauthority.com

Email Address

editors@streetauthority.com

Sent On

Fri, Jan 28, 2022 12:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

Here's What It Takes To Score Big Gains Consistently In The Market | I wish I could say it was the e

Here's What It Takes To Score Big Gains Consistently In The Market [View Online](=)|[Unsubscribe]( [Street Authority Daily] January 28, 2022 Here's What It Takes To Score Big Gains Consistently In The Market By Jimmy Butts [Jimmy Butts] I wish I could say it was the easiest big winner I've ever had in the stock market… but it wasn't. It never is. Most amateur stock investors come to the market thinking that they'll strike it rich overnight. They'll scoop up 10,000 shares of some penny-stock that's unquestionably going to become the next Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN) or Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) and make them wealthy beyond their wildest imagination. 99.9% of the time that doesn't happen. What does happen is they usually lose all their money. They resort to indexed funds or target-date retirement funds. Not because it's not possible to make great money in the stock market, but because most aren't willing to roll up their sleeves and do the work. Now, I've made quite a few big gains in the market over the course of my investing career. (Plus a few losers that I'd like to forget.) A few of those winners were just plain luck -- but less than you'd think. Looking back, there's one big winner -- an 80%-plus gain to be more precise -- that I think illustrates exactly what it takes to consistently rack up gains like this. It came from a combination of hours spent reading through financial statements, SEC filings, listening to conference calls, and of course some good timing (or luck). But the most striking detail of all that led me to pull the trigger came from a tiny detail buried in the company's "Other" segment. A footnote if you will… Big Gains Are Found In The Footnotes It was 2014, and I had just put the finishing touches on a special report where I recommended a large pharmaceutical company called Hospira. The company produced a number of the drugs that were found on the FDA's official "[Drug Shortages](" list. This is a list of medically necessary products with the greatest impact on public health. Buying a company that produced many of the drugs on this list seemed like a good idea. After all, the demand was there, and this company was the supply. Turned out that I wasn't the only one that realized Hospira was a wonderful business. Less than six months after recommending Hospira, the drug giant Pfizer (NYSE: PFE) stepped in and purchased the company for about $17 billion. We made a quick 58% gain on the trade. But one of the drugs that were a small part of Hospira's portfolio caught my attention. It was a drug called Naloxone. Naloxone is an "antagonist" that reverses the effects of an opioid overdose. At this time, the opioid epidemic was barely making headlines. But it was quickly becoming a disturbing trend that cities and states were trying to combat. I dug a little deeper to find who were the major players in the naloxone space. After all, it made up a small part of Hospira's operations. I was interested in a more direct play… That's when I came across a small company called Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: AMPH), which was one of the few companies that had a focus on naloxone. More specifically, it had an easily injectable naloxone that it could get into the hands of first responders to help save the life of someone overdosing from opioid abuse. I couldn't believe it. Most investors were completely overlooking Amphastar's business. This company should have easily fetched more than what it was trading for at the time. After all, putting two and two together - seeing a spike in opioid overdoses and the one drug that reverses the effects - meant that this drug was going to be in great demand. And this company produced it. I read through press releases, SEC filings, spent hours and hours listening to conference calls, and any investor presentations that the company released to see if I was missing something. But as they say, the devil's in the details… You see, at the time it wasn't obvious that Amphastar was a producer of naloxone. In fact, the company had naloxone grouped in with its "Other Marketed Products" segment. If you looked through the firm's 2014 10-K you will find that the word "naloxone" appears less than five times. Fast forward to 2018 and look at the firm's 10-K, you'll find that naloxone got its own segment line and appears nearly 30 times throughout the filing. Most investors missed the opportunity with Amphastar. That's because they didn't roll up their sleeves and do the work. I did. I bought shares of Amphastar in August 2014 for less than $10 a share. Less than a year later, I parted ways with them for around $18 a share. [Image: Why This Matters... I don't tell you this story to brag. I tell you this story because it's vital to read the small details - the footnotes that others won't. That's where you'll find the company "secrets" that others will easily miss. Secrets that could lead to a sizable windfall. Spotting these before others catch on doesn't happen every day. But when you do find that one anomaly that other investors have missed, you'll want to pounce on it (assuming you've already done your due diligence). I realize not everyone has the time (or patience) to comb through filings like I do. That's okay, because it's my job. And similar to Amphastar, I've just spotted another little detail, missed by most, that could bring a windfall of revenue for this little-known company. It's not in the drug space, but it's capitalizing on another massive trend: global internet access… I've been telling my readers about a little-known satellite company that just made a game-changing acquisition. And buried in the details of the deal was a stunning revelation that could be worth billions... [To get a full briefing and learn how you can profit, check out my report here.]( To ensure that you receive these emails, [please add us to your address book.]( Disclosure: StreetAuthority doesn't own shares of any securities mentioned in this article. Members of our staff are restricted from buying or selling any securities for three days after being featured in our advisories or on our website. StreetAuthority is a publisher of financial news and opinions. StreetAuthority is not a securities broker/dealer or an investment advisor and we do not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers or investment advisors. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases and publicly available information which may contain errors. All information contained in our newsletters and/or on our website(s) should be independently verified with the companies or sources mentioned. You are responsible for your own investment decisions and should always conduct your own research and due diligence and consider obtaining professional advice before making any investment decision. This message was sent by an automated message delivery platform. Please do not reply to this email address. Any messages sent to this address will be automatically deleted. We sincerely hope that you benefit from your subscription to this complimentary newsletter, and we're willing to do whatever it takes to keep you as a satisfied subscriber. You may contact our customer service department by [visiting this link](. To update your subscription or unsubscribe, please [click here](. Copyright (c) 2022 StreetAuthority, 7600A Leesburg Pike, Suite 300 Falls Church, VA 22043. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited. [Terms]( | [Privacy]( | [Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from streetauthority.com

View More
Sent On

03/10/2024

Sent On

03/10/2024

Sent On

02/10/2024

Sent On

02/10/2024

Sent On

01/10/2024

Sent On

01/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.