Newsletter Subject

MSNBC Host Makes Excuses After Kamala's Train Wreck

From

steadfastupdates.com

Email Address

mail@steadfastupdates.com

Sent On

Fri, Sep 27, 2024 11:21 AM

Email Preheader Text

Dems are going to want Biden back soon. It was quite a spectacle when MSNBC anchor sat down with Vic

[Logo]( [MSNBC Host Makes Excuses After Kamala's Train Wreck] [MSNBC Host Makes Excuses After Kamala's Train Wreck]( Dems are going to want Biden back soon. It was quite a spectacle when MSNBC anchor [Stephanie Ruhle]( sat down with Vice President Kamala Harris for a friendly chat. Well, "friendly" might be putting it mildly. From the moment the cameras started rolling, Ruhle seemed prepared to go full defense mode, ready to jump in and excuse any of Harris' typical rambling responses. In fact, she didn't wait long to start the spin, telling fellow MSNBC host Chris Hayes, "One could watch and say she didn't give a clear and direct answer. And that's okay because we're not talking about clear and direct issues." Oh really? Since when are "clear and direct answers" no longer required when discussing policy? First, Ruhle said this... Stephanie Ruhle on her interview with Kamala : "She doesn't answer the question around if the GOP is controlling the Senate, if she can't raise corporate taxes, where is she going to get the money from to expand the child tax credit and do all the things she wants to do? And she... [pic.twitter.com/ztkhEn5V13]( - Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) [September 25, 2024]( But Ruhle must have got a good talking to because it seems she later changed her tune to say it doesn't matter if Kamala doesn't give clear and direct answers. Sure, it's ok, she's only running to be our nation's leader! Insert eye roll. Ruhle: "One could watch and say she didn't give a clear and direct answer. And that's okay, because we're not talking about clear and direct issues." Embarrassing. [pic.twitter.com/gxsNDzRXAV]( - Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) [September 25, 2024]( But this shouldn't come as a shock to anyone who's been paying attention to Harris' political rise. She became the Democratic Party's candidate for president this year not because she wowed the country with her brilliant leadership or persuasive platform. No, she's there because Joe Biden, at 81 years old, was quietly nudged out by powerful party insiders and big donors. And Harris, who didn't win a single primary vote on her own merits, was basically the last one standing. Now that she's the candidate, you'd think she'd be making more of an effort to explain what she actually stands for. Instead, it's been a non-stop stream of talking points and vague promises with little to no substance. Her interview with Ruhle was no different. The cherry on top was when Ruhle tried to preemptively dismiss criticism, knowing full well that Harris' answers weren't going to win anyone over. And guess what? She was right. When Harris was asked how she planned to fight "price gouging," something she's made a big deal about lately despite no real evidence, she predictably dodged the question. Instead of explaining how she'd tackle the problem, she rambled on about disasters like the pandemic and climate-related events. What does that have to do with price gouging? Who knows. But she sure made it sound like she had a plan. Spoiler: she didn't. Harris couldn't resist throwing in the classic line: "I'm never going to apologize for going after companies and corporations that take advantage of the desperation of the American people." So, let's get this straight: there is no real explanation for her economic policy, and instead, she just throws out another boilerplate talking point about evil corporations. It's the same tired rhetoric we've been hearing for years. Kamala fails to explain how she plans on tackling "price gouging" without implementing price controls. That's exactly what her plan is - Venezuelan style price controls. [pic.twitter.com/zcboNd9mTU]( - Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) [September 25, 2024]( Even Ruhle had to do some serious verbal gymnastics to keep Harris afloat. The fact that Harris' first solo network appearance as the Democratic candidate didn't include a more serious interrogation should raise some eyebrows. She previously did an interview with CNN's Dana Bash, but even then, she had Minnesota Governor Tim Walz by her side for moral support. And if anyone thinks she'll be different from her last three years as Vice President, here is Biden himself letting you know otherwise. BIDEN: "As Vice President, there wasn't a single thing that I did that she couldn't do and so I was able to delegate her responsibility on everything from foreign policy to domestic policy." [pic.twitter.com/Uat7jXWNrO]( - Breaking911 (@Breaking911) [September 25, 2024]( Ruhle's sit-down with Harris felt more like a PR stunt than an actual interview. And when she defended Harris on Bill Maher's show, saying that it doesn't matter if she answers real policy questions because, well, she's not Trump-this just about sums up the entire situation. Forget the answers; just remember she's not the other guy. Some reaction from me on [@cnn]( tonight to Kamala Harris's MSNBC interview, and what she and Biden said today about their failed policies and pathetic class warfare. [pic.twitter.com/EA65h1QIL2]( - Scott Jennings (@ScottJenningsKY) [September 26, 2024]( If this is what we can expect from Harris moving forward, then brace yourselves for more incoherent non-answers and even more media shielding. At some point, though, Harris will have to answer for something-whether the mainstream media is ready for it or not. [Congressional Staffers Compromised, Why Is Humiliating] [Congressional Staffers Compromised, Why Is Humiliating]( How dumb are these people to do this? [Dem Senator Dumps Kamala After Her Dangerous Announcement] [Dem Senator Dumps Kamala After Her Dangerous Announcement]( This would turn everything on its head. [Janet Jackson's Kamala Comment Has The Media Fuming] [Janet Jackson's Kamala Comment Has The Media Fuming]( The left has no idea what to do about this. [Trump Receives Endorsement That Gives Kamala Nightmares] [Trump Receives Endorsement That Gives Kamala Nightmares]( Didn't see this coming. [Emhoff Has Eyes Rolling Over Why Kamala Can't Be Criticized] [Emhoff Has Eyes Rolling Over Why Kamala Can't Be Criticized]( This is coming from a guy who had an affair with the babysitter. You are receiving this email because you opted in to Steadfast Updates daily newsletter. We take your privacy very seriously and will keep your information in the strictest confidence. We will email you from time to time with relevant news and updates, but you can stop receiving information from us at any time by following very simple instructions that will be included at the bottom of any correspondence you should receive from us. Copyright 2024. Steadfast Updates. All rights reserved. 2423 S Orange Ave, Suite 340 Orlando, FL 32806 [UNSUBSCRIBE]( | [VIEW IN BROWSER]( | [PRIVACY POLICY](

Marketing emails from steadfastupdates.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.