Newsletter Subject

How To Chainwhirl Your Way To The Top

From

starcitygames.com

Email Address

donotreply@starcitygames.com

Sent On

Thu, May 17, 2018 10:09 PM

Email Preheader Text

has finally made its arrival. It might be a bit early to call this Standard format one of the best o

[ ]Severa Chats Chainwhirler, Black Creates Creatureless Control, and Handy Harnesses Humans Newsletter Thursday, May 17th [Goblin Chainwhirler]( has finally made its arrival. It might be a bit early to call this Standard format one of the best of all time, but I'm already starting to lean that way. Consider that over the past three weeks we've had dominant performances from three very different decks and it's hard not to be excited about the next few weeks of Magic. First, it was U/W Control with [Teferi, Hero of Dominaria]( [Lyra Dawnbringer]( and [Torrential Gearhulk](. Then, it was W/B Aggro with [Toolcraft Exemplar]( [History of Benalia]( and [Knight of Malice](. But last weekend was maybe the most important, as [Goblin Chainwhirler]( [Unlicensed Disintegration]( and [Chandra, Torch of Defiance]( showed that red is just as good as it ever has been. I'm not the only one pumped about this Standard format though. Four-time Grand Prix champion, Matt Severa, is one of many trying to figure out if R/B Aggro will continue its dominance this weekend at GP Toronto. Three-time Pro Tour Top 8 competitor, Sam Black, is up to his usual madness by pushing the limits on creatureless control. As for Emma Handy? Her focus may be on Modern, but when a deck as dominant as Humans is floating around, it would be unwise to ignore it. Speaking of Modern, I'll be watching a lot of it this weekend as the SCG Tour rolls into Derby City for the [Louisville Open](. I'll be joined by Patrick Sullivan, Nick Miller, and the rest of the [@SCGTour](scgtour) crew as we work our way through 15 rounds of Modern action to find out if Humans can keep its stranglehold on Magic's most popular format. Be sure to join us for all the fun starting at 10:30am ET at [twitch.tv/scgtour](! — [Cedric Phillips](CedricAPhillips), Content Coordinator [Louisville Open May 19-20]( [May 26-27]( [May 26-27 Modern]( [June 2]( [June 2 Modern]( [June 8-10]( [June 8-10 Season One]( [Matt Severa]( [Will R/B Aggro Continue To Win?]( By [Matt Severa](   [Twitter]( How did we get to this spot? Most of the deck has been Standard legal for over a year now, so why the sudden resurgence? Is [Goblin Chainwhirler]( just that good? Well yes, it is, but there's more to it than that. At the end of the last Standard season, before Dominaria was released, R/B was already poised to become the deck to beat in Standard. To understand what's going on here, we need to turn back the clock a few months... Last season's Standard was all about [The Scarab God](. Many excellent articles have already been written analyzing The Scarab God's ability to dominate the late game, so I won't rehash that here. Instead, I want to discuss those times when it's used to stabilize the game. These are the games where, against an aggro deck, you just decide to ignore their threats for a turn and cast it. If you untapped with The Scarab God, you were probably going to win. This play tended to work out pretty well when Mono-Red Aggro was the premier aggro deck in the format. Your Mono-Red opponent was often forced to produce an [Ahn-Crop Crasher]( immediately and hope that you didn't have a way to kill it before combat. That, or throw two removal spells at The Scarab God and hope they still had enough gas left over to kill you. The efficacy of that line was reduced considerably when R/B Aggro replaced Mono-Red as the aggro deck to beat. [Continue Reading]( [Find Game Night Events Near You!]( [Sam Black]( [Pushing Creatureless Control]( By [Sam Black](   [Twitter]( Watching coverage of GP Birmingham, I was really impressed by Leo Lahonen's U/W Control deck. I love the move away from creatures, as blanking the opponent's removal is great in this format. I'd been playing decks that focused on doing this, but I went further, and tried to blank [Vraska's Contempt]( by not playing planeswalkers either. After trying a few configurations, I settled on [The Mirari Conjecture]( loops with Blink of an Eye that eventually killed by copying and/or rebuying [Fight with Fire](. I like the value [The Mirari Conjecture]( generated, and I liked that the [Fight with Fire]( kill just required playing one or two copies of a mediocre removal spell to give my deck a win condition. What I didn't like was how much harder I had to work to get my card advantage than I would if I were just playing [Teferi](. When your deck is all reactive spells and you're looping The Mirari Conjecture, chapter three doesn't actually do anything for you most of the time, and when you're returning [Blink of an Eye]( with chapter one, you're basically just spending nine mana to draw a card and add [Commit]( to your hand every few turns. That's not bad, but if your opponent isn't doing anything, it doesn't really get you anywhere; you just end up with a full hand and discarding a lot. [Continue Reading]( [Find Invitational Qualifier Events This Week!]( [Emma Handy]( [Play Humans Or Be Wrong]( By [Emma Handy](   [Facebook](   [Twitter]( Humans is the best deck in Modern. Period. We can spend time arguing the deck's matchups, results, or positioning, but looking at the past six months or so, Humans' presence is undeniable. The fact that it's still succeeding illustrates that there's some combination of the deck truly being great and people refusing to properly respect the archetype. Regardless of these two points' distribution, Humans is what you should be playing in Modern if your goal is to consistently do well. I don't use these words lightly and wouldn't put my name to them if I didn't think it true. The last time I said something to this effect it eventually ended up getting me a job. Like the old Rally the Ancestors decks of Standard's past, Humans tends to abuse an axis that the format isn't quite prepared to handle. The way that Humans does it is a bit subtler and takes some explaining. [Continue Reading]( [Possibility Storm!]( [Possibility Storm: Gears Of War!]( [See the solution!]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( StarCityGames.com, 5728 Williamson Road N.W, Roanoke, VA 24012 [SafeUnsubscribe™ {EMAIL}]( [Forward email]( | [Update Profile]( | [About our service provider]( Sent by donotreply@starcitygames.com in collaboration with [Constant Contact]( [Try it free today](

Marketing emails from starcitygames.com

View More
Sent On

05/04/2020

Sent On

24/05/2018

Sent On

22/05/2018

Sent On

21/05/2018

Sent On

14/05/2018

Sent On

11/05/2018

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.