Newsletter Subject

Steer Clear of the 'Worst in Show'

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Sat, Mar 9, 2024 12:33 PM

Email Preheader Text

Even during bull markets, there's always a loser out there somewhere. And today, we've identified th

Even during bull markets, there's always a loser out there somewhere. And today, we've identified the "worst in show" sector... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [DailyWealth] The Weekend Edition is pulled from the daily Stansberry Digest. --------------------------------------------------------------- Steer Clear of the 'Worst in Show' By Corey McLaughlin --------------------------------------------------------------- It has been "buy, buy, buy," you might say, for the "best in show" and the market in general... Earlier this week, my colleague Dan Ferris sent me a link to a Bloomberg interview. In it, the economist known as "Dr. Doom" – Nouriel Roubini, a past speaker at our annual Stansberry Research conference – explained why even he is bullish on the economy now... I'm less worried than in the past... There is a serious possibility of what people refer to as a "no landing" – that growth remains above potential and inflation remains sticky... because of technology and other factors and the Fed doesn't cut three times, only two, one maybe, some people say zero. "Last Bear Gored," Dan wrote to me. But I take Roubini's main point... His takeaway was that the unrealized "risk" to the market right now isn't a recession like many folks have been talking about. Instead, the risk is continued growth. Without an economic slowdown, the Federal Reserve won't cut rates as much as folks have expected. (We might even see another rate increase first.) And remember, the idea of rate cuts is the catalyst for the present four-month rally in the major U.S. indexes. Either of these outcomes would lead to adjustments in market expectations... and volatility for stocks and bonds. If that's the case, the market may get bumpy in the short term... But in the end, economic growth isn't a terrible thing. Nor is a continued "Fed pause." It means the economy is at just the right temperature today... not so hot that the Fed will want to raise rates, nor cooling off so much that millions of Americans will lose their jobs. However, that doesn't mean we'll remain at this "Goldilocks" point indefinitely. In the macroeconomic world, investors received the latest labor market data yesterday... The unemployment rate rose to 3.9% in February. That was up from 3.7% in January... and its highest mark since January 2022, when the rate was in the process of trending lower from a pandemic peak. The unemployment rate has incrementally moved higher in the past year. And on Wednesday and Thursday, Fed Chair Jerome Powell testified in Congress for a good five hours. He said essentially the same things we've been hearing for months – that the federal-funds rate is likely at its peak. But Powell was also his most direct about the possible path of rates ahead, telling a Senate committee on Thursday that the Fed "can and will begin" to lower rates this year. A majority of fed-funds futures traders are betting that the first rate cut will happen at the Fed's June meeting. None of this news was all that shocking. We'll continue to monitor the Fed's movements. In the meantime, we shouldn't keep our heads in the sand about other risks in the market, either... Today, I want to take a look at a sector that deserves the title of "worst in show" – and share what the story might mean about the economy and markets in general... --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Link: # [Airing Now: A Stunning 90% Win Rate]( Our friend and Wall Street legend Marc Chaikin's Power Gauge issued buy signals on 90% of the top 50 stocks of 2023 and at least nine out of 10 top stocks of every single year going back to 2016. Now, he's revealing a little-known market event he has never shared before – one he can predict with 90% accuracy. Find out more when you join him at his latest market broadcast (and get his two recommendations for free). [Get the details here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- Without further ado, the "worst in show" is... New York Community Bancorp (NYCB)... and loans gone bad, generally speaking. While the idea of a "soft landing" for the U.S. economy (or "no landing," as Roubini suggested) is getting more popular these days, NYCB's flight in this higher-interest-rate era is crashing hard... And it's indicative of more potential problems for certain banks. You've probably seen recent headlines about NYCB. This regional bank has been struggling for a while now. Its shares are down about 65% from where they were in late January. That's when it disclosed a $260 million quarterly net loss... and said it was cutting its dividend by 70% to build up more than $500 million needed for potential loan losses tied to declining real estate values in New York. Though the stock has recouped some slight losses – and got a billion-dollar-plus capital injection this week, partly from an investment group led by former Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin – NYCB shares remain at their lowest level (adjusted for splits) since the great financial crisis. There are two reasons behind the recent pain... First, credit-ratings agency Moody's downgraded NYCB's ratings for the second time in a month. That put NYCB's deposit rating three levels below investment grade... and pushed the stock price down. Second, news broke that two executives at NYCB left the bank after the discovery of "material weaknesses in internal controls" about the vetting of loans to commercial real estate clients. NYCB was focused on multifamily and office properties. These areas of commercial real estate have declined in value as more companies have shifted to remote-work setups, or at the least downsized the number of workers required to be in an office regularly. Moody's said that NYCB may need to increase its estimates for losses over the next two years, above what it already has. That's due to both the risk tied to office loans and a drop in the value of multifamily loans. As Mike DiBiase wrote in February's issue of his Stansberry's Credit Opportunities newsletter – before the downgrades – the losses for NYCB were already staggering when it reported its earnings earlier this year. As Mike wrote... The regional bank – which bought parts of bankrupt Signature Bank last year – shocked investors when it reported 2023 earnings. It recorded a massive increase in its reserve for loan losses that was 10 times higher than analysts expected. The bank said it was building its reserves to "address office sector weakness." The $552 million charge wiped out all of the bank's profits. This is only the beginning. The charge was just a tiny portion of NYCB's commercial real estate portfolio, which totals more than $13 billion. The continued sell-off is emblematic of growing fears and realities for regional banks that may be exposed to defaults. Nearly $1 trillion in loans will come due this year, including roughly $500 billion in commercial real estate loans. The tale of NYCB is essentially a shade of the regional-banking crisis that unfolded one year ago this month. And we could see more trouble for bank stocks from here. And speaking of banks... If we experience higher interest rates for longer... that creates challenges throughout the economy that many folks might not be prepared for. Higher rates put more pressure on businesses that need to refinance loans. They lead to more debt costs for the U.S. government. And they make things worse for banks already sitting on losses. Mike told his Credit Opportunities subscribers to expect more regional-bank failures this year. And that means even tighter credit for individuals and businesses. We've already been concerned about debt costs coming due this year, even with rate cuts possibly ahead. Without them, the risk grows for banks – and for other entities that might not be top of mind, like city governments. Here in Baltimore, for example, the city is losing tens of millions of dollars' worth of its tax base tied to commercial real estate – from just one building... When the investment firm T. Rowe Price decided to move its headquarters to a new location in downtown Baltimore, the building that used to be its home saw its assessed value drop by nearly $80 million. As the Baltimore Banner reported recently... The city has seen its property tax base shrink by $181 million just since July 1, largely a consequence of updated appraisals to major commercial properties that have lost business and tenants since the pandemic. Commercial real estate activity screeched to a halt post-pandemic. As it picks up again, this kind of thing could become commonplace. So, as important and fun as it might be to enjoy the bull market trends everyone is talking about right now... make sure you do what you can to avoid the "worst in show." There's always a bull market somewhere – but there are always big losers, too. Switching gears, primary voters in 15 states and one territory (American Samoa) headed to the polls on Super Tuesday... This day marks one of the bigger dates in a presidential-election year. From here on out, we usually have a good picture of what the race to the White House will look like, with the leading candidates of the two major parties clear. We hesitate to trust much of anything when it comes to politics anymore. But we also like to look at history, for what it's worth. As I wrote in the Digest back in January... As much as it may feel and appear that "this time will be different" in politics – and maybe it will be if all hell breaks loose come November – we like to see what history suggests about future market behavior. So we watched with interest as Marc Chaikin, our friend and founder of our corporate affiliate Chaikin Analytics, went on camera to discuss the election cycle a little more than a week ago in advance of Super Tuesday (and this week's State of the Union address). Marc explained precisely what he's expecting from the markets in 2024 – and why it matters that this is an election year. The political outcome isn't the difference-maker, Marc said, but something else... Marc has traded through 13 presidential-election years over five decades as a professional investor. And every four years, he has seen patterns repeat themselves over and over. As he noted, in every election year going back nearly 100 years, we tend to see a shift occur in the markets right about now... When you look at the market this way, nothing is a coincidence. It's a pattern. Marc revealed all the details in his presentation, which will only be available for a few more days. We urge you to take some time to watch the free replay while it's still available. Without giving too much away, I can tell you that Marc says Super Tuesday tends to be a spark for how the market will perform in a presidential-election year – and he shared plenty of evidence in his presentation. Not only that... but Marc also offered up precisely how he plans to trade the rest of this year, shared details on his powerful Power Gauge tool, and gave away a pair of free recommendations – one buy and one sell. You can still get those if you tune in now. As he says... There's really no such thing as a "losing" year if you, one, understand what's coming to the U.S. stock market, per the election indicator... and, two, know exactly which stocks to buy and avoid. [Click here to watch now and learn more](. Good investing, Corey McLaughlin --------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: Marc predicted 2023's historic banking crisis five months ahead of time. In fact, his Power Gauge system issued a warning for Silicon Valley Bank back in July 2022. Now, a massive real estate "debt bomb" is looming over regional banks. That's why Marc is stepping forward with a critical update to share how you can protect yourself in 2024... and even profit. [Click here to learn the details](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Tell us what you think of this content]( [We value our subscribers' feedback. To help us improve your experience, we'd like to ask you a couple brief questions.]( [Click here to rate this e-mail]( You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to DailyWealth. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from DailyWealth [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You're receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (273)

year wrote writers worth worst work without whole week wednesday watched watch warning want volatility vetting value usually used urge tune trouble traded trade totals top today title time thursday think things thing tend tell technology talking tale takeaway take suggestions subscription subscribers struggling stocks stock state stansberry speaking speak spark somewhere show shocking shifted shares share shade sent seen see security sector says sand said risks risk right revealing rest responsibility reserves reserve reported remember remain redistribution recouped recorded recommendation recommend receiving received really realities read ratings rate race questions pushed pulled published protect profits process pressure presentation prepared predict precisely powell potential popular polls politics plans picks perform peak past part pair one nycb number noted news need multifamily much movements move months month monitor money millions might meantime means mean maybe may matters markets market marc make majority losses loser lose looming look longer loans little link likely like learned learn lead landing kind keep join january issue interest instead information individuals indicative increase important identified idea hot history hesitate hearing heads headquarters happen government got getting get fun friend founder folks focused flight feedback fed february factors fact exposed experience expecting expected expect example evidence even estimates essentially entities enjoy endorse employees emblematic economy due drop downgrades dividend discuss discovery disclosed direct different details deserves declined days dailywealth cutting cooling continue content consequence congress concerned companies coming comes coincidence city charge catalyst case camera buy businesses bullish building build bonds betting best beginning begin based banks bank baltimore avoid available ask areas appear anything americans always also already advance ado adjustments address acting account 90 70 65 2024 2023 2016

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

13/05/2024

Sent On

12/05/2024

Sent On

12/05/2024

Sent On

11/05/2024

Sent On

11/05/2024

Sent On

11/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.